30 research outputs found

    Maintenance use of aspirin or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and prostate cancer risk

    No full text
    Background: Aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may have a preventive effect against prostate cancer. However, evidence is limited and still controversial, especially considering non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Methods: Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study including all long-term (>= 180 days) adult male users of aspirin (n = 419,931) or NSAIDs (n = 223,437) followed from the first dispense date until the first cancer diagnosis, death or 31 December 2012, whichever occurred first. The risk of prostate cancer was measured as standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), assessing duration of use, age and concomitant statins intake, comparing to the general male background population of the same age in Sweden. Results: The overall SIR suggests that maintenance use of aspirin decreases the risk of prostate cancer (SIR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.88), in particular if used >= 5 years (SIR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.30-0.32). The overall risk was decreased (SIR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.85-0.90) among other NSAIDs users, and again in particular among longer-term users (>= 3 years) with SIR = 0.58 (95% CI 0.53-0.63). When statins users were excluded from all aspirin users, there was no remaining association with prostate cancer (SIR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.96-1.02), only if taken >= 5 years (SIR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.29-0.34). For non-aspirin NSAIDs users, the protective effect remained after exclusion of statins users (SIR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.88-0.95). Conclusions: This population-based cohort study provides evidence for a protective effect of aspirin and other NSAIDs against prostate cancer, in particular for longer durations of use, yet concomitant use of statins strongly influences the risk among aspirin users

    Biolistic DNA delivery and its applications in Sorghum bicolor

    No full text
    Biolistic DNA delivery has been considered a universal tool for genetic manipulation to transfer exotic genes to cells or tissues due to its simplicity, versatility, and high efficiency. It has been a preferred method for investigating plant gene function in most monocot crops. The first transgenic sorghum plants were successfully regenerated through biolistic DNA delivery in 1993, with a relatively low transformation efficiency of 0.3%. Since then, tremendous progress has been made in recent years where the highest transformation efficiency was reported at 46.6%. Overall, the successful biolistic DNA delivery system is credited to three fundamental cornerstones: robust tissue culture system, effective gene expression in sorghum, and optimal parameters of DNA delivery. In this chapter, the history, application, and current development of biolistic DNA delivery in sorghum are reviewed, and the prospect of sorghum genetic engineering is discussed
    corecore