449 research outputs found

    Late Quaternary paleoenvironmental reconstruction and paleoclimatic implications of the Aegean Sea (eastern Mediterranean) based on paleoceanographic indexes and stable isotopes

    Get PDF
    The Late Quaternary palaeoenvironmental evolution and the main palaeoceanographic changes of the Aegean Sea was reconstructed using planktonic foraminifera obtained from the sediments of a northern (SK-1) and a southern (NS-14) core site. Multivariate statistical approach, including Q-mode cluster and Principal Component (PCA) Analyses, gives an insight into the relationships between sea surface environmental changes between the north and south Aegean, and furthermore serves as a baseline data set for palaeoclimatic and palaeoceanographic reconstructions of the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Stable isotope analyses coupled with additional paleoceanographic (sea surface temperature (SST), productivity (SSP), stratification (S-index), upwelling (U-index), seasonality (Sn-index)) proxies provide insights into the sedimentological, hydrographic and trophic evolution and ecosystem dynamics of the Aegean Sea, and furthermore serve as a baseline data set for palaeoclimatic and palaeoceanographic reconstructions of the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Concentrating on the last ~19 ka, faunal and isotopic data concur, suggesting a series of climatic zones, corresponding to well-known climatic phases of the last glacial cycle. Cold and arid conditions during the late glacial period were followed by a warmer and wetter climate trend during deglacial time. A marked seasonality, characterized by homogenous water column favored by efficient upwelling during the winter and by warm stratified water column during the summer, has also been recognized during this period (BøllingeAllerød e BeA) in both basins. An abrupt switch to cool, arid climatic event (Younger Dryas e YD) suggests a strengthening of winter convection around 12.9 ka, which seems to be more evident in the north Aegean core. However, the more pronounced environmental changes between the north and south Aegean Sea were identified during the Holocene, and they coincide with the deposition of sapropel S1 and Sapropel-Mid-Holocene (SMH). The comparison between SK-1 and NS-14 records indicated significant changes in both the productivity and stratification patterns, with the former the main factor in north Aegean and the latter in south Aegean for S1 deposition. Regarding the localized deposition of SMH in the semi-enclosed shallow south Aegean site, the fully oxygenated and less productive water column conditions prevailing during that time (5.4 e4.3 ka) in the north Aegean were the limiting factor for its deposition

    Diagnostic Value of Assessment Tools for Sciatica in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Sciatica is one of the most common reasons for seeking healthcare for musculoskeletal pain and can be a challenge to healthcare providers to diagnose and treat. In view of the variability of sciatica symptoms, a great range of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and performance-based measures (PBOs) have been developed for its assessment and management, with however, often poor or controversial results in their reliability and discriminative ability.  Accurate diagnosis of sciatica is crucial to ensure appropriate intervention is given. However, to date there is no gold standard to diagnose sciatica. There has been no systematic review conducted to compare the diagnostic validity of assessment tools of sciatica. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic value of tools (PROMs and PBOs) used to assess patients presenting with sciatica. METHODS: This review informed and reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis-Protocols. PubMed, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, key journals and grey literature searched rigorously to find diagnostic accuracy studies investigating patient with sciatica. Two independent reviewers conducted the search, extracted the data and assessed risk of bias for included studies using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool. The overall quality of included studies evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines.  RESULTS: From 8347 studies, 11 studies were included. Nine studies out of the 11 were at risk of bias. Very low level evidence supports the use of dermatomal patterns and low level evidence supports the use of 7 tools (neurological examination, Βragard test, S-LANSS, ID Pain, PDQ, S-DN4, SQST) for diagnosing sciatica. Moderate level evidence supports a cluster of eight signs (age, duration of disease, paroxysmal pain, pain worse in leg than back, typical dermatomal distribution, worse on coughing/sneezing/straining, finger to floor distance and paresis), twenty items of patient history, self-reported items (pain below knee,  which pain worst, numbness pins and needles), question «worsening of pain during sneezing coughing and straining» and Slump test for diagnosing sciatica. Also, moderate level evidence supports the use of the StEP tool for diagnosing lumbar radicular pain, demonstrating high sensitivity (92%) and specificity (97%) values. SLR showed moderate level evidence in one study and high level evidence in another study in diagnosing sciatica with sensitivity 63.46% and specificity 45.88%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall low-moderate level evidence supports the diagnostic utility of the tools examined in this review in diagnosing sciatica.  The weak evidence base is largely due to methodological flaws and indirectness regarding applicability of the included studies. The most promising diagnostic tools include a cluster of 8 patient history/clinical examination signs, the StEP tool and the SLR test. From these results it is easily understood that history taking has a major role as assessment tool of sciatica in clinical practice. Low risk of bias and high level of evidence diagnostic utility studies are needed, in order for stronger recommendations to be mad

    Conservative management for an esophageal perforation in a patient presented with delayed diagnosis: a case report review of the literature

    Get PDF
    Esophageal perforation is a serious condition with a high mortality rate. Successful therapy depends on the size of the rupture; the time elapsed between rupture and diagnosis, and the underlying health of the patient. Common causes of esophageal perforation include medical instrumentation, foreign-body ingestion, and trauma. A case of esophageal perforation due to fish bone ingestion in a 67-year-old male is described here, with a review of the pertinent literature. The patient presented with chest pain, fever and right-sided pleural effusion. Initial evaluation was nondiagnostic. The water-soluble contrast swallow test showed no evidence of leakage. Computed tomography scan demonstrated a pneumomediastinum, and right-sided hydropneumothorax. The patient was successfully treated using conservative measures
    corecore