Peer review in medical journals: beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process

Published medical research influences health care providers and policy makers, guides patient management, and is based on the peer review process. Peer review should prevent publication of unreliable data and improve study reporting, but there is little evidence that these aims are fully achieved. In the blinded systems, authors and readers do not know the reviewers' identity. Moreover, the reviewers' reports are not made available to readers. Anonymous peer review poses an ethical imbalance toward authors, who are judged by masked referees, and to the medical community and society at large, in case patients suffer the consequences of acceptance of flawed manuscripts or erroneous rejection of important findings. Some general medical journals have adopted an open process, require reviewers to sign their reports, and links online pre-publication histories to accepted articles. This system increases editors' and reviewers' accountability and allows public scrutiny, consenting readers understand on which basis were decisions taken and by whom. Moreover, this gives credit to reviewers for their apparently thankless job, as online availability of signed and scored reports may contribute to researchers' academic curricula. However, the transition from the blind to the open system could pose problems to journals. Reviewers may be more difficult to find, and publishers or medical societies could resist changes that may affect editorial costs and journals' revenues. Nonetheless, also considering the risk of competing interests in the medical field, general and major specialty journals could consider testing the effects of open review on manuscripts regarding studies that may influence clinical practice

The ominous association between severe endometriosis, in-vitro fertilisation, and placenta praevia : Raising awareness, limiting risks, informing women

Endometriosis is associated with several adverse pregnancy outcomes.(1) The most severe maternal complications are spontaneous haemoperitoneum in the second half of pregnancy and placenta praevia.(1) Spontaneous haemoperitoneum, mostly associated with endometriosis infiltrating the broad and uterosacral ligaments and the Douglas pouch, is a potentially fatal but rare event. Placenta praevia is more common,(1-3) and it is important to define its incidence, the association with different lesion types, the impact of additional risk factors, the potential obstetrical consequences, and the information that women should receive

Medical treatment in the management of deep endometriosis infiltrating the proximal rectum and sigmoid colon : a comprehensive literature review

A comprehensive literature review was performed to evaluate the effect of various hormonal therapies, in terms of variations of intestinal and pain complaints and of patient satisfaction with treatment, in women with symptomatic, non-severely sub-occlusive endometriosis infiltrating the proximal rectum and sigmoid colon. A MEDLINE search through PubMed from 2000 to 2018 was conducted to identify all original English language articles published on medical treatment for colorectal endometriosis. Additional reports were identified by systematically reviewing reference lists and using the "similar articles" function in PubMed. A total of 420 women with colorectal endometriosis treated with combined oral contraceptives, progestins, gonadotropin releasing-hormone (GnRH) agonists, and aromatase inhibitors have been described in eight case series, two retrospective cohort studies, and four case reports. Published data consistently suggest that several hormonal medications can control most symptoms associated with intestinal endometriosis, provided the relative bowel lumen stenosis is less than 60%. Patients with irritative-type symptoms appear to respond better than those with constipation. Overall, about two thirds of women were satisfied with the treatment received, independently of the drug used. Progestins are the compound supported by the largest body of evidence. The addition of aromatase inhibitors or, alternatively, the use of GnRH agonists, do not seem to be associated with better outcomes. Long-term treatment with a progestin should be proposed as an alternative to surgery to patients with non-severely sub-occlusive endometriosis infiltrating the proximal rectum and sigmoid colon not seeking conception. The final decision should be shared together with the woman, respecting her preferences and priorities

Advances in the medical management of bowel endometriosis

Endometriosis infiltrating the bowel can be treated medically in accurately selected women not seeking conception and without overt obstructive symptomatology. When the rectosigmoid junction is involved, the probabilities of intestinal symptoms relief, undergoing surgery after treatment failure, and developing bowel obstruction during hormonal treatment are around 70%, 10%, and 1-2%, respectively. When the lesion infiltrates exclusively the mid-rectum, thus in cases of true rectovaginal endometriosis, the probabilities of intestinal symptoms relief and undergoing surgery are about 80% and 3%, respectively. Endometriotic obstructions of the rectal ampulla have not been reported. A rectosigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy should be performed systematically before starting medical therapies, also to rule out malignant tumours arising from the intestinal mucosa. Progestogens are safe, generally effective, well-tolerated, inexpensive, and should be considered as first-line medications for bowel endometriosis. Independently of symptom relief, intestinal lesions should be checked periodically to exclude nodule progression during hormonal treatment

Medical treatment of endometriosis-related pain

Available medical treatments for symptomatic endometriosis act by inhibiting ovulation, reducing serum oestradiol levels, and suppressing uterine blood flows. To this aim, several drugs can be used, with a similar magnitude of effect, in term of pain relief, independently of the mechanism of action. Conversely, safety, tolerability, and cost differ. Medications for endometriosis can be categorised into low-cost drugs, including OCs and most progestogens, and high cost drugs, including dienogest and GnRH agonists. As the individual response to different drugs is variable, a stepwise approach is suggested, starting with OCs or low-cost progestogens, and stepping up to high-cost drugs only in case of inefficacy or intolerance. Oral contraceptives may be used in women with dysmenorrhoea as their main complaint, and when only superficial peritoneal implants or ovarian endometriomas < 5 cm are present, while progestogens should be preferred in women with severe deep dyspareunia and when infiltrating lesions are identified

Surgery versus hormonal therapy for deep endometriosis : is it a choice of the physician?

Deep endometriosis, occurring approximately in 1% of women of reproductive age, represents the most severe form of endometriosis. It causes severe pain in the vast majority of affected women and it can affect the bowel and the urinary tract. Hormonal treatment of deep endometriosis with progestins, such as norethindrone acetate or dienogest, or estroprogestins is effective in relieving pain in more than 90% of women at one year follow up. Progestins and estroprogestins can be safely administered in the long-term, may be not expensive and are usually well tolerated. Therefore, they should represent the first-line treatment of deep endometriosis associated pain in women not seeking natural conception. However, hormonal treatment is ineffective or not tolerated in about 30% of women, the most common side effects being erratic bleeding, weight gain, decreased libido and headache. Surgical excision of deep endometriosis is mandatory in presence of symptomatic bowel stenosis, ureteral stenosis with secondary hydronephrosis, and when hormonal treatments fail. Surgical treatment is similarly effective as compared to hormonal treatment in relieving dismenorhea, dyspareunia and dyschezia at one year follow up in more than 90% of women with deep endometriosis. Surgical removal of the nodules may require resection of the bowel, ureter or bladder, with possible severe complications such as rectovaginal or ureterovaginal fistula and anastomotic leakage. A thorough counsel with the patient is necessary in order to pursue a therapeutic plan centered not on the endometriotic lesions, but on the patient's symptoms, priorities and expectations

A woman&apos;s worth: The psychological impact of beliefs about motherhood, female identity, and infertility on childless women with endometriosis

In this study, we examined whether beliefs regarding motherhood, female identity, and infertility affected the psychological health of 127 childless endometriosis patients. Anxiety and depression were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, while self-esteem was assessed using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. A set of six Likert-type items (1\u2009=\u2009"Not at all"; 5\u2009=\u2009"To a very great extent") was developed to explore women's beliefs. Women who were more likely to believe that childless and infertile women were less appreciated by others reported poorer psychological health. Patients' beliefs should be explored during psychological counseling. Dysfunctional beliefs about female identity, especially as regards others' perceptions, should be restructured to improve patients' psychological health

The complex interface between economy and healthcare : An introductory overview for clinicians

In a period of generalized economic crisis, it seems particularly appropriate to try to manage a continuing growing sector such as healthcare in the best possible way. The crucial aim of optimization of available healthcare resources is obtaining the maximum possible benefit with the minimum expenditure. This has important social implications, whether individual citizens or tax-funded national health services eventually have to pay the bill. The keyword here is efficiency, which means either, maximizing the benefit from a fixed sum of money, or minimizing the resources required for a defined benefit. In order to achieve these objectives, economic evaluation is a helpful tool. Five different types of economic evaluation exist in the health-care field: cost-minimization, cost-benefit, cost-consequences, cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis. The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the principal methods used for economic evaluation in healthcare. Economic evaluation represents a starting point for the allocation of resources, the decision of the valuable investments and the division of budgets across different health programs. Moreover, economic evaluation allows the comparison of different procedures in terms of quality of life and life expectancy, bearing in mind that cost-effectiveness is only one of multiple facets in the decision making-process. Economic evaluation is important to critically evaluate clinical interventions and ensure that we are implementing the most cost-effective management protocols. Clinicians are called to fulfill the complex task of optimizing the use of resources, and, at the same time, improving the quality of healthcare assistance

Probiotics and vaginal microecology: fact or fancy?

BACKGROUND: Probiotics are live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, should confer a health benefit to the host. Media sources tend to present probiotics as an appealing health promotion method able to prevent or treat a wide variety of clinical conditions. In obstetrics and gynaecology, Lactobacilli species are mainly used to restore the physiologic vaginal microbiota in order to treat bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and prevent preterm birth. DISCUSSION: Several RCTs investigated the potential benefits of probiotics in gynaecological and obstetrics conditions. For all potential indications, recent specific meta-analyses have been published. Considering vulvovaginal candidiasis in non-pregnant women, probiotics slightly improved the short-term clinical and mycological cure, and reduced the 1-month relapse. However, no important impact of probiotic use was observed on long-term clinical or mycological cure. Similarly, the addition of probiotics to metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis was not shown to provide any additional benefit. In obstetrics, using probiotics during pregnancy neither decreased nor increased the risk of preterm birth before 34\u2009weeks or before 37\u2009weeks. Similarly, no benefits emerged for gestational diabetes, preterm premature rupture of membrane, and small and large for gestational age infants. CONCLUSION: Despite increasing marketing of probiotics for the treatment of vulvovaginal candidiasis and prevention of preterm birth robust evidence demonstrating a beneficial effect is scarce. Moreover, there was considerable heterogeneity among the different studies in terms of route of administration, strain/s of probiotic adopted, and length of probiotic use. Before recommending the systematic use of probiotics to treat bacterial vaginosis and VVC and prevent preterm birth, high-quality research is needed. Professional medical associations should issue recommendations defining if, when, and how probiotics should be used for gynaecological disorders