Modulation of synaptic transmission by nociceptin/orphanin FQ and nocistatin in the spinal cord dorsal horn of mutant mice lacking the nociceptin/orphanin FQ receptor

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and nocistatin (NST) are two neuropeptides derived from the same precursor protein that exhibit opposing effects on spinal neurotransmission and nociception. Here, we have used whole-cell, patch-clamp recordings from visually identified neurons in spinal cord dorsal horn slices of genetically modified mice to investigate the role of the N/OFQ receptor (N/OFQ-R) in the modulatory action of both peptides on excitatory glutamatergic and inhibitory glycinergic and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-ergic synaptic transmission. In wild-type mice, N/OFQ selectively suppressed excitatory transmission in a concentration-dependent manner but left inhibitory synaptic transmission unaffected. In contrast, NST reduced only inhibitory but not alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor-mediated excitatory synaptic transmission. N/OFQ-mediated inhibition of excitatory transmission was completely absent in N/OFQ-R receptor-deficient (N/OFQ-R(-/-)) mice and significantly reduced in heterozygous (N/OFQ-R(+/-)) mice, whereas the action of NST on inhibitory neurotransmission was completely retained. To test for the relevance of these results for spinal nociception, we investigated the effects of intrathecally injected N/OFQ in the mouse formalin test, an animal model of tonic pain. N/OFQ (3 nmol/mouse) induced significant antinociception in wild-type mice, but had no antinociceptive effects in N/OFQ-R(-/-) mice. These results indicate that the inhibitory action of N/OFQ on excitatory glutamatergic synaptic transmission and its spinal antinociceptive action are mediated via the N/OFQ receptor, whereas the action of NST is independent of this receptor

A role for endocannabinoids in indomethacin-induced spinal antinociception

dInhibition of prostaglandins synthesis does not completely explain non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced spinal antinociception. Among other mediators, endocannabinoids are involved in pain modulation. Indomethacin-induced antinociception, in the formalin test performed in spinally microdialysed mice, was reversed by co-administration of the cannabinoid 1 (CB1) antagonist, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1-H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM-251), but not by co-infusion of prostaglandin E-2. Indomethacin was ineffective in CB1 knockout mice. AM-251 also reversed the indomethacin-induced antinociception in a test of inflammatory hyperalgesia to heat. Furthermore, during the formalin test, indomethacin lowered the levels of spinal nitric oxide (NO), which activates cellular reuptake and thus breakdown of endocannabinoids. The pronociceptive effect of an NO donor, 3-methyl-N-nitrososydnone-5-imine (RE-2047), was abolished by co-administration of the endocannabinoid transporter blocker N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) arachidonoyl amide (AM-404). Moreover, the antinociceptive activity of the NO synthase inhibitor, N-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), was reversed by AM-251. Thus we propose that at the spinal level, indomethacin induces a shift of arachidonic acid metabolism towards endocannabinoids synthesis secondary to cyclooxygenase inhibition. In addition, it lowers NO levels with subsequent higher levels of endocannabinoids. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved