The need for multidisciplinarity in specialist training to optimize future patient care

Harmonious interactions between radiation, medical, interventional and surgical oncologists, as well as other members of multidisciplinary teams, are essential for the optimization of patient care in oncology. This multidisciplinary approach is particularly important in the current landscape, in which standard-of-care approaches to cancer treatment are evolving towards highly targeted treatments, precise image guidance and personalized cancer therapy. Herein, we highlight the importance of multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity at all levels of clinical oncology training. Potential deficits in the current career development pathways and suggested strategies to broaden clinical training and research are presented, with specific emphasis on the merits of trainee involvement in functional multidisciplinary teams. Finally, the importance of training in multidisciplinary research is discussed, with the expectation that this awareness will yield the most fertile ground for future discoveries. Our key message is for cancer professionals to fulfil their duty in ensuring that trainees appreciate the importance of multidisciplinary research and practice

Vascular Closure Devices: Technical Tips, Complications, and Management

© 2015. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used to obtain hemostasis at the vascular access site while limiting the need for manual compression. They have gained significant popularity since their introduction in the mid-1990s. In the past 20 years, there has been a multitude of different devices introduced with various mechanisms of action. Manual compression remains the gold standard but can be very time consuming and painful for the patient. VCDs are advantageous in that they can reduce time to hemostasis and patient recovery and improve patient comfort. However, a large number of catheter-based procedures are performed without these closure devices owing to lack of operator familiarity, risk of complications, and cost. Most VCDs are approved for arteriotomies between 5 and 8. F, with 1 device approved for up to 21. F. Major complications include infection and limb ischemia. This article provides an update on currently approved VCDs, a brief overview of the literature, and our institutional experience with these devices

Vascular Closure Devices: Technical Tips, Complications, and Management.

© 2015. Vascular closure devices (VCDs) are used to obtain hemostasis at the vascular access site while limiting the need for manual compression. They have gained significant popularity since their introduction in the mid-1990s. In the past 20 years, there has been a multitude of different devices introduced with various mechanisms of action. Manual compression remains the gold standard but can be very time consuming and painful for the patient. VCDs are advantageous in that they can reduce time to hemostasis and patient recovery and improve patient comfort. However, a large number of catheter-based procedures are performed without these closure devices owing to lack of operator familiarity, risk of complications, and cost. Most VCDs are approved for arteriotomies between 5 and 8. F, with 1 device approved for up to 21. F. Major complications include infection and limb ischemia. This article provides an update on currently approved VCDs, a brief overview of the literature, and our institutional experience with these devices

First Human Experience with Directly Image-able Iodinated Embolization Microbeads

© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Purpose: To describe first clinical experience with a directly image-able, inherently radio-opaque microspherical embolic agent for transarterial embolization of liver tumors. Methodology: LC Bead LUMI™ is a new product based upon sulfonate-modified polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel microbeads with covalently bound iodine (~260 mg I/ml). 70–150 μ LC Bead LUMI™ iodinated microbeads were injected selectively via a 2.8 Fr microcatheter to near complete flow stasis into hepatic arteries in three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, carcinoid, or neuroendocrine tumor. A custom imaging platform tuned for LC LUMI™ microbead conspicuity using a cone beam CT (CBCT)/angiographic C-arm system (Allura Clarity FD20, Philips) was used along with CBCT embolization treatment planning software (EmboGuide, Philips). Results: LC Bead LUMI™ image-able microbeads were easily delivered and monitored during the procedure using fluoroscopy, single-shot radiography (SSD), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), dual-phase enhanced and unenhanced CBCT, and unenhanced conventional CT obtained 48 h after the procedure. Intra-procedural imaging demonstrated tumor at risk for potential under-treatment, defined as paucity of image-able microbeads within a portion of the tumor which was confirmed at 48 h CT imaging. Fusion of pre- and post-embolization CBCT identified vessels without beads that corresponded to enhancing tumor tissue in the same location on follow-up imaging (48 h post). Conclusion: LC Bead LUMI™ image-able microbeads provide real-time feedback and geographic localization of treatment in real time during treatment. The distribution and density of image-able beads within a tumor need further evaluation as an additional endpoint for embolization

First Human Experience with Directly Image-able Iodinated Embolization Microbeads.

© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). Purpose: To describe first clinical experience with a directly image-able, inherently radio-opaque microspherical embolic agent for transarterial embolization of liver tumors. Methodology: LC Bead LUMI™ is a new product based upon sulfonate-modified polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel microbeads with covalently bound iodine (~260 mg I/ml). 70–150 μ LC Bead LUMI™ iodinated microbeads were injected selectively via a 2.8 Fr microcatheter to near complete flow stasis into hepatic arteries in three patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, carcinoid, or neuroendocrine tumor. A custom imaging platform tuned for LC LUMI™ microbead conspicuity using a cone beam CT (CBCT)/angiographic C-arm system (Allura Clarity FD20, Philips) was used along with CBCT embolization treatment planning software (EmboGuide, Philips). Results: LC Bead LUMI™ image-able microbeads were easily delivered and monitored during the procedure using fluoroscopy, single-shot radiography (SSD), digital subtraction angiography (DSA), dual-phase enhanced and unenhanced CBCT, and unenhanced conventional CT obtained 48 h after the procedure. Intra-procedural imaging demonstrated tumor at risk for potential under-treatment, defined as paucity of image-able microbeads within a portion of the tumor which was confirmed at 48 h CT imaging. Fusion of pre- and post-embolization CBCT identified vessels without beads that corresponded to enhancing tumor tissue in the same location on follow-up imaging (48 h post). Conclusion: LC Bead LUMI™ image-able microbeads provide real-time feedback and geographic localization of treatment in real time during treatment. The distribution and density of image-able beads within a tumor need further evaluation as an additional endpoint for embolization