Characterization of glenohumeral joint laxity and stiffness using instrumented arthrometry

The purpose of this study was to characterize glenohumeral joint laxity and stiffness using instrumented arthrometry. To evaluate the validity of an instrumented measurement system we compared cutaneous and bone-pinned measures of laxity and stiffness that replicate previously reported in vivo methodology. Characterization of capsular laxity was achieved through determination of the sagittal plane translational area at increasing levels of quantified force. Finally, a method for increasing the objectivity of the standard manual laxity examination was developed for the orthopaedic clinician to quantify humeral head translation and capsular volume in vivo. We hypothesized that: 1) cutaneous measures could accurately predict bone-pinned measures, 2) capsular laxity would increase with increasing levels of applied force, and 3) manual cutaneous, manual bone-pinned, and force-displacement bone-pinned measures of translation would be equal. Thirty fresh frozen cadaveric shoulder specimens (mean age=70±14 years) were tested. The shoulders were thawed and mounted to a custom-made shoulder-testing apparatus. Displacement was measured using an electromagnetic tracking system. Sensors were secured cutaneously and with bone-pins to the scapula and humerus. Force-displacement testing was performed using a load applicator and manual displacement testing utilized the anterior/posterior drawer and inferior sulcus tests. A comparison of cutaneous and bone-pinned measures of laxity and stiffness revealed good to excellent criterion validity (r=0.68 to 0.79). Examination of displacement measures at increasing levels of force revealed increasing capsular laxity with symmetric directional compliance. No significant difference was observed between anterior and posterior translation (0.4 mm, p=.55), with significant differences between inferior and anterior (4.6 mm, p<.0001) and between inferior and posterior (5.1 mm, p<.0001). A comparison of manual cutaneous to bone-pinned manual and kinetic measures of translation revealed a significant difference between methods (p=.0024) and between directions (p<.0001) with no significant interaction (p=.0948). Estimations of the force required to achieve clinical end-point suggest that greater force is required in the anterior (173 N) direction compared to posterior (123 N) and inferior (121 N). We have developed two new methods to measure glenohumeral joint kinematics and reported new information regarding normal kinematics of the glenohumeral joint

Instrumented measurement of glenohumeral joint laxity: reliability and normative data

This study assessed shoulder laxity using an instrumented arthrometer. We compared anterior and posterior translations at various force levels to determine the reliability of our measurement technique and to provide normative data in healthy shoulders. Fifty shoulders were assessed for glenohumeral joint laxity in two directions (anterior and posterior) and at four force levels (67, 89, 111, and 134 N). The dependent measure was joint displacement. Laxity values were widely, yet normally, distributed in our group of healthy shoulders. Intraclass correlation coefficients revealed excellent between-trial reliability (0.92) and fair between-session (0.73) and between-examiner (0.74) reliability. The average standard error of measurement between trials (0.56 mm), sessions (1.5 mm), and examiners (1.7 mm) demonstrated an unprecedentedly high degree of precision for quantifying glenohumeral joint laxity. Paired t tests revealed no significant laxity differences between sides ( P >0.05), indicating bilateral symmetry. A 2 (direction) × 4 (force) analysis of variance revealed significant differences in laxity between directions ( P <0.0001) and force levels ( P <0.0001). Our results show that our instrumented technique for quantifying glenohumeral joint laxity is precise and reproducible. Posterior translation was significantly greater than anterior, and a significant increase in translation was observed between increasing levels of force.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/41911/1/167-9-1-34_s001670000174.pd

Lawson criterion for ignition exceeded in an inertial fusion experiment

For more than half a century, researchers around the world have been engaged in attempts to achieve fusion ignition as a proof of principle of various fusion concepts. Following the Lawson criterion, an ignited plasma is one where the fusion heating power is high enough to overcome all the physical processes that cool the fusion plasma, creating a positive thermodynamic feedback loop with rapidly increasing temperature. In inertially confined fusion, ignition is a state where the fusion plasma can begin "burn propagation" into surrounding cold fuel, enabling the possibility of high energy gain. While "scientific breakeven" (i.e., unity target gain) has not yet been achieved (here target gain is 0.72, 1.37 MJ of fusion for 1.92 MJ of laser energy), this Letter reports the first controlled fusion experiment, using laser indirect drive, on the National Ignition Facility to produce capsule gain (here 5.8) and reach ignition by nine different formulations of the Lawson criterion

The Effect of Carbohydrate, Caffeine and Combined Rinses on College Aged Females’ Cycling Endurance Performance

Please view abstract in the attached PDF fil