5 research outputs found

    Portable blood gas and electrolyte analyzer evaluated in a multiinstitutional study

    Get PDF
    A recently introduced blood gas/electrolyte analyzer (SenDx 100((R)), renamed ABL70) intended for point-of-care, near-patient, or stat laboratory use was evaluated simultaneously in four different institutions and compared with three different laboratory bench analyzers with respect to imprecision, inaccuracy (assessed by tonometry), and patient-sample analyses. The analyzer is equipped with a sensor cassette and a reagent cartridge for 50, 100, or 200 analyses and 100 or more traditional quality-control measurements. One analysis requires 170 microL of whole blood and takes <90 s. Statistically, the instrument performed somewhat better (lower CVs) for PO2 and potassium and somewhat worse for pH, PCO2, and ionized calcium than the respective comparison analyzers. However, the overall performance (in terms of CV and accuracy) was satisfactory in terms of clinical (e.g., CLIA '88) goals in all institutions. The mean difference and the CV of that difference in some 400 patient-sample comparisons were as follows: 0.010 (+/- 0.002%) for pH, -0.65 mmHg (+/- 4%) for PCO2, -0.49 mmHg (+/- 6%) for Po2, 0.44 mmol/L (+/- 1.2%) for sodium, -0.013 mmol/L (+/- 2.9%) for potassium, -0.016 mmol/L (+/- 2.6%) for ionized calcium, and -0.016 L/L (+/- 7. 1%) for the hematocrit. Its acceptable analytical performance and ease of operation make the SenDx 100 suitable for the analysis of blood gases and electrolytes

    Approved IFCC recommendation on reporting results for blood glucose

    No full text
    In current clinical practice, plasma and blood glucose are used interchangeably with a consequent risk of clinical misinterpretation. In human blood, glucose is distributed, like water, between erythrocytes and plasma. The molality of glucose (amount of glucose per unit water mass) is the same throughout the sample, but the concentration is higher in plasma, because the concentration of water and therefore glucose is higher in plasma than in erythrocytes. Different devices for the measurement of glucose may detect and report fundamentally different quantities. Different water concentrations in the calibrator, plasma, and erythrocyte fluid can explain some of the differences. Results for glucose measurements depend on the sample type and on whether the method requires sample dilution or uses biosensors in undiluted samples. If the results are mixed up or used indiscriminately, the differences may exceed the maximum allowable error for glucose determinations for diagnosing and monitoring diabetes mellitus, thus complicating patient treatment. The goal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Scientific Division, Working Group on Selective Electrodes and Point of Care Testing (IFCC-SD-WG-SEPOCT) is to reach a global consensus on reporting results. The document recommends reporting the concentration of glucose in plasma (in the unit mmol/L), irrespective of sample type or measurement technique. A constant factor of 1.11 is used to convert concentration in whole blood to the equivalent concentration in plasma. The conversion will provide harmonized results, facilitating the classification and care of patients and leading to fewer therapeutic misjudgments. © 2006 by Walter de Gruyter.</p

    Recommendation for measuring and reporting chloride by ISEs in undiluted serum, plasma or blood.

    No full text
    The proposed recommendation for measuring and reporting chloride in undiluted plasma or blood by ion-selective electrodes (ISEs) will provide results that are identical to chloride concentrations measured by coulometry for standardized normal plasma or blood samples. It is applicable to all current ISEs dedicated to chloride measurement in undiluted samples that meet the requirements. However, in samples with reduced water concentration, results by coulometry are lower than by ion-selective electrode due to volume displacement. The quantity measured by this standardized ISE procedure is called the ionized chloride concentration. It may be clinically more relevant than the chloride concentration as determined by coulometry, photometry or by ISE after dilution of the sample
    corecore