3 research outputs found
‘Q-storming’ to identify challenges and opportunities for integrating health and climate adaptation measures in Africa
INTRODUCTION : Climate factors influence the state of human health and wellbeing. Climate-related threats are
particularly being experienced by vulnerable populations in Africa. A Question (Q)-Storming session was
convened at an international climate adaptation conference. It promoted dialog among a diverse spectrum of
researchers, climate and medical scientists, health professionals, national government officials, civil society,
business, and international governing organizations. The session identified approaches for the effective integration of health within African national climate adaptation policies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS : Two organizations partnered to convene the session at the Adaptations Futures 2018
Conference in Cape Town. Q-storming (which is an inverse approach to brainstorming) was applied to extract
ideas from all participants. Four topics were presented during the session: (i) adaptive capacities related to
climate change and infectious diseases; (ii) adaptive capacity of African governments in relation to health
and climate change; (iii) making climate science work to protect the health of vulnerable populations; and
(iv) making climate-health research usable.
RESULTS : Nine cross-cutting adaptation themes were generated (i.e. key definitions, adaptive capacity, health
sector priorities, resources, operational capacities and procedures, contextual conditions, information pathways, and information utility). The Q-Storming approach was a valuable tool for improving the understanding of the complexities of climate-health research collaborations, and priority identification for improved
adaptation and service delivery.
CONCLUSION : Concerted recognition regarding difficulties in linking climate science and health vulnerability at
the interface of practitioners and decision-makers is required, for better integration and use of climate-health
research in climate adaptation in Africa. This can be achieved by innovations offered through Q-Storming.The World Health Organization, Clim-Health Africa, Natural Environment Research Council, the South African government via the South African Medical Research Council and an Oppenheimer Memorial Trust International Fellowship.http://www.elsevier.com/joclimam2024Geography, Geoinformatics and MeteorologySDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingSDG-13:Climate actio
Recommended from our members
Q-Storming’ to identify challenges and opportunities for integrating health and climate adaptation measures in Africa
Introduction
Climate factors influence the state of human health and wellbeing. Climate-related threats are particularly being experienced by vulnerable populations in Africa. A Question (Q)-Storming session was convened at an international climate adaptation conference. It promoted dialog among a diverse spectrum of researchers, climate and medical scientists, health professionals, national government officials, civil society, business, and international governing organizations. The session identified approaches for the effective integration of health within African national climate adaptation policies.
Materials and methods
Two organizations partnered to convene the session at the Adaptations Futures 2018 Conference in Cape Town. Q-storming (which is an inverse approach to brainstorming) was applied to extract ideas from all participants. Four topics were presented during the session: (i) adaptive capacities related to climate change and infectious diseases; (ii) adaptive capacity of African governments in relation to health and climate change; (iii) making climate science work to protect the health of vulnerable populations; and (iv) making climate-health research usable.
Results
Nine cross-cutting adaptation themes were generated (i.e. key definitions, adaptive capacity, health sector priorities, resources, operational capacities and procedures, contextual conditions, information pathways, and information utility). The Q-Storming approach was a valuable tool for improving the understanding of the complexities of climate-health research collaborations, and priority identification for improved adaptation and service delivery.
Conclusion
Concerted recognition regarding difficulties in linking climate science and health vulnerability at the interface of practitioners and decision-makers is required, for better integration and use of climate-health research in climate adaptation in Africa. This can be achieved by innovations offered through Q-Storming
Improvement of routine diagnosis of intestinal parasites with multiple sampling and SAF-fixative in the Triple-Faeces-Test
Background and study aim :To perform optimal laboratory diagnosis of intestinal parasites is demanding. Because intestinal parasites are intermittently shedded, examination of multiple stools is imperative. For reliable detection of vegetative stages of protozoa, fresh stools should be examined direct after production, or stools should be preserved in a fixative. These aspects in routine practice are often neglected with as a result lower sensitivity of the diagnostic procedure. With application of the Triple-Faeces-Test (TFT) protocol, where both multiple sampling and a SAF-fixative are included, these practical problems could be overcome. The aim of this study was to compare the recovery of intestinal parasites in faecal specimens using TFT protocol versus the conventional diagnostic method (ether-sedimentation of one fresh stool sample). Methods :During a three years period, results obtained in routine practice with the TFT protocol were compared with results from examination of sediment obtained with the ethyl-acetate-sedimentation technique of one unpreserved faeces specimen. Results :From 2,776 patients, 28.1% were positive for one or more intestinal parasites after examination of the TFT test, compared to 10.3% positivity with the conventional method (P < 0.05). Pathogenic species and non pathogenic species were observed respectively 191 and 449 times with TFT and 105 and 152 times with conventional method (P< 0.05). Conclusions :The application of the Triple-Faeces-Test in routine clinical practice significantly increased recovery of intestinal parasitic infections.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe