Performance of stair negotiation in patients with cerebral palsy and stiff knee gait

Background Due to the limited knee range of motion, achieving adequate foot clearance while walking on level ground constitutes a major problem for patients with cerebral palsy and stiff knee gait. Stair negotiation as an activity of daily life requires a considerably higher knee range of motion than level ground walking, but little is known yet as to whether such patients are able to walk stairs. Research question: The aim of this study was to investigate how patients with a limited knee range of motion negotiate stairs. Do they increase their peak knee flexion and use the same pattern as in walking on level ground? How do the muscles act during stair negotiation? Methods In this explorative study, 17 adults with bilateral, spastic cerebral palsy and stiff knee gait and 25 healthy subjects were examined. 3D motion analysis, including electromyography, was performed while walking on level ground, upstairs, and downstairs. A linear mixed model was used for between- and within-group comparisons. Results Walking upstairs and downstairs, patients increased their peak knee flexion by around 30° compared to level walking. Thus, increased knee flexion may be seen as the main mechanism for maintaining foot clearance on stairs. An increased pelvic obliquity (elevation) and hip flexion were also found and involved subjects showed a slight increase in rectus femoris activity when walking on stairs compared to level walking within the phases of high knee flexion. Significance This study showed that patients with cerebral palsy and stiff knee gait are able to flex their knees more than would be required for level walking. Hence, the patients are able to adapt their rectus activity to stair walking to some extent. Therefore, further investigations might help to open up new therapeutic options to facilitate level walking and stair negotiation in patients with stiff knee gait

Rasterstereographic Analysis of Lateral Shift in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Case Control Study

Objective. Detection of a lateral shift (LS) in patients with diagnosed disc herniation compared to healthy controls. Summary of Background Data. A specific lateral shift (LS) pattern is observed in patients with disc herniation and low back pain, as shown in earlier studies. Methods. Rasterstereography (RS) was used to investigate the LS. Thirty-nine patients with lumbar disc herniation diagnosed by radiological assessment and low back pain and/or leg pain (mean age 48.2 years, mean BMI 28.5, 28 males and 11 females) and 36 healthy controls (mean age 47.4 years, mean BMI 25.7, 25 males and 11 females) were analysed. LS, pelvic tilt, pelvic inclination, lordotic angle, and trunk torsion were assessed. Results. The patient group showed a nonsignificant increase in LS, that is, 5.6 mm compared to the healthy controls with 5.0 mm (p = 0.693). However, significant differences were found between groups regarding pelvic tilt in degrees (patients 5.9°, healthy controls 2.0°; p = 0.016), trunk torsion (patients 7.5°, controls 4.5°; p = 0.017), and lordotic angle (patients 27.5°, healthy controls 32.7°; p = 0.022). The correlation between pain intensity and the FFbH-R amounted 0.804 (p = < 0.01), and that between pain intensity and the pain disability index was 0.785 (p < 0.01). Discussion. Although some studies have illustrated LS with disc herniation and low back pain, the present findings demonstrate no significant increase in LS in the patient group compared to healthy controls. Conclusion. The patients with lumbar disc herniation did not demonstrate an increased LS compared to healthy controls. Other parameters like pelvic tilt and inclination seemed to be more suitable to identify changes in posture measured by RS in patients with low back pain or disc herniation

Effects of artificially induced bilateral internal rotation gait on gait kinematics and kinetics

BACKGROUND Bilateral internal rotation gait is a common gait abnormality in children with bilateral cerebral palsy, but still not fully understood. RESEARCH QUESTION The aim of this clinical study was to analyze the effects of artificially induced bilateral internal rotation gait on kinematics and kinetics. Our hypothesis was, that the internal rotation gait defined as increased dynamic internal hip rotation itself causes significant alterations in gait kinematics and kinetics. METHODS 30 typically developing children with a mean age of 12 (SD 3) years (range 8 - 16) performed three-dimensional gait analysis in two different conditions: with unaffected gait and with artificially induced bilateral internal rotation gait with two rotation bandages worn in order to internally rotate the hips. Kinematic and kinetic changes between these two conditions were calculated and compared using a mixed linear model with "gait condition" as fixed effect and both "limb" and "patient" as random effects. RESULTS The rotation bandages induced a significant increase in internal hip rotation and foot progression angle towards internal without affecting pelvic rotation. The peak hip internal rotator moment during loading response and the peak hip external rotator moment during the first half of stance phase increased significantly and the peak hip internal rotator moment during the second half of stance phase decreased significantly. Anterior pelvic tilt, hip flexion, knee flexion and ankle dorsiflexion increased significantly. The first peak of the frontal hip moment decreased, and the second increased significantly. The second peak of the frontal knee moment decreased significantly, while the first didn't change significantly. SIGNIFICANCE The data suggest, that the bilaterally increased dynamic internal hip rotation itself has a relevant impact on frontal hip moments. The increased anterior pelvic tilt, hip and knee flexion may be either induced by the pull of the rotation bandage or a secondary gait deviation

European consensus on the concepts and measurement of the pathophysiological neuromuscular responses to passive muscle stretch

Background and purpose To support clinical decision-making in central neurological disorders, a physical examination is used to assess responses to passive muscle stretch. However, what exactly is being assessed is expressed and interpreted in different ways. A clear diagnostic framework is lacking. Therefore, the aim was to arrive at unambiguous terminology about the concepts and measurement around pathophysiological neuromuscular response to passive muscle stretch. Methods During two consensus meetings, 37 experts from 12 European countries filled online questionnaires based on a Delphi approach, followed by plenary discussion after rounds. Consensus was reached for agreement ≥75%. Results The term hyper-resistance should be used to describe the phenomenon of impaired neuromuscular response during passive stretch, instead of for example ‘spasticity’ or ‘hypertonia’. From there, it is essential to distinguish non-neural (tissue-related) from neural (central nervous system related) contributions to hyper-resistance. Tissue contributions are elasticity, viscosity and muscle shortening. Neural contributions are velocity dependent stretch hyperreflexia and non-velocity dependent involuntary background activation. The term ‘spasticity’ should only be used next to stretch hyperreflexia, and ‘stiffness’ next to passive tissue contributions. When joint angle, moment and electromyography are recorded, components of hyper-resistance within the framework can be quantitatively assessed. Conclusions A conceptual framework of pathophysiological responses to passive muscle stretch is defined. This framework can be used in clinical assessment of hyper-resistance and will improve communication between clinicians. Components within the framework are defined by objective parameters from instrumented assessment. These parameters need experimental validation in order to develop treatment algorithms based on the aetiology of the clinical phenomena