How much space is needed for decompressive surgery in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: Enabling single-stage surgery.

INTRODUCTION Decompressive hemicraniectomy (DCE) is routinely performed for intracranial pressure control after malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarction. Decompressed patients are at risk of traumatic brain injury and the syndrome of the trephined until cranioplasty. Cranioplasty after DCE is itself associated with high complication rates. Single-stage surgical strategies may eliminate the need for follow-up surgery while allowing for safe brain expansion and protection from environmental factors. RESEARCH QUESTION Assess the volume needed for safe expansion of the brain to enable single-stage surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective radiological and volumetric analysis of all patients that had DCE in our clinic between January 2009 and December 2018 and met inclusion criteria. We investigated prognostic parameters in perioperative imaging and assessed clinical outcome. RESULTS Of 86 patients with DCE, 44 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Median brain swelling was 75.35 mL (8.7-151.2 mL). Median bone flap volume was 113.3 mL (73.34-146.1 mL). Median brain swelling was 1.62 mm below the previous outer rim of the skull (5.3 mm to -2.19 mm). In 79.6% of the patients, the volume of removed bone alone was equivalent to or larger than the additional intracranial volume needed for brain swelling. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The space provided by removal of the bone alone was sufficient to match the expansion of the injured brain after malignant MCA infarction in the vast majority of our patientsA subgaleal space-expanding flap with a minimal offset can provide protection from trauma and atmospheric pressure without compromising brain expansion

Outcome of kidney transplantation from very senior donors in Switzerland – a national cohort study

Kidney transplantation from older and marginal donors is effective to confront organ shortage. However, limitations after transplantation of kidneys from very marginal kidney donors remain unclear. We compared patient and graft outcome, achieved allograft function and quality of life of renal transplantations from Very Senior Donors (VSD, defined as donors aged 70 years and older) with Senior Donors (SD, aged 60–70 years) and Regular Donors (RD, aged younger than 60 years) in Switzerland. We evaluated the outcome of 1554 adult recipients of deceased donor kidney transplantations from 05/2008 to 12/2019; median follow-up was 4.7 years. Failure-free survival (freedom from graft loss or death), glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and quality of life at 12 months were analyzed for RD (reference group, n = 940), SD (n = 404), and VSD (n = 210). Failure-free survival decreased with increasing donor age, mainly attributable to premature graft loss. Still, overall 5-year failure-free survival reached 83.1%, 81.0%, and 64.0% in the RD, SD, and VSD subgroups, respectively. eGFR 12 months post-transplantation was significantly higher in RD compared with SD and VSD. The acceptance rate of donor candidates for kidney TPL was 78% for the entire cohort (87% for RD, 79% for SD, and 56% for VSD). Deceased donor kidney transplantation from donors aged 70 years or older is associated with an inferior, yet acceptable failure-free outcome, with sustained quality of life