Is the formula of Traub still up to date in antemortem blood glucose level estimation?

According to the hypothesis of Traub, also known as the 'formula of Traub', postmortem values of glucose and lactate found in the cerebrospinal fluid or vitreous humor are considered indicators of antemortem blood glucose levels. However, because the lactate concentration increases in the vitreous and cerebrospinal fluid after death, some authors postulated that using the sum value to estimate antemortem blood glucose levels could lead to an overestimation of the cases of glucose metabolic disorders with fatal outcomes, such as diabetic ketoacidosis. The aim of our study, performed on 470 consecutive forensic cases, was to ascertain the advantages of the sum value to estimate antemortem blood glucose concentrations and, consequently, to rule out fatal diabetic ketoacidosis as the cause of death. Other biochemical parameters, such as blood 3-beta-hydroxybutyrate, acetoacetate, acetone, glycated haemoglobin and urine glucose levels, were also determined. In addition, postmortem native CT scan, autopsy, histology, neuropathology and toxicology were performed to confirm diabetic ketoacidosis as the cause of death. According to our results, the sum value does not add any further information for the estimation of antemortem blood glucose concentration. The vitreous glucose concentration appears to be the most reliable marker to estimate antemortem hyperglycaemia and, along with the determination of other biochemical markers (such as blood acetone and 3-beta-hydroxybutyrate, urine glucose and glycated haemoglobin), to confirm diabetic ketoacidosis as the cause of death

Preferred Fourth-Line Pharmacotherapy for Resistant Hypertension: Are We There Yet?

© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media New York. Resistant hypertension (RH) is defined as blood pressure (BP) that remains above target levels despite adherence to at least three different antihypertensive medications, typically including a diuretic. Epidemiological studies estimate that RH is increasing in prevalence, and is associated with detrimental health outcomes. The pathophysiology underlying RH is complex, involving multiple, overlapping contributors including activation of the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system, volume overload, endothelial dysfunction, behavioural and lifestyle factors. Hypertension guidelines currently recommend specific pharmacotherapy for 1st, 2nd and 3rd-line treatment, however no specific fourth-line pharmacotherapy is provided for those with RH. Rather, five different antihypertensive drug classes are generally suggested as possible alternatives, including: mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, a1-adrenergic antagonists, a2-adrenergic agonists, ß-blockers, and peripheral vasodilators. Each of these drug classes vary in their efficacy, tolerability and safety profile. This review summarises the available data on each of these drug classes as a potential fourth-line drug and reveals a lack of robust clinical evidence for preferred use of most of these classes in the setting of RH. Moreover, there is a lack of direct comparative trials that could assist in identifying a preferred fourth-line pharmacologic approach and in providing evidence for hypertensive guidelines for adequate treatment of RH