Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter from feedlot cattle

Aims: This study examined 448 Campylobacter strains isolated in 1999 and 2000 from US feedlot cattle for resistance to 12 antimicrobials. Methods and Results: Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility using the E-test method. Approximately 60% (n = 267) were resistant to one or more antimicrobials, and 19·6% (n = 88) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Of the Campylobacter jejuni isolates, 49·1% (n = 187) were resistant to tetracycline, 10·2% (n = 39) were resistant to nalidixic acid, 8·4% were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 1·8% (n = 7) were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to any of the other eight antimicrobials was 1·3% or less, but 14·4% (n = 55) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. In the Campylobacter coli group, 65·7% (n = 44) were resistant to tetracycline, 52·2% (n = 35) were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 22·4% (n = 15) were resistant to nalidixic acid, and 9·0% (n = 6) were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to any of the remaining eight antimicrobials was 3·0% or less, although 49·3% (n = 33) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Conclusions: Although antimicrobials are widely used in US feedlot cattle production, our results demonstrate generally low levels of resistance to a broad range of commonly used antimicrobials relative to other recent studies. Significance and Impact of the Study: Resistance data on Campylobacter isolated from this major US livestock commodity is lacking. This overview enhances current knowledge and provides a basis for further studies

Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Campylobacter from feedlot cattle

Aims: This study examined 448 Campylobacter strains isolated in 1999 and 2000 from US feedlot cattle for resistance to 12 antimicrobials. Methods and Results: Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility using the E-test method. Approximately 60% (n = 267) were resistant to one or more antimicrobials, and 19·6% (n = 88) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Of the Campylobacter jejuni isolates, 49·1% (n = 187) were resistant to tetracycline, 10·2% (n = 39) were resistant to nalidixic acid, 8·4% were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 1·8% (n = 7) were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to any of the other eight antimicrobials was 1·3% or less, but 14·4% (n = 55) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. In the Campylobacter coli group, 65·7% (n = 44) were resistant to tetracycline, 52·2% (n = 35) were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 22·4% (n = 15) were resistant to nalidixic acid, and 9·0% (n = 6) were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Resistance to any of the remaining eight antimicrobials was 3·0% or less, although 49·3% (n = 33) were resistant to two or more antimicrobials. Conclusions: Although antimicrobials are widely used in US feedlot cattle production, our results demonstrate generally low levels of resistance to a broad range of commonly used antimicrobials relative to other recent studies. Significance and Impact of the Study: Resistance data on Campylobacter isolated from this major US livestock commodity is lacking. This overview enhances current knowledge and provides a basis for further studies

USDA Multi-Agency Project: Collaboration in Animal Health, Food Safety & Epidemiology (CAHFSE)

Despite producer interventions, on-going research and continued surveillance, food borne outbreaks continue and multiple antimicrobial resistant bacteria have emerged. A multi-agency APublic Health Action Plan to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance@ was developed to address these concerns and one USDA response was the development of the Collaboration in Animal Health, Food Safety and Epidemiology (CAHFSE), a partnership among the Agriculture Research Service (ARS), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), and Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS. The objective of CAHFSE is to implement and expand a surveillance system patterned after the APHIS National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) which focuses on animal health and food safety. Swine is the first commodity in CAHFSE. To date, fecal samples from 8 farms have been collected and processed for culture of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Enterococci and E. coli. Preliminary results indicate that all four bacteria have been recovered from a number of operations and are currently being characterized

Repeated observations on the Salmonella culture status of midwest U.S. herds

Mesenteric lymph nodes were collected from pigs from 115 Midwest U.S. swine herds at slaughter on two occasions separated by 6-9 months. These herds were sampled up to three additional times during a three-year period, with 30 herds sampled five times. Thirty pigs were sampled at each collection. Herds were categorized positive if one or more samples revealed Salmonella spp. While culture status at collection one was associated with the second sampling collection (p \u3c 0.01), the association was only moderate in strength (OR = 2.6). Herds with three consecutive positive tests (9 of 38) were all positive on sample four. Prevalence estimates were weakly or not correlated between samplings. In conclusion, Salmonella culture status of these swine herds was weakly predictive of future culture results. Accurate description of Salmonella status based on bacterial culture appears to require repeated or ongoing testing

Antimicrobial resistance patterns of Salmonella isolates collected from slaughter age pigs

Salmonellae are ubiquitous in nature and are recovered from many animal species including swine. However, prevalence of specific serotypes can vary. Although carriage is often observed, fecal shedding can be sporadic (2). Salmonella, as well as other food borne pathogens, can be transferred from animals to the human population. However, since the federally mandated HACCP program has been implemented, a reduction in Salmonella among the major food animals has been observed

Effects of some methodologic factors on detection of Salmonella in swine feces

Bacteriologic culture of feces for Salmonella continues to be a central component of epidemiologic studies. We conducted a series of experiments on fecal samples collected from commercial swine farms to evaluate the effects of several methodologic factors on detection of Salmonella. Factors examined included fecal sample storage (no storage, 4C, -15C) and fecal sample weight. In addition we compared the standard method (Method I) used in our laboratory [JOg feces/buffered peptone water pre-enrichment/selective enrichment in Rappaport Vassiliadis (RV) broth] with another method (Method 2) used by ourselves and others in the USA (=I g sample/primary enrichments in tetrathionate and Hajna GN broths/secondary enrichment in RV broth). Inunediate processing of samples yielded the best recovery of Salmonella, although storage at 4C for 6 days did not significantly reduce detection. Freezing of fecal samples resulted in significant reduction of detection. The weight of feces sampled had a marked linear effect on the detection of Salmonella using method I. Direct comparison of Method I and Method 2 indicated comparable results, with Method I tending to yield higher detection of Salmonella. However, when conducted on samples of equal weight, Method 2 had significantly better detection than Method I. The choice of methods can markedly affect the results of fecal sample culture. The preferred methodology for epidemiologic studies will be determined by many factors including logistics and cost. Our data highlight the imperfect sensitivity of culture methods, and the need for researchers to consider the sensitivity of their bacteriologic methods in the design and interpretation of field studies based on fecal culture

Modulations of the Chicken Cecal Microbiome and Metagenome in Response to Anticoccidial and Growth Promoter Treatment

With increasing pressures to reduce or eliminate the use of antimicrobials for growth promotion purposes in production animals, there is a growing need to better understand the effects elicited by these agents in order to identify alternative approaches that might be used to maintain animal health. Antibiotic usage at subtherapeutic levels is postulated to confer a number of modulations in the microbes within the gut that ultimately result in growth promotion and reduced occurrence of disease. This study examined the effects of the coccidiostat monensin and the growth promoters virginiamycin and tylosin on the broiler chicken cecal microbiome and metagenome. Using a longitudinal design, cecal contents of commercial chickens were extracted and examined using 16S rRNA and total DNA shotgun metagenomic pyrosequencing. A number of genus-level enrichments and depletions were observed in response to monensin alone, or monensin in combination with virginiamycin or tylosin. Of note, monensin effects included depletions of Roseburia, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus, and enrichments in Coprococcus and Anaerofilum. The most notable effect observed in the monensin/virginiamycin and monensin/tylosin treatments, but not in the monensin-alone treatments, was enrichments in Escherichia coli. Analysis of the metagenomic dataset identified enrichments in transport system genes, type I fimbrial genes, and type IV conjugative secretion system genes. No significant differences were observed with regard to antimicrobial resistance gene counts. Overall, this study provides a more comprehensive glimpse of the chicken cecum microbial community, the modulations of this community in response to growth promoters, and targets for future efforts to mimic these effects using alternative approaches

USDA Multi-Agency Project: Collaboration in Animal Health, Food Safety & Epidemiology (CAHFSE)

Despite producer interventions, on-going research and continued surveillance, food borne outbreaks continue and multiple antimicrobial resistant bacteria have emerged. A multi-agency APublic Health Action Plan to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance@ was developed to address these concerns and one USDA response was the development of the Collaboration in Animal Health, Food Safety and Epidemiology (CAHFSE), a partnership among the Agriculture Research Service (ARS), Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), and Food Safety Inspection Service (FSIS. The objective of CAHFSE is to implement and expand a surveillance system patterned after the APHIS National Animal Health Monitoring System (NAHMS) which focuses on animal health and food safety. Swine is the first commodity in CAHFSE. To date, fecal samples from 8 farms have been collected and processed for culture of Salmonella, Campylobacter, Enterococci and E. coli. Preliminary results indicate that all four bacteria have been recovered from a number of operations and are currently being characterized.</p