14 research outputs found

    Medicaid and Medicare Part B spending on immunomodulators and biosimilars

    No full text
    Introduction: Prices for immunomodulators used in dermatological conditions are rising in the United States. While Medicare Part-D solely covers medication costs, Medicare Part-B covers outpatient infusion and injection costs given by medical professionals. We aim to analyze recent trends in Medicare Part-B spending on immunomodulators and their biosimilars used in the treatment of common chronic inflammatory dermatoses. Methods: The 2012–2018 Medicare Part-B spending data on immunomodulators commonly used for dermatologic conditions were extracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database. Inflation was adjusted to reflect 2012-dollar amounts using the Consumer Price Index. Results: Medicare Part-B spending has increased by 27.5% from 2012 to 2018 (2.5B,2.5B, 3.2B). Average annual total spending (AATS) is greatest for rituximab (1,522,757,520),andaverageannualspendingpermaintenancedose(AASPMD)isgreatestforustekinumab90mg(1,522,757,520), and average annual spending per maintenance dose (AASPMD) is greatest for ustekinumab-90 mg (12,976). The percent change in AASPMD increased for all immunomodulators with Etanercept-50 mg having the greatest percent change (+64.6%, +$285.70). Infliximab had a greater AATS and AASPMD than its biosimilars. Discussion: Medicare Part-B spending is often overlooked but plays a big role in federal healthcare spending. Exploring the strategic use of less expensive biosimilars could help mitigate spending.12 month embargo; first published online 18 February 2021This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at [email protected]

    Proceeding report of the fourth Symposium on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Advances (SHSA) 2019

    No full text
    The 4th Annual Symposium on Hidradenitis Suppurativa (SHSA) took place on 1-3 November 2019 at the Westin Book Cadillac Hotel in Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A. This symposium was a joint meeting of the United States Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (HSF) and the Canadian Hidradenitis Suppurativa Foundation (CHSF). This cross- disciplinary meeting with experts from around the world was an opportunity to discuss the most recent advances in the study of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) pathogenesis, clinical trials, classification, scoring systems, complementary/ alternative medical treatments (CAM), diet, pain management, surgical and laser treatment, and ultrasound assessment. A special pre-conference workshop was held on the use of neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser hair reduction, sinus tract deroofing, carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser excision with ultrasound mapping and tumescent anesthesia for the treatment of HS. The focused workshops on establishing an HS clinic, setting up an HS support group, Hidradenitis Suppurativa PRospective Observational REgistry and bioSpecimen RepoSitory (HS PROGRESS), and wound care were held during the meeting. A special program called HS Ambassadors was established for patients who may have questions about the conference presentations and in addition, a meet and greet for patients and HS Ambassadors was arranged. To facilitate networking between those early in their career and clinical and research experts, a mentoring reception was held

    Factors Associated with Eczema Clinical Trial Awareness, Interest, and Participation in Adults

    No full text
    Despite the need for improved eczema therapies and a rapid increase in available eczema clinical trials, participation remains low. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with clinical trial awareness, interest, and barriers to enrolment and participation. An online survey, administered 1 May to 6 June 2020 to adults (≥ 18 years) with eczema in the USA, was analysed. Among 800 patients included, mean age was 49.4 years, most respondents were female (78.1%), White (75.4%), non-Hispanic (91.4%), and geographically living in an urban/suburban area (Rural-Urban Continuum Codes (RUCC) 1–3, 90.8%). Only 9.7% of respondents reported previous participation in clinical trials, while 57.1% had considered participation and 33.2% never considered participation. Higher satisfaction with current eczema therapy, clinical trial literacy, and confidence in finding eczema trial information were all associated with clinical trial awareness, interest, and successful participation. Younger age and having atopic dermatitis were associated with increased awareness, while female gender was a barrier to interest and successful participation
    corecore