12 research outputs found

    Risk of adverse infant outcomes for assisted vaginal deliveries compared with unassisted deliveries in 158,241 WA public and private patient birth admissions.

    No full text
    <p>X-axis represents odds ratios (middle black dots) and 95% confidence intervals (top and bottom black dots). Logistic regression models -adjusted for the same factors as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0061699#pone-0061699-t003" target="_blank">Table 3</a>- were run separately for private and public patients to calculate separate odds ratios (ORs) for the risk of adverse infant outcomes for assisted vaginal deliveries compared with unassisted deliveries.</p

    Risk of adverse maternal and infant outcomes after assisted vaginal delivery compared with unassisted vaginal for 158,241<sup>a</sup> WA vaginal births.

    No full text
    a<p>Restricted to vaginal, singleton, term births (37–41 completed weeks), where the infant was live born and without birth defects.</p>b<p>Adjusted for year of birth, maternal age, parity, patient status (not in stratified analysis), hospital type (private/public/tertiary), smoking during pregnancy, marital status, ethnicity (Caucasian/Indigenous/other), pre-existing medical conditions (asthma/hypertension/diabestes), SES quintiles, residential remoteness, gestation, infant weight, pregnancy complications, labour and delivery complications, analgesia during labour (none/gas or intramuscular/epidural/spinal), and whether the labour was induced.</p>c<p>Apgar score at 5 minutes = 0–6.</p>d<p>Endotracheal intubation or external cardiac massage.</p

    Estimated quarterly birth rates in WA during July 2001 to December 2008.

    No full text
    <p>Vertical lines represent the period of the baby bonus implementation (April 2004-March 2005) that was excluded from the analysis. Horizontal line represents the trend line of the pre-baby bonus period, which was projected until 2008 assuming that no policy implementation occurred.</p

    Average quarterly birth rates by maternal demographics before and after the baby bonus introduction as well as post-2004 assuming the policy did not occur.

    No full text
    a<p>per 1000 population.</p>b<p>between post-BB rates and expected rates post-2004 (assuming the policy did not occur).</p>c<p>SES: Socio-economic status. Sextiles 1–3.</p>d<p>SES: Socio-economic status. Sextiles 4–6.</p>e<p>Major cities and inner regional Australia.</p>f<p>Outer regional Australia, remote Australia, and very remote Australia.</p><p>BB = baby bonus.</p
    corecore