25 research outputs found
Cracking down on bribery
Do crackdowns on bribery impact corrupt behavior in the long run? In this paper we observe the long-run impact of a short-term punishment institution (i.e., a crackdown) on bribery behavior in a lab setting. We conduct lab experiments in two countries with cultures that differ in corruption norms, and which experience very different levels of bribery: the US and Pakistan. Bribery is implemented in the laboratory as a repeated three-player sequential game, consisting of a firm, a government official and a citizen. The design contains three phases: pre-crackdown, crackdown, and post-crackdown. Results show that post-crackdown behavior is not significantly different from pre-crackdown behavior in either country. We conclude that short-term crackdowns may impact behavior in the short run, depending on the strength of the existing corruption norms in the country. More importantly, in our setting crackdowns are completely ineffective in the long run, as corrupt behavior rebounds to pre-crackdown levels
Fighting Corruption When Existing Corruption-Control Levels Count: What Do Wealth-Effects Tell Us in Africa?
The Political Economy of Covert Conflict and its Implications on Developing Democratic Systems of Governance in Africa
Reassessing private military and security company (PMSC) âcompetitionâ in civil war: lessons from Sierra Leone
Getting the basic nature of systemic corruption right : A reply to Marquette and Peiffer
In reply to Marquette and Peiffer's article âGrappling With the âReal Politicsâ of Systemic Corruption: Theoretical Debates Versus âReal-Worldâ Functions,â this article employs three criticisms: Marquette and Peiffer's call to grapple with the âreal politics of corruptionâ does not bring much new to the table, is conceptually flawed, and risks serving as an excuse for corrupt elites to pursue âbusiness as usual.â In response, we reaffirm three insights gained from collective action-based approaches toward corruption. Although corruption might solve individual-level problems in the short term, it is still a de facto problem at the aggregate level, the tools derived from principalâagent theory will not solve the collective action problem of systemic corruption, and elites will be the least likely to implement reform. We conclude by calling for the continued fight against corruptionâa fight informed by empirical and theoretical knowledge