27 research outputs found

    PHQ 9 Utilization in Maine Health

    Get PDF
    The PHQ is a brief patient survey for diagnosing depression and monitoring response to treatment.https://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/lambrew-retreat-2021/1039/thumbnail.jp

    Should we treat elevated cholesterol in elderly patients?

    Get PDF
    HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, or statins, have been shown to decrease all-cause mortality in individuals aged 65 and older with known coronary heart disease (CHD) and elevated cholesterol levels. (Grade of recommendation: A, based on randomized controlled trials.) The clinical benefit of statin use in older persons without known CHD, however, is uncertain. Decisions about testing for lipid levels and treatment should include discussions with the patient about the potential benefits and risks of treatment, taking into account the individual's overall risk of CHD. (Grade of recommendation: C, based on extrapolations from cohort studies.

    A New Project ECHO focused on Clinical Research in development by the NNE-CTR

    Get PDF
    I diagram presented for the project by the NNE-CTRhttps://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/lambrew-retreat-2021/1034/thumbnail.jp

    Boot Camp Translation: Community Engaged Research Process Evaluation

    Get PDF
    The BCT process was first developed by the High Plains Research Network and its Community Advisory Council in rural Colorado. Between 2004 and 2015 the BCT process was used 31 times across the U.S. on a broad range of topics.https://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/lambrew-retreat-2021/1003/thumbnail.jp

    Patient and Provider Experience with Artificial Intelligence Screening Technology for Diabetic Retinopathy in a Rural Primary Care Setting

    Get PDF
    Introduction: The development of autonomous artificial intelligence for interpreting diabetic retinopathy (DR) images has allowed for point-of-care testing in the primary care setting. This study describes patient and provider experiences and perceptions of the artificial intelligence DR screening technology called EyeArt by EyeNuk during implementation of the tool at Western Maine Primary Care in Norway, Maine. Methods: This non-randomized, single-center, prospective observational study surveyed 102 patients and 13 primary care providers on their experience of the new screening intervention. Results: All surveyed providers agreed that the new screening tool would improve access and annual screening rates. Some providers also identified initial challenges in incorporating the tool into the primary care visit (31%). Patients expressed a favorable view of the service, sharing an openness to being screened more regularly (75%) and a desire to have screenings performed at Western Maine Primary Care going forward (81%). Discussion: Patients were generally favorable about their experience with the new DR screening technology. Providers indicated challenges due to the limited availability of trained medical assistant photographers during the initial implementation of DR screening, as well as timing issues in coordinating screening with regular office appointments. Conclusions: This study supports further investigation of this technology in primary care, particularly in areas with challenges to care access. The potential benefits of this innovative tool in caring for people with diabetes includes improving access to retinopathy screenings and supporting wider detection of vision-threatening retinopathy

    The NCI/NIH Cancer Moonshot BioBank (CMB) and the Maine Cancer Genetics/Genomics Education Core (ME-CGEC) Collaborate to Improve Cancer Care in Maine

    Get PDF
    Goal: To better understand drug resistance and sensitivity in patients with late stage (Stage III & IV) cancers that are receiving standard of care molecularly targeted therapies through next generation sequencing (NGS) of biopsy and blood samples collected longitudinally (diagnosis-- treatment--progression).https://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/lambrew-retreat-2021/1053/thumbnail.jp

    The Maine Lung Cancer Coalition: A Statewide, Multi-Sector Partnership to Improve Evidence-Based Lung Cancer Prevention & Screening

    Get PDF
    MLCC has two primary goals: 1. Engage and educate about evidence based lung cancer prevention and screening practices 2. Develop, implement, and evaluate innovative programs to increase access to prevention, screening, and treatment services for all Mainershttps://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/lambrew-retreat-2021/1051/thumbnail.jp

    Centering Community Voices in our Research

    Get PDF
    What is Community Engaged Research? Community engaged research (CER) is the process of working collaboratively with groups of people affiliated by geographic proximity, special interests, or similar situations across the lifecycle of research.https://knowledgeconnection.mainehealth.org/lambrew-retreat-2022/1040/thumbnail.jp

    Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Making Processes

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Although shared decision making is recommended for cancer screening, it is not routinely completed in practice because of time constraints. We evaluated a process for improving decision making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening using mailed decision aids (DA) with follow-up telephone support in primary care practices. Methods: We identified patients aged 50-75 who were not up to date with CRC screening in three primary care practices. DA were distributed via mail with telephone follow-up to eligible patients, and charts were reviewed six months later for CRC screening completion. Results: Among 1,064 eligible patients who received the mailed DA, 513 (48.2%) were reached by phone. During the six months after the intervention, 148/1064 (13.9%) patients were screened for CRC (4.8% underwent FIT, 9.1% underwent colonoscopy). Younger patients (aged 50-54) had higher rates of any screening (32.4%) compared with all other age groups (range 12.8%-19.6%), p=0.026, while Medicaid patients had the lowest rates of screening (4.0%), and insured patients had the highest rates (45.3%), p=0.003. Overall, 113/513 (22.0%) who were reached by phone went on to complete screening within 6 months, compared with 35/551 (6.4%) of patients who were not reached by phone (p Conclusion: A standard process for identifying patients unscreened for CRC and DA distribution via mail with telephone decision support modestly increased CRC screening and is consistent with the goal of providing preference-sensitive care and informed decision making. Improving care processes to include decision support outside of office visits is possible in primary care practices
    corecore