Patient-specific simulation of endovascular thoracic aortic repair: initial experience

Purpose: Endovascular thoracic aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the treatment modality of diverse aortic pathology. We report the use of patient-specific simulation using a dedicated PROcedure Rehearsal Studio (PRS) platform (Simbionix USA Corp, Cleveland, OH) before TEVAR and evaluate the feasibility and realism of this technology. Description: Virtual three-dimensional models of the patient’s relevant anatomy were reconstructed from computed tomography data. PRS was used in 2 patients before TEVAR. In a multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated how PRS compares with real TEVAR. Evaluation: PRS before TEVAR was feasible and demonstrated good correlation with the actual procedure. In the retrospective study, 16 patients were reconstructed (median duration, 26 minutes; interquartile range, 21 to 36 minutes). The realism of the simulated angiographies was rated highly (median, 4; interquartile range, 3 to 4). Final angiography revealed type I endoleak in 2 simulated cases and 1 real case. Conclusion: Patient-specific rehearsal before TEVAR is feasible and permits the creation of realistic case studies; however, software updates are required to improve face validity and to foster implementation in clinical practice

Patient-specific Rehearsal Before EVAR: Influence on Technical and Nontechnical Operative Performance. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of patient-specific virtual reality rehearsal (PsR) before endovascular infrarenal aneurysm repair (EVAR) on technical performance and procedural errors. BACKGROUND: Endovascular procedures, including EVAR, are executed in a complex multidisciplinary environment, often treating high-risk patients. Consequently, this may lead to patient harm and procedural inefficiency. PsR enables the endovascular team to evaluate and practice the case in a virtual environment before treating the real patient. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial recruited 100 patients with a nonruptured infrarenal aortic or iliac aneurysm between September 2012 and June 2014. Cases were randomized to preoperative PsR or standard care (no PsR). Primary outcome measures were errors during the real procedure and technical operative metrics (total endovascular and fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, number of angiograms, and radiation dose). RESULTS: There was a 26% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9%-40%, P = 0.004) reduction in minor errors, a 76% (95% CI 30%-92%, P = 0.009) reduction in major errors, and a 27% (95% CI 8.2%-42%, P = 0.007) reduction in errors causing procedural delay in the PsR group. The number of angiograms performed to visualize proximal and distal landing zones was 23% (95% CI 8%-36%, P = 0.005) and 21% (95% CI 7%-32%, P = 0.004) lower in the PsR group. CONCLUSIONS: PsR before EVAR can be used in different hospital settings by teams with various EVAR experience. It reduces perioperative errors and the number of angiograms required to deploy the stent graft, thereby reducing delays. Ultimately, it may improve patient safety and procedural efficiency