Risk factors and outcomes for ineffective empiric treatment of sepsis caused by gram-negative pathogens: Stratification by onset of infection

ABSTRACT Sepsis and septic shock remain serious consequences of infections, with reported mortality rates in excess of 40 percent. Timely antibiotic therapy in cases of sepsis and septic shock is recognized as an important determinant of outcome. However, the administration of ineffective empirical treatment (IET) (an initial antibiotic regimen that is not active against the identified pathogen[s] based on in vitro susceptibility testing results) is associated with excess mortality compared to effective empirical treatment (EET). We examined all hospitalized patients at Barnes-Jewish Hospital with a sterile site (blood or pleural, abdominal, cerebrospinal, synovial, and pericardial fluid) culture positive for Gram-negative (GN) bacteria combined with a primary or secondary ICD-9-CM code for severe sepsis (995.92) or septic shock (785.52) between January 2010 and October 2015. Variables significantly associated with early-onset (&lt;48 h of hospitalization) IET of GN sterile site sepsis and septic shock included age, recent hospitalization, and prior intravenous antibiotics. Late-onset IET was associated with increasing numbers of hospitalization days before infection onset and prior intravenous antibiotic administration. For patients with early-onset infection, we found no difference in rates of survival between patients receiving IET and EET. However, patients in the late-onset infection group receiving IET had a statistically lower rate of survival than those receiving EET. These data suggest that risk factors and outcomes for IET can vary based on the time of onset of infection. Our results also highlight the importance of prior intravenous antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for IET in infections by GN bacteria regardless of the time of onset of infection. </jats:p

Augmented renal clearance is not a risk factor for mortality in Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections treated with appropriate empiric antimicrobials

The main objective of the study was to assess whether augmented renal clearance was a risk factor for mortality in a cohort of patients with Enterobacteriaceae sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock that all received appropriate antimicrobial therapy within 12 hours. Using a retrospective cohort from Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1,250-bed teaching hospital, we collected data on individuals with Enterobacteriaceae sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock who received appropriate initial antimicrobial therapy between June 2009 and December 2013. Clinical outcomes were compared according to renal clearance, as assessed by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formulas, sepsis classification, demographics, severity of illness, and comorbidities. We identified 510 patients with Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia and sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock. Sixty-seven patients (13.1%) were nonsurvivors. Augmented renal clearance was uncommon (5.1% of patients by MDRD and 3.0% by CKD-EPI) and was not associated with increased mortality. Our results are limited by the absence of prospective determination of augmented renal clearance. However, in this small cohort, augmented renal clearance as assessed by MDRD and CKD-EPI does not seem to be a risk factor for mortality in patients with Enterobacteriaceae sepsis. Future studies should assess this finding prospectively