Optimal timing of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance left atrial angiography before pulmonary vein ablation

Background: To achieve high image quality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) pulmonary vein (PV) angiography prior catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation, optimal timing of the angiographic sequence during contrast agent passage is important. The present study identified influential cardiovascular parameters for prediction of contrast agent travel time.Methods: One hundred six consecutive patients underwent a CMR examination including three-dimensional (3D) contrast-enhanced PV angiography with real-time bolus tracking prior to catheter ablation. Correct scan timing was characterized by relative signal enhancement measurements in the pulmonary artery, left atrium (LA), and ascending aorta. Furthermore, left- and right-ventricular function, left- and right-atrial dimensions, presence of mitral or tricuspid insufficiencies, and main pulmonary artery diameter were determined.Results: The highest relative signal enhancement in LA demonstrated optimal scan timing. Contrast agent travel time showed wide variability (range: 12–42 s; mean: 18 ± 4 s). On univariate analysis, most cardiovascular parameters correlated with contrast agent travel time while on multivariate analysis left- and right-ventricular function remained the only independent predictors, but overall a poor fit to the data (adjusted R2, 27.5%) was found.Conclusions: Contrast agent travel time was mainly influenced by left- and right-ventricular function but prediction models poorly fitted the data. Thus, 3D PV angiography prior to PV ablation procedures necessitates real-time assessment, with visual determination of individual contrast agent passage time to ensure consistently high CMR image quality

Grading of aortic regurgitation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and pulsed Doppler of the left subclavian artery: harmonizing grading scales between imaging modalities

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) are current standard for assessing aortic regurgitation (AR). Regurgitant fraction (RF) can also be estimated by Doppler examination of the left subclavian artery (LSA-Doppler). However, a comparison of AR grading scales using these methods and a TTE multiparametric approach as reference is lacking. We evaluated the severity of AR in 73 patients (58 ± 15 years; 57 men), with a wide spectrum of AR of the native valve. Using a recommended TTE multiparametric approach the AR was divided in none/trace (n = 12), mild (n = 23), moderate (n = 12), and severe (n = 26). RF was evaluated by LSA-Doppler (ratio between diastolic and systolic velocity-time integrals) and by CMR phase-contrast imaging (performed in the aorta 1 cm above the aortic valve); the grading scales were then calculated. There were a good correlation between all methods, but mean RF values were greater with TTE compared with LSA-Doppler and CMR (39 ± 16% vs. 35 ± 18% vs. 32 ± 20%, respectively; p < 0.037). Mean differences in RF values between methods were significant in the groups with mild and moderate AR. Grading scales that best defined the TTE derived AR severity using CMR were: mild, < 21%; moderate, 22 to 41%; and severe, > 42%; and using LSA-Doppler: mild, < 29%; moderate, 30 to 44%; and severe, > 45%. RF values for AR grading using TTE, LSA-Doppler and CMR correlate well but differ in groups with mild and moderate AR when using a recognized multiparametric echocardiographic approach. Clinical prospective studies should validate these proposed modality adjusted grading scales

Quantification of regurgitation in mitral valve prolapse with automated real time echocardiographic 3D proximal isovelocity surface area: multimodality consistency and role of eccentricity index

Three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (3D-TTE) provides a semi-automated proximal isovelocity surface area method (3D-PISA) to obtain quantitative parameters. Data assessing regurgitation severity in mitral valve prolapse (MVP) are scarce, so we assessed the 3D-PISA method compared with 2D-PISA and cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and the role of an eccentricity index. We evaluated the 3D-PISA method for assessing MR in 54 patients with MVP (57 ± 14 years; 42 men; 12 mild/mild-moderate; 12 moderate-severe; and 30 severe MR). Role of an asymmetric (i.e. eccentricity index ≥ 1.25) flow convergence region (FCR) and inter-modality consistency were then assessed. 3D-PISA derived regurgitant volume (RVol) showed a good correlation with 2D-PISA and CMR derived parameters (r = 0.86 and r = 0.81, respectively). The small mean differences with 2D-PISA derived RVol did not reach statistical significance in overall population (5.7 ± 23 ml, 95% CI - 0.6 to 12; p = 0.08) but differed in those with asymmetric 3D-FCR (n = 21; 2D-PISA: 72 ± 36 ml vs. 3D-PISA: 93 ± 47 ml; p = 0.001). RVol mean values were higher using PISA methods (CMR 57 ± 33 ml; 2D-PISA 73 ± 39 ml; and 3D-PISA 79 ± 45 ml) and an overestimation was observed when CMR was used as reference (2D-PISA vs. CMR: mean difference: 15.8 ml [95% CI 10-22, p < 0.001]; and 3D-PISA vs. CMR: 21.5 ml [95% CI 14-29, p < 0.001]). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was excellent (ICC 0.91-0.99), but with numerically lower coefficient of variation for 3D-PISA (8%-10% vs. 2D-PISA: 12%-16%). 3D-PISA method for assessing regurgitation in MVP may enable analogous evaluation compared to standard 2D-PISA, but with overestimation in case of asymmetric FCR or when CMR is used as reference method