12 research outputs found

    Insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: Impact of obesity on sensing quality and safety

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND Fat layers in obese patients can impair R-wave detection and diagnostic performance of a subcutaneous insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). We compared safety and ICM sensing quality between obese patients [body mass index (BMI) ≄ 30 kg/m2^{2}] and normal-weight controls (BMI <30 kg/m2^{2}) in terms of R-wave amplitude and time in noise mode (noise burden) detected by a long-sensing-vector ICM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients from two multicentre, non-randomized clinical registries are included in the present analysis on January 31, 2022 (data freeze), if the follow-up period was at least 90 days after ICM insertion, including daily remote monitoring. The R-wave amplitudes and daily noise burden averaged intraindividually for days 61-90 and days 1-90, respectively, were compared between obese patients (n = 104) and unmatched (n = 268) and a nearest-neighbour propensity score (PS) matched (n = 69) normal-weight controls. RESULTS The average R-wave amplitude was significantly lower in obese (median 0.46 mV) than in normal-weight unmatched (0.70 mV, P < 0.0001) or PS-matched (0.60 mV, P = 0.003) patients. The median noise burden was 1.0% in obese patients, which was not significantly higher than in unmatched (0.7%; P = 0.056) or PS-matched (0.8%; P = 0.133) controls. The rate of adverse device effects during the first 90 days did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSION Although increased BMI was associated with reduced signal amplitude, also in obese patients the median R-wave amplitude was >0.3 mV, a value which is generally accepted as the minimum level for adequate R-wave detection. The noise burden and adverse event rates did not differ significantly between obese and normal-weight patients.Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04075084 and NCT04198220

    Insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: Impact of obesity on sensing quality and safety

    Get PDF
    BackgroundFat layers in obese patients can impair R-wave detection and diagnostic performance of a subcutaneous insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). We compared safety and ICM sensing quality between obese patients [body mass index (BMI) ≄ 30 kg/m2] and normal-weight controls (BMI &lt;30 kg/m2) in terms of R-wave amplitude and time in noise mode (noise burden) detected by a long-sensing-vector ICM.Materials and methodsPatients from two multicentre, non-randomized clinical registries are included in the present analysis on January 31, 2022 (data freeze), if the follow-up period was at least 90 days after ICM insertion, including daily remote monitoring. The R-wave amplitudes and daily noise burden averaged intraindividually for days 61–90 and days 1–90, respectively, were compared between obese patients (n = 104) and unmatched (n = 268) and a nearest-neighbour propensity score (PS) matched (n = 69) normal-weight controls.ResultsThe average R-wave amplitude was significantly lower in obese (median 0.46 mV) than in normal-weight unmatched (0.70 mV, P &lt; 0.0001) or PS-matched (0.60 mV, P = 0.003) patients. The median noise burden was 1.0% in obese patients, which was not significantly higher than in unmatched (0.7%; P = 0.056) or PS-matched (0.8%; P = 0.133) controls. The rate of adverse device effects during the first 90 days did not differ significantly between groups.ConclusionAlthough increased BMI was associated with reduced signal amplitude, also in obese patients the median R-wave amplitude was &gt;0.3 mV, a value which is generally accepted as the minimum level for adequate R-wave detection. The noise burden and adverse event rates did not differ significantly between obese and normal-weight patients.Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04075084 and NCT04198220

    Histoire et langage : travaux allemands en lexicologie historique et en histoire conceptuelle

    No full text
    Gumbrecht Hans Ulrich, LĂŒsebrink Hans-JĂŒrgen, Reichardt Rolf. Histoire et langage : travaux allemands en lexicologie historique et en histoire conceptuelle. In: Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine, tome 30 N°2, Avril-juin 1983. pp. 185-195

    Civilisation allemande

    No full text
    Produit d’un dĂ©bat entre germanistes français, spĂ©cialistes de « civilisation allemande », et romanistes allemands, spĂ©cialistes de « Landeskunde » ou « Landeswissenschaft », cet ouvrage fait le point sur les Ă©volutions de ces disciplines dans les mondes universitaires français et allemand. Une premiĂšre rencontre en 1988 Ă  Versailles a Ă©tĂ© suivie d’une autre Ă  Berlin, en 2010. Riche d’une longue tradition dans l’enseignement et la recherche, la « civilisation allemande » est bien Ă©tablie en France, ses thĂšmes de recherche sont en pleine Ă©volution. La « Landeskunde » Ă©tait plutĂŽt perçue en Allemagne comme un domaine auxiliaire de la « Romanistik ». Le terme avec ceux de « Landeswissenschaft » et « Frankreichstudien » (Ă©tudes françaises) ont aujourd’hui presque disparu du profil des postes Ă  pourvoir, ils ont Ă©tĂ© remplacĂ©s par celui de « Kulturwissenschaft », « sciences culturelles », liĂ© Ă  celui de « science littĂ©raire ». Cette combinaison s’est rĂ©vĂ©lĂ©e trompeuse : dans la pratique, la « civilisation française » se rĂ©fĂšre Ă  un modĂšle d’enseignement traditionnel de littĂ©rature française mĂątinĂ© de sciences culturelles lĂ  oĂč il devrait s’agir, pour reprendre Helene Harth, d’instaurer « une coopĂ©ration interdisciplinaire avec d’autres philologies et d’autres disciplines comme l’histoire, la sociologie, l’histoire de l’art et l’histoire mĂ©diatique (pour transmettre aux Ă©tudiants) un savoir sur les cultures des diffĂ©rents pays europĂ©ens, qui leur permette de comprendre les diffĂ©rents processus historiques des Ă©changes culturels actuels. » Ces enjeux sont au centre de ce livre sur fond de transformation des sociĂ©tĂ©s française et allemande

    Table1_Insertable cardiac monitor with a long sensing vector: Impact of obesity on sensing quality and safety.docx

    No full text
    BackgroundFat layers in obese patients can impair R-wave detection and diagnostic performance of a subcutaneous insertable cardiac monitor (ICM). We compared safety and ICM sensing quality between obese patients [body mass index (BMI) ≄ 30 kg/m2] and normal-weight controls (BMI 2) in terms of R-wave amplitude and time in noise mode (noise burden) detected by a long-sensing-vector ICM.Materials and methodsPatients from two multicentre, non-randomized clinical registries are included in the present analysis on January 31, 2022 (data freeze), if the follow-up period was at least 90 days after ICM insertion, including daily remote monitoring. The R-wave amplitudes and daily noise burden averaged intraindividually for days 61–90 and days 1–90, respectively, were compared between obese patients (n = 104) and unmatched (n = 268) and a nearest-neighbour propensity score (PS) matched (n = 69) normal-weight controls.ResultsThe average R-wave amplitude was significantly lower in obese (median 0.46 mV) than in normal-weight unmatched (0.70 mV, P ConclusionAlthough increased BMI was associated with reduced signal amplitude, also in obese patients the median R-wave amplitude was >0.3 mV, a value which is generally accepted as the minimum level for adequate R-wave detection. The noise burden and adverse event rates did not differ significantly between obese and normal-weight patients.Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04075084 and NCT04198220.</p

    Literaturverzeichnis

    No full text
    corecore