7 research outputs found
Features meaningfulness of life among students with different attitudes to the time perspective as a component of sustainable social development
The article is aimed at analyzing the features of life style and meaningfulness of life among students depending on different attitudes to time. The analysis of modern studies of time perspective as a category of psychology is presented; the main components of meaning-life orientations, locus-control of the Ego are described. The object of the study was university students from 18 to 21 years old in the number of 294 people. The following methods were used: F. Zimbardo's time perspective questionnaire; D.A. Leontiev's "Life Orientations" test; Kellerman-Plutchik Lifestyle Index questionnaire, Mann-Whitney U statistical criterion; Spearman rank correlation. It is proved that depending on the respondents' attitude to the time perspective, both the level of meaningfulness of life and the strategy of behavior in stressful situations change. It is concluded that respondents with a focus on the future have a greater meaningfulness of life, they also are more tend to setting life goals. Moreover, the leading types of life styles statistically differ, depending on the the respondersβ attitude to time
Semina selecta, e collectione anni ... quae hortus botanicus Imperialis Petropolitanus pro mutua commutatione offert.
1851-1853, 1856-185
Characteristic Features of the Value-Semantic Sphere of Students with Various Attitudes to Past Experience
The article is devoted to the study of the assessment of past experience in connection with the peculiarities of the value-semantic sphere of students aged 19 to 21 years. It presents a comparative analysis of the results of the study of students of the Faculty of Psychology with various attitudes to past experience, by dividing them into two groups with a positive and neutral-negative assessment of past experience. The analysis is carried out on the basis of a number of techniques that allow one to see the substantive aspects of the value-semantic and motivational spheres of students. The study of value orientations in groups was carried out, differences in the level of significance of the studied values for the respondents were revealed. The study of terminal values showed that a happy family life is the main one for the group with a positive attitude to the past, while for the second group health, love and self-confidence are more important. With regard to instrumental values, it was revealed that a group with a positive assessment of the past considers responsibility as the most important, while the other emphasizes honesty. It was found out that groups with a positive attitude to past experience are distinguished by greater satisfaction with the results of life in the present period of time, meaningful life process and a higher level of motivation
Features meaningfulness of life among students with different attitudes to the time perspective as a component of sustainable social development
The article is aimed at analyzing the features of life style and meaningfulness of life among students depending on different attitudes to time. The analysis of modern studies of time perspective as a category of psychology is presented; the main components of meaning-life orientations, locus-control of the Ego are described. The object of the study was university students from 18 to 21 years old in the number of 294 people. The following methods were used: F. Zimbardo's time perspective questionnaire; D.A. Leontiev's "Life Orientations" test; Kellerman-Plutchik Lifestyle Index questionnaire, Mann-Whitney U statistical criterion; Spearman rank correlation. It is proved that depending on the respondents' attitude to the time perspective, both the level of meaningfulness of life and the strategy of behavior in stressful situations change. It is concluded that respondents with a focus on the future have a greater meaningfulness of life, they also are more tend to setting life goals. Moreover, the leading types of life styles statistically differ, depending on the the respondersβ attitude to time
ΠΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ° ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΌ
Introduction. Social networks are a tool for finding social contacts, emotional support, a means ofself-expression and self-presentation. In the period of so called "crisis of credibility", expressed in alarge amount of unverified and often contradictory information, it is very important to study thepsychological characteristics of students\u27 experience of limited access to social networks such asInstagram* (a Meta Platforms Inc. project, which is banned in Russia). The study of informationalbehavior in recent years has acquired particular relevance, which has been realized in a largenumber of both foreign and russian works. For the first time, an attempt was made to describethe differences in the characteristics of students\u27 experience of limited access to social networks,depending on the actions of respondents after the restriction of access. Methods. The studyinvolved 174 students aged 18 to 21 years (61 boys and 113 girls), students of 1β3 courses of theDon State Technical University. To achieve the goal of the study, the author\u27s questionnaire wasused (I. V. Abakumova, N. E. Komerova, S. V. Ryagin); test of Personal Adjustment (K. Rogers,adapted by A. K. Osnitsky); questionnaire "Strategic approach to coping scale" (SACS) (S. Hobfall,adapted by N. E. Vodopyanova, E. S. Starchenkova). Mathematical methods were the statisticalMann-Whitney U-test; Spearman\u27s rank correlation coefficient. Results. Coping strategies andfeatures of socio-psychological adaptation to stressful situations change depending on theactions of respondents after restricting access to the social network Instagram* (continuation ofuse using VPN applications, termination of use after a ban). Respondents who stopped using theInstagram* social network showed a higher level of avoidance and impulsive actions, less severityof internal control, adaptability, and emotional discomfort than respondents who continuedto use this social network. Discussion. Studies of informational behavior by both domestic andforeign authors emphasize the importance of the virtual space of social networks as a way ofself-presentation, communication, getting support, self-expression, etc., which is consistent withour results that limiting access to the popular resource among young people (Instagram*) canbe perceived as a frustrating event, the loss of a "part" of life, which activates certain copingstrategies and mechanisms of socio-psychological adaptation.ΠΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π‘ΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΠ², ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ, ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ²ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π·Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. ΠΠ° ΡΠΎΠ½Π΅ Β«ΠΊΡΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡΠ° Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΒ», Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΡ Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ Π½Π΅ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, Π²Π΅ΡΡΠΌΠ° Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ ΠΈΠ·ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ° ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΌ, ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΠΌ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Instagram* (ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ Meta Platforms Inc., Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΉ Π² Π ΠΎΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½Π°). Π’Π΅ΠΌΠ° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π³ΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π»Π° ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ Π² Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΡ
, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡ. ΠΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ²ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΡΠ° ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΡΠΊΠ° ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ° ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΌ Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ°. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ 174 ΡΡΡΠ΄Π΅Π½ΡΠ° Π² Π²ΠΎΠ·ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡ 18 Π΄ΠΎ 21 Π³ΠΎΠ΄Π° (61 ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ° ΠΈ 113 Π΄Π΅Π²ΡΡΠ΅ΠΊ), ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅ΡΡ 1-3 ΠΊΡΡΡΠΎΠ² Π€ΠΠΠΠ£ ΠΠ Β«ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π³ΠΎΡΡΠ΄Π°ΡΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ΅Ρ
Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ½ΠΈΠ²Π΅ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΒ». ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Π°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Ρ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ°-ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊ (Π. Π. ΠΠ±Π°ΠΊΡΠΌΠΎΠ²Π°, Π. Π. ΠΠΎΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ²Π°, Π‘. Π. Π ΡΠ³ΠΈΠ½); ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ (Π‘ΠΠ) (Π² Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π. Π. ΠΡΠ½ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ); ΠΎΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊ Β«Π‘ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉΒ» (SACS) (Π‘. Π₯ΠΎΠ±ΡΠΎΠ»Π» Π² Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π. Π. ΠΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΏΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ, Π. Π‘. Π‘ΡΠ°ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ). ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Π°ΠΌΠΈ Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΉ U-ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΠ°Π½Π½Π°βΠ£ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ; ΠΊΠΎΡΡΡΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ°Π½Π³ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π‘ΠΏΠΈΡΠΌΠ΅Π½Π°. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. Π Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ° ΠΊ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ Instagram* (ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΌΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΉ VPN, ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΡΠ»Π΅ Π·Π°ΠΏΡΠ΅ΡΠ°) ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠ½Π³-ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΊ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΠΌ. Π£ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈ Instagram*, Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ Π²ΡΡΠΎΠΊΠΈΠΉ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΈΠ·Π±Π΅Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΡΡ
Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠΉ, ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°Ρ Π²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»Ρ, Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ, ΡΠΌΠΎΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄ΠΈΡΠΊΠΎΠΌΡΠΎΡΡΠ°, ΡΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ. ΠΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ². ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΊ ΠΈ Π·Π°ΡΡΠ±Π΅ΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π°Π²ΡΠΎΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡ Π²Π°ΠΆΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΎΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΡΡΠ²Π° ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠΏΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π° ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π·Π΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΌΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Π΅ΡΠΆΠΊΠΈ, ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΡ., ΡΡΠΎ ΡΠΎΠ³Π»Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Ρ Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΌ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΎΠ³ΡΠ°Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΡΠΏΠ° ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠΏΡΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΌΡ Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ΄Π΅ΠΆΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΡ Instagram*, ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΡΠΈΠ½ΠΈΠΌΠ°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΡΡΡΡΠΈΡΡΡΡΠ΅Π΅ ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠ΅, ΠΏΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡ Β«ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΒ» ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ΅ Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΠΎΠΏΠΈΠ½Π³-ΡΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ
Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΌΡ ΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎ-ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ. 
ΠΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Π΄Π°Π³ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ
Introduction. Meaning-in-life orientations and self-reflection are important indicators of the regulation of personal meanings. In a modern rapidly changing society, individuals do not fully manage their lives due to the influence of various uncertainty factors. The COVID-19 pandemic that began in early 2020 and swept across the world is considered a global factor of uncertainty. The increased uncertainty of life associated with the pandemic is an additional stressor. This paper represents a first effort in obtaining empirical data on gender characteristics of teachersβ meaning-based regulation in the context of the coronavirus pandemic. This paper reports the results of an empirical study of differences in meaning-in-life orientations and self-reflection among teachers before and during the pandemic as different conditions of information uncertainty in their lives. Methods. The study was conducted among female teachers of secondary schools in the Rostov region in March 2017 (nΒ =Β 53) and in October 2020 (nΒ =Β 43), i.e. before and during the pandemic, which can be considered different conditions of information uncertainty in their lives. We used the following psychological assessment tools: (a) the Meaning-in-Life Orientations test by D.Β A.Β Leont\u27ev and (b) the Self-reflection Questionnaire by I.Β A.Β Stetsenko. Results. We observed an increase in all means of both tests during the pandemic, compared to the pre-pandemic values. Differences in all parameters are statistically significant (according to the MannβWhitney U test). Discussion. Our findings indicate that the pandemic represents a surmountable stressor for the homogeneous acmeological category of female teachers surveyed in this study. Information uncertainty contributes to constructive restructuring of the processes of meaning-based regulation and psychological adaptation, which leads to an increase in the level of meaningfulness of life orientations and self-reflection among the respondents.ΠΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. ΠΠ°ΠΆΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ² Π²ΡΡΡΡΠΏΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΡ. Π§Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ, ΠΆΠΈΠ²ΡΡΠΈΠΉ Π² ΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ, Π±ΡΡΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Π΅, Π½Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΡΠΏΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ²ΠΎΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π΄Π΅ΡΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ ΠΈΠ·-Π·Π° Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠ² Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠ°ΡΡΡΠΏΠΈΠ²ΡΠ°Ρ Π² Π½Π°ΡΠ°Π»Π΅ 2020 Π³. ΠΏΠ°Π½Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ COVID-19 ΠΎΡ
Π²Π°ΡΠΈΠ»Π° Π²Π΅ΡΡ ΠΌΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π³Π»ΠΎΠ±Π°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ. ΠΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Ρ Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠ°Π½Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΌ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡΠΎΠΌ. ΠΠΎΠ²ΠΈΠ·Π½Π° ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ Π·Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ°Π΅ΡΡΡ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎ Π³Π΅Π½Π΄Π΅ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠΎΠ±Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΡΡ
ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Π΄Π°Π³ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² Π² ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΏΠ°Π½Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΠ½Π°Π²ΠΈΡΡΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ. Π¦Π΅Π»ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈ ΡΠ²Π»ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΠΉ ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ Ρ ΠΏΠ΅Π΄Π°Π³ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ² Π΄ΠΎ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠ°Π½Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΈΡ
ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ. ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. ΠΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΎΡΡ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½-ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΠΎΠ» Π ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π»Π°ΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠ΅ 2017 Π³. (n = 53) ΠΈ Π² ΠΎΠΊΡΡΠ±ΡΠ΅ 2020 Π³. (n = 43), Ρ. Π΅. Π΄ΠΎ ΠΈ Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠ°Π½Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎ ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°ΡΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠ½ΡΠΌ Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ Π² ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ. Π Π±Π°ΡΠ°ΡΠ΅Ρ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² Π²Ρ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΡ Β«Π‘ΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠ΅ ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈΒ» ΠΏΠΎ Π. Π. ΠΠ΅ΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠ΅Π²Ρ ΠΈ Π°Π½ΠΊΠ΅ΡΠ° ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ Π. Π. Π‘ΡΠ΅ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΊΠΎ. Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. ΠΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΏΠ°Π½Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΅Ρ
ΡΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΎΠ±Π΅ΠΈΡ
ΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎ ΡΡΠ°Π²Π½Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠΌΠΈ Π΄ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°Π½Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΠΈ. Π Π°Π·Π»ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΠΏΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠ°ΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠ°ΠΌ ΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡ ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΡΡ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅ΡΠ½ΠΎΡΡΡ, Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Π΅ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡ ΠΠ°Π½Π½Π° β Π£ΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈ. ΠΠ±ΡΡΠΆΠ΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΎΠ². Π ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΌΠΏΠΈΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΠ°Π½Π΄Π΅ΠΌΠΈΡ Π΄Π»Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π°ΠΊΠΌΠ΅ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ½-ΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΌΠ°ΡΡΠΈΠ²Π°ΡΡΡΡ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΏΡΠ΅ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΠΌΡΠΉ ΡΡΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½ΡΠΉ ΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΎΡ. Π ΡΠ΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΠ΅ Π²ΠΎΠ·Π΄Π΅ΠΉΡΡΠ²ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠΎΡΠΌΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠΈΠ·ΠΎΡΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΡΡΠΊΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΠΏΠ΅ΡΠ΅ΡΡΡΠΎΠΉΠΊΠ° ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΡΠΎΠ² ΡΠΌΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅Π³ΡΠ»ΡΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΈΡ
ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠ°Ρ Π°Π΄Π°ΠΏΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ, ΡΡΠΎ ΠΏΡΠΈΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΎ ΠΊ ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Ρ ΠΎΡΠΌΡΡΠ»Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½Π΅Π½Π½ΡΡ
ΠΎΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΡΠΏΠΎΠ½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΎΠΊ