Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)1.

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field

The seed endosphere of Anadenanthera colubrina is inhabited by a complex microbiota, including Methylobacteriumspp. and Staphylococcus spp. with potential plant-growth promoting activities

Background and aims Plant seeds are emerging micro–habitats, whose importance as reservoir and vector of beneficial microbes just begins to be recognized. Here we aimed to characterize the bacterial microbiota of the Anadenanthera colubrina seed endosphere, with special focus to beneficial traits and to the colonization pattern. Methods Cultivation–dependent (isolation from surface–sterilized seeds) and cultivation–independent (pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene from metagenomic seed DNA) analyses, functional tests and microscopical investigations (fluorescence in situ hybridization coupled with confocal laser scanning microscopy (FISH-CLSM) were performed. Results We isolated several Methylobacterium and Staphylococcus spp., exhibiting both plant growth promotion and antimicrobial activities. The two taxonomic groups showed complementary traits, which supports a functional selection. Both genera were detected also by pyrosequencing, together with further taxa. The genera Friedmaniella, Bifidobacterium, Delftia, Anaerococcus and Actinomyces appeared here for the first time as seed endophytes. We detected bacterial cells and micro–colonies in seed cryosections by FISHCLSM. Alphaproteobacteria, Firmicutes and other bacteria colonized intercellular spaces of the parenchyma and associated to transport vessels. Conclusions This work sheds light onto the diversity, functions and colonization pattern of the Anadenanthera colubrina seed endophytes, and strongly suggest a role as beneficial partners for seed-associated microbiot