Thioguanine is Effective as Maintenance Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Prospective Multicentre Registry Study

Background and Aims: Thioguanine is a well-tolerated and effective therapy for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients. Prospective effectiveness data are needed to substantiate the role of thioguanine as a maintenance therapy for IBD. Methods: IBD patients who previously failed azathioprine or mercaptopurine and initiated thioguanine were prospectively followed for 12 months starting when corticosteroid-free clinical remission was achieved (Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI] ≤ 4 or Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index [SCCAI] ≤ 2). The primary endpoint was corticosteroid-free clinical remission throughout 12 months. Loss of clinical remission was defined as SCCAI > 2 or HBI > 4, need of surgery, escalation of therapy, initiation of corticosteroids or study discontinuation. Additional endpoints were adverse events, drug survival, physician global assessment [PGA] and quality of life [QoL]. Results: Sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission at 3, 6 or 12 months was observed in 75 [69%], 66 [61%] and 49 [45%] of 108 patients, respectively. Thioguanine was continued in 86 patients [80%] for at least 12 months. Loss of response [55%] included escalation to biologicals in 15%, corticosteroids in 10% and surgery in 3%. According to PGA scores, 82% of patients were still in remission after 12 months and QoL scores remained stable. Adverse events leading to discontinuation were reported in 11%, infections in 10%, myelo- and hepatotoxicity each in 6%, and portal hypertension in 1% of patients. Conclusion: Sustained corticosteroid-free clinical remission over 12 months was achieved in 45% of IBD patients on monotherapy with thioguanine. A drug continuation rate of 80%, together with favourable PGA and QoL scores, underlines the tolerability and effectiveness of thioguanine for IBD

Preoperative biliary drainage for periampullary tumors causing obstructive jaundice; DRainage vs. (direct) OPeration (DROP-trial)

BACKGROUND: Surgery in patients with obstructive jaundice caused by a periampullary (pancreas, papilla, distal bile duct) tumor is associated with a higher risk of postoperative complications than in non-jaundiced patients. Preoperative biliary drainage was introduced in an attempt to improve the general condition and thus reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality. Early studies showed a reduction in morbidity. However, more recently the focus has shifted towards the negative effects of drainage, such as an increase of infectious complications. Whether biliary drainage should always be performed in jaundiced patients remains controversial. The randomized controlled multicenter DROP-trial (DRainage vs. Operation) was conceived to compare the outcome of a 'preoperative biliary drainage strategy' (standard strategy) with that of an 'early-surgery' strategy, with respect to the incidence of severe complications (primary-outcome measure), hospital stay, number of invasive diagnostic tests, costs, and quality of life. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with obstructive jaundice due to a periampullary tumor, eligible for exploration after staging with CT scan, and scheduled to undergo a "curative" resection, will be randomized to either "early surgical treatment" (within one week) or "preoperative biliary drainage" (for 4 weeks) and subsequent surgical treatment (standard treatment). Primary outcome measure is the percentage of severe complications up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size calculation is based on the equivalence design for the primary outcome measure. If equivalence is found, the comparison of the secondary outcomes will be essential in selecting the preferred strategy. Based on a 40% complication rate for early surgical treatment and 48% for preoperative drainage, equivalence is taken to be demonstrated if the percentage of severe complications with early surgical treatment is not more than 10% higher compared to standard treatment: preoperative biliary drainage. Accounting for a 10% dropout, 105 patients are needed in each arm resulting in a study population of 210 (alpha = 0.95, beta = 0.8). DISCUSSION: The DROP-trial is a randomized controlled multicenter trial that will provide evidence whether or not preoperative biliary drainage is to be performed in patients with obstructive jaundice due to a periampullary tumor

Clinical evidence for a protective role of lipocalin-2 against MDAP-9 autodegradation and the impact for gastric cancer

Kubben FJGM, Sier CFM, Hawinkels LJAC, et al. Clinical evidence for a protective role of lipocalin-2 against MDAP-9 autodegradation and the impact for gastric cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER. 2007;43(12):1869-1876.Recently, complexes of matrix metalloproteinase matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) with lipocalin-2 (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) were found in the urine obtained from breast cancer patients, while these were completely absent in that obtained from healthy controls. In vitro data suggested a possible role for lipocalin-2 in the protection of MMP-9 against autolysis. To establish this effect in vivo, we determined the presence of MMP-9, lipocalin-2 and their complex in tumour tissue from 81 gastric cancer patients. The effect of the presence of the individual parameters, the complexes, and the inhibitors TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 on MMP-9 activity was evaluated with a bioactivity assay Immuno-histochemical (double) staining identified epithelial cells as the most likely cellular source. Finally, evaluation of all these parameters with clinicopathological scores revealed that tumour MMP-9/lipocalin-2 complexes were significantly related with the classifications of Lauren and WHO, and highly associated with worse survival in Cox's univariate (HR 2.087, P = 0.006) and multivariate analyses (HR 2.095, P = 0.025). (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved