Comparison of the efficacy of two differently dosed levothyroxine-iodide-combinations in the treatment of euthyroid diffuse goiter

Grundproblematik und Fragestellung: In der Behandlung der endemischen Struma läßt sich durch Levothyroxin und/oder Iodid eine Reduktion des Schilddrüsenvolumens erreichen. Eine unter Levothyroxintherapie auftretende TSH-Suppression kann sich jedoch über die Persistenz des intrathyreoidalen Iodmangels negativ auf die Rezidivhäufigkeit auswirken. In dieser Studie soll die Wirksamkeit zweier verschieden dosierter Kombinationspräparate aus Levothyroxin und Iodid verglichen werden, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Auswirkung des Levothyroxinanteils auf die intrathyreoidale Iodkonzentration. Patienten und Methodik: 44 Patientinnen mit euthyreoter diffuser Struma wurden in die Studie aufgenommen und randomisiert zwei Therapiegruppen zugeordnet. Gruppe A wurde mit 75 µg Levothyroxin und 150 µg Iodid (Verhältnis 1:2) behandelt. Gruppe B erhielt eine Kombination aus 100 µg Levothyroxin und 100 µg Iodid (Verhältnis 1:1) Die Therapie erstreckte sich über drei Monate mit anschließendem Beobachtungsintervall von drei Monaten ohne Medikation. Zu Studienbeginn, nach drei und sechs Monaten erfolgte eine Messung der intrathyreoidalen Iodkonzentration mittels Röntgenfluoreszenzanalyse, des sonografischen Schilddrüsenvolumens, der Iodausscheidung im Spontanurin und des basalen TSH, sowie der Schilddrüsenhormone und des Thyreoglobulins. Die Verträglichkeit der Präparate wurde ebenfalls erfaßt. Ergebnisse: Im Verlauf der Studie, sowohl unter Therapie, als auch während der Nachbeobachtungsphase kam es in beiden Gruppen (auswertbar in Gruppe B n = 20, in Gruppe A n = 21) nur zu geringen, nicht signifikanten Veränderungen des intrathyreoidalen Iodgehalts. Durch die Behandlung reduzierte sich das Schilddrüsenvolumen in Gruppe B um im Mittel 17,3% gegenüber dem Ausgangswert (p<0,001); in Gruppe A um 14,8% (p<0,001). Der erreichte Effekt blieb in Gruppe B über die Nachbeobachtungsperiode erhalten, in Gruppe A sank das mittlere Volumen um weitere vier Prozent (n.s.). Ein signifikanter Unterschied zwischen den Gruppen ließ sich für die intrathyreoidale Iodkonzentration, wie auch für das Schilddrüsenvolumen nicht nachweisen. In Gruppe B war eine statistisch signifikant stärkere TSH-Suppression (p=0,04) und ein höherer TSH-Anstieg (p=0,025) nach Therapie im Vergleich zu Gruppe A zu beobachten. Folgerung: Beide Kombinationspräparate bewirkten eine vergleichbare dauerhafte Volumenreduktion der Schilddrüse ohne relevante Veränderung der intrathyreoidalen Iodkonzentration. Aufgrund des geringeren posttherapeutischen TSH-Anstiegs scheint die 1:2 Kombination gegenüber der 1:1 Kombination geringe Vorteile zu bieten.Basic problem and objective: A reduction of thyroid volume may be achieved by treatment with levothyroxine and/or iodide. TSH-suppression which may be caused by levothyroxine monotherapy is considered to lead to persisting intrathyroidal iodine deficiency and frequent relapses. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two differently dosed preparations containing both levothyroxine and iodide especially considering the influence of the levothyroxine on intrathyroidal iodine concentration. Patients and methods: 44 female patients with euthyroid diffuse goiters were included into the study and randomly assigned to two groups. Group A was treated with 75 µg of levothyroxine and 150 µg of iodide (relation 1:2). Group B received a combination of 100 µg of levothyroxine and 100 µg of iodide (relation 1:1).Therapy was carried out for three months with a follow up period without any medication of another three months. Patients were examined before entering the study, after three months of treatment and after six months following the wash out period. The examination consisted of a measurement of thyroidal iodine concentration by X-ray fluorescence analysis, thyroidal volume by ultrasound, iodine excretion and TSH. Thyroidal hormones, thyroglobulin and side effects were also monitored. Results: Throughout the study only small non significant changes of intrathyroidal iodine concentration and no group differences were observed. In group A (21 patients) only 14.8% (p<0.001) was reached, in group B (20 patients) treatment lead to a mean reduction of thyroidal volume of 17.3% (p<0.001). During the follow up period thyroids in group B kept their size whereas the mean volume decreased 4 percent (n.s) in group A. This difference was not significant. Group B showed a statistically relevant stronger TSH suppression (p=0.04) and a more pronounced rise of TSH after therapy (p=0.025) than A. Conclusion: Both preparations were equally efficacious in terms of thyroid volume reduction without reducing thyroidal iodine concentration. Being both effective in the treatment of endemic goiter the 2:1 combination seems to be slightly more favorable because of the lower posttherapeutic rise of TSH

Dynamic problems and nature inspired meta-heuristics

Biological systems have often been used as the inspiration for search techniques to solve continuous and discrete combinatorial optimisation problems. One of the key aspects of biological systems is their ability to adapt to changing environmental conditions. Yet, biologically inspired optimisation techniques are mostly used to solve static problems (problems that do not change while they are being solved) rather than their dynamic counterparts. This is mainly due to the fact that the incorporation of temporal search control is a challenging task. Recently, however, a greater body of work has been completed on enhanced versions of these biologically inspired meta-heuristics, particularly genetic algorithms, ant colony optimisation, particle swarm optimisation and extremal optimisation, so as to allow them to solve dynamic optimisation problems. This survey chapter examines representative works and methodologies of these techniques on this important class of problems

Aufschwung durch die Energiewende. Konzeptstudie der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiewende Nordostbayern

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Energiewende Nordostbayer

Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) - Part 2 with Recommendations on Psycho-oncology, Rehabilitation, Follow-up, Recurrence, Palliative Therapy and Healthcare Facilities.

Aim This is an update of the interdisciplinary S3-guideline on the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer (AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL), published in March 2021. The work on the updated guideline was funded by German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) as part of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. The guideline was coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics ( Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe , DGGG) and the Working Group on Gynecological Oncology ( Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie , AGO) of the German Cancer Society ( Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft , DKG). Method The process used to update the 2014 S3-guideline was based on an appraisal of the available evidence using the criteria of evidence-based medicine, adaptations of existing evidence-based national and international guidelines or - if evidence was lacking - on the consensus of the specialists involved in compiling the update. After an initial review of the current literature was carried out according to a prescribed algorithm, several areas were identified which, in contrast to the predecessor version from September 2014, required new recommendations or statements which would take account of more recently published literature and the recent appraisal of new evidence. Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on palliative therapy and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer. The most important aspects included in this updated guideline are the new FIGO classification published in 2018, the radical open surgery approach used to treat cervical cancer up to FIGO stage IB1, and the use of the sentinel lymph node technique for tumors ≤ 2 cm. Other changes include the use of PET-CT, new options in radiotherapy (e.g., intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided adaptive brachytherapy), and drug therapies to treat recurrence or metastasis

Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL, May 2021) - Part 1 with Recommendations on Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnostics and Therapy.

Aim This update of the interdisciplinary S3 guideline on the Diagnosis, Therapy and Follow-up of Cervical Cancer (AWMF Registry No. 032/033OL) was published in March 2021. This updated guideline was funded by German Cancer Aid (Deutsche Krebshilfe) as part of the German Guideline Program in Oncology. The guideline was coordinated by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics ( Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe , DGGG) and the Working Group on Gynecological Oncology ( Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie , AGO) of the German Cancer Society ( Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft , DKG). Method The process of updating the S3 guideline dating from 2014 was based on an appraisal of the available evidence using the criteria of evidence-based medicine, adaptations of existing evidence-based national and international guidelines or - if evidence was lacking - on a consensus of the specialists involved in compiling the update. After an initial review of the current literature was carried out according to a prescribed algorithm, several areas were identified which, in contrast to the predecessor version from September 2014, required new recommendations or statements which took account of more recently published literature and the appraisal of the new evidence. Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on the epidemiology, screening, diagnostic workup and therapy of patients with cervical cancer. The most important new aspects included in this updated guideline include the newly published FIGO classification of 2018, the radical open surgery approach for cervical cancers up to FIGO stage IB1, and use of the sentinel lymph node technique for tumors ≤ 2 cm. Other changes include the use of PET-CT, new options in radiotherapy (e.g., intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided adaptive brachytherapy), and drug therapies to treat recurrence or metastasis

Endometrial Cancer. Guideline of the DGGG, DKG and DKH (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/034-OL, September 2022). Part 1 with Recommendations on the Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis and Hereditary Factors of Endometrial Cancer, Geriatric Assessment and Supply Structures.

Summary The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer, first published in April 2018, was reviewed in its entirety between April 2020 and January 2022 and updated. The review was carried out at the request of German Cancer Aid as part of the Oncology Guidelines Program and the lead coordinators were the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Gynecology Oncology Working Group (AGO) of the German Cancer Society (DKG) and the German Cancer Aid (DKH). The guideline update was based on a systematic search and assessment of the literature published between 2016 and 2020. All statements, recommendations and background texts were reviewed and either confirmed or amended. New statements and recommendations were included where necessary. Aim The use of evidence-based risk-adapted therapies to treat women with endometrial cancer of low risk prevents unnecessarily radical surgery and avoids non-beneficial adjuvant radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy. For women with endometrial cancer and a high risk of recurrence, the guideline defines the optimum level of radical surgery and indicates whether chemotherapy and/or adjuvant radiation therapy is necessary. This should improve the survival rates and quality of life of these patients. The S3-guideline on endometrial cancer and the quality indicators based on the guideline aim to provide the basis for the work of certified gynecological cancer centers. Methods The guideline was first compiled in 2018 in accordance with the requirements for S3-level guidelines and was updated in 2022. The update included an adaptation of the source guidelines identified using the German Instrument for Methodological Guideline Appraisal (DELBI). The update also used evidence reviews which were created based on selected literature obtained from systematic searches in selected literature databases using the PICO process. The Clinical Guidelines Service Group was tasked with carrying out a systematic search and assessment of the literature. Their results were used by interdisciplinary working groups as a basis for developing suggestions for recommendations and statements which were then modified during structured online consensus conferences and/or additionally amended online using the DELPHI process to achieve a consensus. Recommendations Part 1 of this short version of the guideline provides recommendations on epidemiology, screening, diagnosis, and hereditary factors. The epidemiology of endometrial cancer and the risk factors for developing endometrial cancer are presented. The options for screening and the methods used to diagnose endometrial cancer are outlined. Recommendations are given for the prevention, diagnosis, and therapy of hereditary forms of endometrial cancer. The use of geriatric assessment is considered and existing structures of care are presented