Indexing left ventricular wall thickness to body surface area improves prognostic value

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149205/1/echo14317_am.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/149205/2/echo14317.pd

Comparison of ileofemoral arterial access size between noncontrast 3T MR angiography and contrast‐enhanced computed tomographic angiography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Peer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140012/1/jmri25651.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140012/2/jmri25651_am.pd

Impact of diastolic dysfunction severity on global left ventricular volumetric filling - assessment by automated segmentation of routine cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Objectives</p> <p>To examine relationships between severity of echocardiography (echo) -evidenced diastolic dysfunction (DD) and volumetric filling by automated processing of routine cine cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Cine-CMR provides high-resolution assessment of left ventricular (LV) chamber volumes. Automated segmentation (LV-METRIC) yields LV filling curves by segmenting all short-axis images across all temporal phases. This study used cine-CMR to assess filling changes that occur with progressive DD.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>115 post-MI patients underwent CMR and echo within 1 day. LV-METRIC yielded multiple diastolic indices - E:A ratio, peak filling rate (PFR), time to peak filling rate (TPFR), and diastolic volume recovery (DVR₈₀- proportion of diastole required to recover 80% stroke volume). Echo was the reference for DD.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>LV-METRIC successfully generated LV filling curves in all patients. CMR indices were reproducible (≤ 1% inter-reader differences) and required minimal processing time (175 ± 34 images/exam, 2:09 ± 0:51 minutes). CMR E:A ratio decreased with grade 1 and increased with grades 2-3 DD. Diastolic filling intervals, measured by DVR₈₀or TPFR, prolonged with grade 1 and shortened with grade 3 DD, paralleling echo deceleration time (p < 0.001). PFR by CMR increased with DD grade, similar to E/e' (p < 0.001). Prolonged DVR₈₀identified 71% of patients with echo-evidenced grade 1 but no patients with grade 3 DD, and stroke-volume adjusted PFR identified 67% with grade 3 but none with grade 1 DD (matched specificity = 83%). The combination of DVR₈₀and PFR identified 53% of patients with grade 2 DD. Prolonged DVR₈₀was associated with grade 1 (OR 2.79, CI 1.65-4.05, p = 0.001) with a similar trend for grade 2 (OR 1.35, CI 0.98-1.74, p = 0.06), whereas high PFR was associated with grade 3 (OR 1.14, CI 1.02-1.25, p = 0.02) DD.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Automated cine-CMR segmentation can discern LV filling changes that occur with increasing severity of echo-evidenced DD. Impaired relaxation is associated with prolonged filling intervals whereas restrictive filling is characterized by increased filling rates.</p

Aortic Annulus Diameter Determination by Multidetector Computed Tomography Reproducibility, Applicability, and Implications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

ObjectivesThis study sought to determine the most reproducible multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) measurements of the aortic annulus and to determine methods to improve the applicability of these measurements for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.BackgroundThe reproducibility and applicability of MDCT annular measurements to guide transcatheter aortic valve implantation remain unclear.MethodsAnnular measurements were performed in 50 patients planed for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in multiple planes: basal ring (short- and long-axis, mean diameter, area-derived diameter), coronal, sagittal, and 3-chamber projections. A theoretical model was developed taking into account the differences between the most reproducible MDCT measurements and transesophageal echocardiography to guide valve size choice.ResultsThe most reproducible measurements were the area-derived diameter and basal ring average diameter (inter-reader intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.87 [95% confidence interval: 0.81 to 0.92] and 0.80 [95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 0.87]; respectively; intrareader >0.90 for all readers). These were generally larger than transesophageal echocardiography diameters (mean difference of 1.5 ± 1.6 mm and 1.1 ± 1.7 mm, respectively). When a strategy of valve-sizing is undertaken using these CT measurements using an echocardiographic sizing scale, a different THV size would be selected in 44% and 40% of cases, respectively. When adjusting the sizing cutoffs to account for the differences in observed diameters, this was reduced to 10% to 12% (p < 0.01 for both, respectively).ConclusionsThe most reproducible MDCT measurements of the annulus are the area-derived diameter and basal ring average diameter, with derived values generally larger than those obtained with echocardiography. If MDCT is used for valve sizing, a strategy incorporating these differences may be important. MDCT using these easily derived measurements may be ideally suited to sizing transcatheter aortic valves as they account for the eccentricity of the aortic annulus, are reproducible, and are noninvasive

All-cause mortality benefit of coronary revascularization vs. medical therapy in patients without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry)

Aims To date, the therapeutic benefit of revascularization vs. medical therapy for stable individuals undergoing invasive coronary angiography (ICA) based upon coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) findings has not been examined. Methods and results We examined 15 223 patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing CCTA from eight sites and six countries who were followed for median 2.1 years (interquartile range 1.4-3.3 years) for an endpoint of all-cause mortality. Obstructive CAD by CCTA was defined as a ≥50% luminal diameter stenosis in a major coronary artery. Patients were categorized as having high-risk CAD vs. non-high-risk CAD, with the former including patients with at least obstructive two-vessel CAD with proximal left anterior descending artery involvement, three-vessel CAD, and left main CAD. Death occurred in 185 (1.2%) patients. Patients were categorized into two treatment groups: revascularization (n = 1103; 2.2% mortality) and medical therapy (n = 14 120, 1.1% mortality). To account for non-randomized referral to revascularization, we created a propensity score developed by logistic regression to identify variables that influenced the decision to refer to revascularization. Within this model (C index 0.92, χ2 = 1248, P < 0.0001), obstructive CAD was the most influential factor for referral, followed by an interaction of obstructive CAD with pre-test likelihood of CAD (P = 0.0344). Within CCTA CAD groups, rates of revascularization increased from 3.8% for non-high-risk CAD to 51.2% high-risk CAD. In multivariable models, when compared with medical therapy, revascularization was associated with a survival advantage for patients with high-risk CAD [hazards ratio (HR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.18-0.83], with no difference in survival for patients with non-high-risk CAD (HR 3.24, 95% CI 0.76-13.89) (P-value for interaction = 0.03). Conclusion In an intermediate-term follow-up, coronary revascularization is associated with a survival benefit in patients with high-risk CAD by CCTA, with no apparent benefit of revascularization in patients with lesser forms of CA

Body mass index and the prevalence, severity, and risk of coronary artery disease: an international multicentre study of 13,874 patients

AIMS: Obesity is associated with the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) risk factors and cardiovascular events. We examined the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the presence, extent, severity, and risk of CAD in patients referred for coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). METHODS AND RESULTS: We evaluated 13,874 patients from a prospective, international, multicentre registry of individuals without known CAD undergoing CCTA. We compared risk factors, CAD findings, and risk of all-cause mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) amongst individuals with underweight (18.5-20.0 kg/m(2)), normal (20.1-24.9 kg/m(2)), overweight (25-29.9 kg/m(2)), and obese (≥30 kg/m(2)) BMI. The mean follow-up was 2.4 ± 1.2 years with 143 deaths and 193 MIs. Among underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese individuals, there was increasing prevalence of diabetes (7 vs.10% vs. 12 vs. 19%), hypertension (37 vs. 40% vs. 46 vs. 59%), and hyperlipidaemia (48 vs. 52% vs. 56 vs. 56%; P < 0.001 for trend). After multivariable adjustment, BMI was positively associated with the prevalence of any CAD [odds ratio (OR) 1.25 per +5 kg/m(2), 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-1.30, P < 0.001] and obstructive (≥50% stenosis) CAD (OR: 1.13 per +5 kg/m(2), 95% CI: 1.08-1.19, P < 0.001); a higher BMI was also associated with an increased number of segments with plaque (+0.26 segments per +5 kg/m(2), 95% CI: 0.22-0.30, P < 0.001). Larger BMI categories were associated with an increase in all-cause mortality (P = 0.004), but no difference in non-fatal MI. After multivariable adjustment, a higher BMI was independently associated with increased risk of MI (hazards ratio: 1.28 per +5 kg/m(2), 95% CI: 1.12-1.45, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Amongst patients with suspected CAD referred for CCTA, individuals with increased BMI have greater prevalence, extent, and severity of CAD that is not fully explained by the presence of traditional risk factors. A higher BMI is independently associated with increased risk of intermediate-term risk of myocardial infarction