Dietary restriction in ILSXISS mice is associated with widespread changes in splicing regulatory factor expression levels.

This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record Dietary restriction (DR) represents one of the most reproducible interventions to extend lifespan and improve health outcomes in a wide range of species, but substantial variability in DR response has been observed, both between and within species. The mechanisms underlying this variation in effect are still not well characterised. Splicing regulatory factors have been implicated in the pathways linked with DR-induced longevity in C. elegans and are associated with lifespan itself in mice and humans. We used qRT-PCR to measure the expression levels of a panel of 20 age- and lifespan-associated splicing regulatory factors in brain, heart and kidney derived from three recombinant inbred strains of mice with variable lifespan responses to short-term (2 months) or long-term (10 months) 40% DR to determine their relationship to DR-induced longevity. We identified 3 patterns of association; i) splicing factors associated with DR alone, ii) splicing factors associated with strain alone or iii) splicing factors associated with both DR and strain. Tissue specific variation was noted in response to short term or long-term DR, with the majority of effects noted in brain following long term DR in the positive responder strain TejJ89. Association in heart and kidney were less evident, and occurred following short term DR. Splicing factors associated with both DR and strain may be mechanistically involved in strain-specific differences in response to DR. We provide here evidence concordant with a role for some splicing factors in the lifespan modulatory effects of DR across different mouse strains and in different tissues

On the Role of Faith in Sustainability Management: A Conceptual Model and Research Agenda

International audienceThe objective of this article is to develop a faith development perspective on corporate sustainability. A firm’s management of sustainability is arguably determined by the way decision-makers relate to the other and the natural environment, and this relationship is fundamentally shaped by faith. This study advances theoretical understanding of the approach managers take on sustainability issues by explaining how four distinct phases of faith development—improvidence, obedience, irreverence and providence—determine a manager’s disposition towards sustainability. Combining insights from intentional and relational faith development theories, the analysis reveals that a manager’s faith disposition can be measured according to four interrelated process criteria: (1) connectivity as a measure of a manager’s actual engagement and activities aimed at relating to sustainability; (2) inclusivity as a measure of who and what is included or excluded in a manager’s moral consideration; (3) emotional affinity as a measure of a manager’s sensitivity and affection towards the well-being of others and ecological welfare; and (4) reciprocity as a measure of the degree to which a manager is rewarded for responding to the needs and concerns of ‘Others’, mainly in the form of a positive emotional (and relational) stimulus. The conceptual model consolidates earlier scholarly works on the psychological drivers of sustainability management by illuminating our search for a process of faith development that connects with an increasingly complex understanding of the role of business in society