Endoaortic clamping does not increase the risk of stroke in minimal access mitral valve surgery. a multicenter experience

BACKGROUND: Some controversy exists regarding the safety of endoaortic balloon clamping in minimal access isolated mitral valve surgery (MIMVS). The aim of this European multicenter study was to analyze the results in 10 experienced centers and compare the outcomes with published data. METHODS: The most recent 50 consecutive MIMVS cases from 10 European surgeons who had performed at least 100 procedures were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. All procedures were performed through right minithoracotomy with femoral cannulation and endoaortic balloon occlusion. In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were studied. Mortality and stroke rates were compared with published median sternotomy and MIMVS outcomes. RESULTS: Mean age was 63.2 ± 12.5 years, 289 (57.8%) were male, mean logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation was 6.1 ± 6.2, and 53 (10.6%) procedures had cardiac reoperations. Concomitant procedures were performed in 126 (25.9%) cases. Three patients (0.6%) required conversion to full sternotomy. Ten patients (2.0%) necessitated endoaortic balloon clamping conversion (8 to external clamping), and re-exploration for bleeding was necessary in 24 (4.8%) cases. Mean aortic cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass times were 85.6 ± 30.1 and 129.5 ± 40.2 min, respectively, and were significantly longer for concomitant procedures (p < 0.001). There were no aortic dissections and no deep venous thromboses. Operative mortality (none neurologic) and major stroke occurred in 7 (1.4%) and 4 (0.8%) patients, respectively. These rates compared favorably with the published literature on isolated primary mitral valve surgery (MVS) through sternotomy or minithoracotomy (mortality rates 0.2% to 11.6%, stroke rates 0.6% to 4.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Once procedural proficiency is acquired, endoaortic balloon clamping in MIMVS is a safe and effective technique. Despite the fact that this patient cohort also includes combined and redo procedures, the observed mortality and stroke rate compared favorably with the existing literature on primary isolated mitral valve surgery irrespective of the approach

Cross-sectional survey on minimally invasive mitral valve surgery

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) has become a standard technique to perform mitral valve surgery in many cardiac centers. However, there remains a question regarding when MIMVS should not be performed due to an increased surgical risk. Consequently, expert surgeons were surveyed regarding their opinions on patient factors, mitral valve pathology and surgical skills in MIMVS. Surgeons experienced in MIMVS were identified through an electronic search of the literature. A link to an online survey platform was sent to all surgeons, as well as two follow-up reminders. Survey responses were then submitted to a central database and analyzed. The survey was completed by 20 surgeons. Overall results were not uniform with regard to contraindications to performing MIMVS. Some respondents do not consider left atrial enlargement (95% of surgeons), complexity of surgery (75%), age (70%), aortic calcification (70%), EuroSCORE (60%), left ventricular ejection fraction (55%), or obesity (50%) to be contraindication to surgery. Ninety percent of respondents believe more than 20 cases are required to gain familiarity with the procedure, while 85% believe at least one MIMVS case needs to be performed per week to maintain proficiency. Eighty percent recommend establishment of multi-institutional databases and standardized surgical mentoring courses, while 75% believe MIMVS should be incorporated into current training programs for trainees. These results suggest that MIMVS has been accepted as a treatment option for patients with mitral valve pathologies according the expert panel. Initial training and continuing practice is recommended to maintain proficiency, as well as further research and formalization of training programs.6 page(s