767 research outputs found
ΠΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΠΌΡΡΠΎΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
Π Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΡ Π·Π°Π³ΡΡΠ·Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π°. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ Π±ΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΌΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅ΡΡ, Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ Π±Π΅ΡΠΏΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π½Π°Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΡΡΡΡΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠΎΡΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΡΠΎΠΌΠ΅ ΡΠΎΠ³ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΡ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΡΡΡΠ°Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΈΡ
ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌ, ΠΊΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ, Π²ΡΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΡΠΎΡ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Ρ Π±ΡΡΡ Π°ΠΊΠΊΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ, ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π°ΠΏΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΡ Π½Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΊΡΡ ΠΎΡΠ±ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΡΠ³ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠ»ΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ»ΠΎΡΡ
Π°ΡΠΌΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΡΡ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡ Π²ΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠΌΡΠ΅ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡ, ΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΠΊΠ½ΡΡΡΡΡ Ρ Π΅ΡΠ΅ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΡΡΡΠΈΠΌΠΈΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΈΡ
ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΡΠΎΡ, Π° ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ. Π ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡΠ²Π°Π΅ΡΡΡ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΡ Π²Π½Π΅ΡΠ½Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈΡ
ΡΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ½Π° ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΡΡΡΡ Π΅ΡΠ΅ Π½Π°ΡΡΠ°Π΄ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ. ΠΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΌΡ ΡΠΆΠ΅ Π½Π° Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΡΠ°ΠΏΠ΅ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΉΠΌΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ±Π»Π΅ΠΌΠΎΠΉ, ΡΠΎ ΠΌΡΡΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΡΡ Π±ΡΠ΄ΡΡΠΈΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΡΡΠΉ ΠΈ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΌΠΎΡ.Im vorliegenden Artikel werden die Probleme der Weltraumverschmutzung dargestellt. Der Artikelbeschreibt, wie gefahrlich die Weltraummissionen sein konnen, dass sogar unbemannte Satelliten der standigenGefahr ausgesetzt werden. Genauso erfahren wir, was wir gegen diese Gefahren tun konnen, z.B. ausgedienteSatelliten vorsichtig zu entsorgen,indemman sie auf eine andere Umlaufbahn bringt oder in den festen Schichten derErde vergluhen lasst. Wenn man dies nicht macht, so konnen sie mit den funktionierenden Satellitenzusammensto?en und diese au?er Betrieb setzen, was zur einen Kettenreaktion fuhren kann. Zudem beschreibt derText, wie die Satelliten geschutzt werden z.B. mit Hilfe von Schottelementen und dass man die Probleme derEntsorgung schon in der Projektierung angehen muss. Wenn wir dieses Problem schon heute angehen, souberlassen wir unserer nachfolgenden Generation einen sauberen und sicheren Weltraum
Breaking Cosmological Degeneracies in Galaxy Cluster Surveys with a Physical Model of Cluster Structure
Forthcoming large galaxy cluster surveys will yield tight constraints on
cosmological models. It has been shown that in an idealized survey, containing
> 10,000 clusters, statistical errors on dark energy and other cosmological
parameters will be at the percent level. It has also been shown that through
"self-calibration", parameters describing the mass-observable relation and
cosmology can be simultaneously determined, though at a loss in accuracy by
about an order of magnitude. Here we examine the utility of an alternative
approach of self-calibration, in which a parametrized ab-initio physical model
is used to compute cluster structure and the resulting mass-observable
relations. As an example, we use a modified-entropy ("pre-heating") model of
the intracluster medium, with the history and magnitude of entropy injection as
unknown input parameters. Using a Fisher matrix approach, we evaluate the
expected simultaneous statistical errors on cosmological and cluster model
parameters. We study two types of surveys, in which a comparable number of
clusters are identified either through their X-ray emission or through their
integrated Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect. We find that compared to a
phenomenological parametrization of the mass-observable relation, using our
physical model yields significantly tighter constraints in both surveys, and
offers substantially improved synergy when the two surveys are combined. These
results suggest that parametrized physical models of cluster structure will be
useful when extracting cosmological constraints from SZ and X-ray cluster
surveys. (abridged)Comment: 22 pages, 8 figures, accepted to Ap
Physical approximations for the nonlinear evolution of perturbations in dark energy scenarios
The abundance and distribution of collapsed objects such as galaxy clusters
will become an important tool to investigate the nature of dark energy and dark
matter. Number counts of very massive objects are sensitive not only to the
equation of state of dark energy, which parametrizes the smooth component of
its pressure, but also to the sound speed of dark energy as well, which
determines the amount of pressure in inhomogeneous and collapsed structures.
Since the evolution of these structures must be followed well into the
nonlinear regime, and a fully relativistic framework for this regime does not
exist yet, we compare two approximate schemes: the widely used spherical
collapse model, and the pseudo-Newtonian approach. We show that both
approximation schemes convey identical equations for the density contrast, when
the pressure perturbation of dark energy is parametrized in terms of an
effective sound speed. We also make a comparison of these approximate
approaches to general relativity in the linearized regime, which lends some
support to the approximations.Comment: 15 pages, 2 figure
Redefining the Missing Satellites Problem
Numerical simulations of Milky-Way size Cold Dark Matter (CDM) halos predict
a steeply rising mass function of small dark matter subhalos and a substructure
count that greatly outnumbers the observed satellites of the Milky Way. Several
proposed explanations exist, but detailed comparison between theory and
observation in terms of the maximum circular velocity (Vmax) of the subhalos is
hampered by the fact that Vmax for satellite halos is poorly constrained. We
present comprehensive mass models for the well-known Milky Way dwarf
satellites, and derive likelihood functions to show that their masses within
0.6 kpc (M_0.6) are strongly constrained by the present data. We show that the
M_0.6 mass function of luminous satellite halos is flat between ~ 10^7 and 10^8
M_\odot. We use the ``Via Lactea'' N-body simulation to show that the M_0.6
mass function of CDM subhalos is steeply rising over this range. We rule out
the hypothesis that the 11 well-known satellites of the Milky Way are hosted by
the 11 most massive subhalos. We show that models where the brightest
satellites correspond to the earliest forming subhalos or the most massive
accreted objects both reproduce the observed mass function. A similar analysis
with the newly-discovered dwarf satellites will further test these scenarios
and provide powerful constraints on the CDM small-scale power spectrum and warm
dark matter models.Comment: 8 pages, 6 figure
ΠΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΡΠ½Π°Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡΠΈΠΎΠ½ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ WiFi
Substructure Boosts to Dark Matter Annihilation from Sommerfeld Enhancement
The recently introduced Sommerfeld enhancement of the dark matter
annihilation cross section has important implications for the detection of dark
matter annihilation in subhalos in the Galactic halo. In addition to the boost
to the dark matter annihilation cross section from the high densities of these
subhalos with respect to the main halo, an additional boost caused by the
Sommerfeld enhancement results from the fact that they are kinematically colder
than the Galactic halo. If we further believe the generic prediction of CDM
that in each subhalo there is an abundance of substructure which is
approximately self-similar to that of the Galactic halo, then I show that
additional boosts coming from the density enhancements of these small
substructures and their small velocity dispersions enhance the dark matter
annihilation cross section even further. I find that very large boost factors
( to ) are obtained in a large class of models. The implications of
these boost factors for the detection of dark matter annihilation from dwarf
Spheroidal galaxies in the Galactic halo are such that, generically, they
outshine the background gamma-ray flux and are detectable by the Fermi
Gamma-ray Space Telescope.Comment: PRD in pres
ΠΡΠΈΠ±ΠΎΡΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΡΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π±Π΅Π·ΠΎΠΏΠ°ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π²Π·ΡΡΠ²Π½ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ ΠΏΡΠΈ Π΄ΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΡΡ ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΏΠ°Π΅ΠΌΡΡ
- β¦