Learning Visual Context by Comparison

Finding diseases from an X-ray image is an important yet highly challenging task. Current methods for solving this task exploit various characteristics of the chest X-ray image, but one of the most important characteristics is still missing: the necessity of comparison between related regions in an image. In this paper, we present Attend-and-Compare Module (ACM) for capturing the difference between an object of interest and its corresponding context. We show that explicit difference modeling can be very helpful in tasks that require direct comparison between locations from afar. This module can be plugged into existing deep learning models. For evaluation, we apply our module to three chest X-ray recognition tasks and COCO object detection & segmentation tasks and observe consistent improvements across tasks. The code is available at https://github.com/mk-minchul/attend-and-compare.Comment: ECCV 2020 spotlight pape

Effect of Multiscale Processing in Digital Chest Radiography on Automated Detection of Lung Nodule with a Computer Assistance System

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of multiscale processing in digital chest radiography on automated detection of lung nodule with a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. The study involved 58 small-nodule patient cases and 58 normal cases. The 58 patient cases included a total of 64 noncalcified lung nodules up to 15 mm in diameter. Each case underwent an examination with a digital radiography system (Digital Diagnost, Philips Medical Systems), and the acquired image was processed by the following three types of multiscale processing (Unique Image Processing Package, Philips Medical Systems) respectively: (1) standard image from the default processing parameter (structure preference, 0.0), (2) high-pass image with structure preference of 0.4, (3) low-pass image with structure preference of −0.4. The CAD output images were produced with a real-time computer assistance system (IQQA™-Chest, EDDA Technology). Two experienced chest radiologists established the nodule gold standard by consensus reading according to computed tomography results, and analyzed and recorded the detection of lung nodules and false-positive detections of these CAD output images. For the entire cases involved (each case with three types of different processing), a total of 348 observations were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The mean area under the ROC curve (Az) value was 0.700 for the standard images, 0.587 for the high-pass images, and 0.783 for the low-pass images. There were statistically significant Az values among these three types of processed images (p < 0.01). Multiscale processing in digital chest radiography can affect the automated detection of lung nodule by CAD, which is consistent with effects from visual inspection

Observer training for computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in chest radiography

Item does not contain fulltextTo assess whether short-term feedback helps readers to increase their performance using computer-aided detection (CAD) for nodule detection in chest radiography.The 140 CXRs (56 with a solitary CT-proven nodules and 84 negative controls) were divided into four subsets of 35; each were read in a different order by six readers. Lesion presence, location and diagnostic confidence were scored without and with CAD (IQQA-Chest, EDDA Technology) as second reader. Readers received individual feedback after each subset. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) were calculated for readings with and without CAD with respect to change over time and impact of CAD.CAD stand-alone sensitivity was 59 \% with 1.9 false-positives per image. Mean AUC slightly increased over time with and without CAD (0.78 vs. 0.84 with and 0.76 vs. 0.82 without CAD) but differences did not reach significance. The sensitivity increased (65 \% vs. 70 \% and 66 \% vs. 70 \%) and specificity decreased over time (79 \% vs. 74 \% and 80 \% vs. 77 \%) but no significant impact of CAD was found.Short-term feedback does not increase the ability of readers to differentiate true- from false-positive candidate lesions and to use CAD more effectively.• Computer-aided detection (CAD) is increasingly used as an adjunct for many radiological techniques. • Short-term feedback does not improve reader performance with CAD in chest radiography. • Differentiation between true- and false-positive CAD for low conspicious possible lesions proves difficult. • CAD can potentially increase reader performance for nodule detection in chest radiography