35 research outputs found
Aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian Archimedean Preferences: Arrovian Impossibility Results
The United Kingdom and British Empire: A Figurational Approach
Drawing upon the work of Norbert Elias and the process [figurational] sociology perspective, this article examines how state formation processes are related to, and, affected by, expanding and declining chains of international interdependence. In contrast to civic and ethnic conceptions, this approach focuses on the emergence of the nation/nation-state as grounded in broader processes of historical and social development. In doing so, state formation processes within the United Kingdom are related to the expansion and decline of the British Empire. That is, by focusing on the functional dynamics that are embedded in collective groups, one is able to consider how the UK’s ‘state’ and ‘imperial’ figurations were interdependently related to changes in both the UK and the former British Empire. Consequently, by locating contemporary UK relations in the historical context of former imperial relationships, nationalism studies can go ‘beyond’ the nation/nation-state in order to include broader processes of imperial expansion and decline. Here, the relationship between empire and nationalism can offer a valuable insight into contemporary political movements, especially within former imperial groups
Situation, Figuration und Gewalt. Versuch eines gewaltsoziologischen Dialoges zwischen Randall Collins und Norbert Elias am Beispiel sexueller Kriegsgewalt
Ebner J, Stopfinger M. Situation, Figuration und Gewalt. Versuch eines gewaltsoziologischen Dialoges zwischen Randall Collins und Norbert Elias am Beispiel sexueller Kriegsgewalt. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 2020;45(S1):43-67.In diesem Beitrag werden zwei in der soziologischen Gewaltforschung etablierte Ansätze – die mikrosoziologisch-situationistische Gewalttheorie von Randall Collins und die figurations- bzw. prozesssoziologische Perspektive von Norbert Elias – auf ihre Eignung für die Analyse von sexueller Kriegsgewalt überprüft. Nach einer kurzen Diskussion des Forschungsstandes zu sexueller Kriegsgewalt wird dieses Thema einmal mit Collins und einmal mit Elias beleuchtet. Danach werden die beiden Zugänge einander gegenübergestellt, um Unterschiede und Gemeinsamkeiten herauszuarbeiten. Darauf aufbauend wird versucht, die Fruchtbarkeit eines „pragmatischen Dialoges“ zwischen einem mikro- und einem figurationssoziologisch inspirierten Ansatz auszuloten. Abschließend wird diskutiert, welche Folgerungen sich daraus für die Forschung zu sexueller Kriegsgewalt ergeben.In this paper, two approaches established in sociological violence research – Randall Collins’ micro-sociological theory of violence and Norbert Elias’ figuration- and process-sociological perspective—are examined for their suitability for the analysis of sexual violence in war. After a brief discussion of the current state of research on sexual violence in war, this topic will be examined once with Collins and once with Elias. The two approaches are then juxtaposed in order to highlight differences and similarities. Building on this, the fruitfulness of a “pragmatic dialogue” between a micro- and a figuration-sociologically inspired approach will be explored. The concluding section discusses the implications for research on sexual violence in war