24 research outputs found

    The Craniocervical Junction in Skeletal Dysplasia: MRI in Flexion and Extension

    No full text

    Orthopaedic manifestations of pseudoachondroplasia

    No full text

    Editorial

    No full text

    Thoracolumbar spinal deformity in achondroplasia

    No full text

    Expert’s comment concerning Grand Rounds case entitled “Surgical treatment of a 180° thoracolumbar fixed kyphosis in a young achondroplastic patient: a one stage ‘in situ’ combined fusion and spinal cord translocation” (by J. C. Aurégan, T. Odent, M. Zerah, J.-P. Padovani and C. Glorion)

    No full text
    An expert comment is provided for the case of an 18-year-old male achondroplastic patient with a severe thoracolumbar kyphosis and spinal stenosis managed with a five level hemilaminotomy, a decancellation osteotomy of the three apical vertebrae and circumferential fusion. A review incidence, presenting symptoms and treatment options for thoracolumbar kyphosis in adults with achondroplasia, is provided

    Development of a Scoring System to Evaluate the Severity of Craniocervical Spinal Cord Compression in Patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA (Morquio A Syndrome)

    No full text
    Background: As spinal cord compression at the craniocervical junction (CCJ) is a life-threatening manifestation in patients with mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) IVA, surgical decompression should be performed before damage becomes irreversible. We evaluated the diagnostic value of several examinations for determining the need for decompression surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analysed results of clinical neurological examination, somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 28 MPS IVA patients. A scoring system – based on the severity of findings – was used to compare results of patients with and without indication for decompression surgery. Individual test scores and two composite scores were evaluated for their potential to assess severity of CCJ impairment. Results: Sixteen patients had an indication for surgery; 12 of them had undergone surgery. Twelve patients had no indication for surgery; none had received surgery. Neurological (P = 0.004), MRI (P < 0.001) and atlantoaxial subluxation (P = 0.006) scores, but not SEP and odontoid hypoplasia scores, differed significantly between patients with and without surgical indication. Both the abbreviated CCJ score, i.e. sum of neurological and MRI scores, and the extended CCJ score, i.e. sum of abbreviated CCJ and atlantoaxial subluxation score, discriminated between patients with and without surgical indication (abbreviated: 0–2 points vs 2–5 points, P < 0.001; extended: 0–3 points vs 3–7 points; P < 0.001). Although CCJ instability plays a major role in cervical cord pathology, decompression surgery without occipito-cervical stabilisation may yield good postoperative results. Conclusions: The abbreviated and extended CCJ scores are objective, transparent and reproducible tools for assessing the CCJ pathology and the need for surgery
    corecore