9 research outputs found

    Comparison of surgical outcomes between iStent inject W implantation and microhook ab interno trabeculotomy in combination with phacoemulsification in primary open-angle glaucoma patients

    Get PDF
    PurposeTo examine primary open-angle glaucoma patients after undergoing combined cataract surgery with microhook ab interno trabeculotomy (μLOT-Phaco) or iStent inject W implantation (iStent-Phaco), and then evaluate the surgical outcomes after a minimum of 6 months of follow-up.MethodsBetween October 2020 and July 2022, 39 μLOT-Phaco eyes and 55 iStent-Phaco eyes that underwent surgery were evaluated in this retrospective, multicenter comparative case series. Data that included preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, and occurrence of complications were collected from medical records and then examined. Surgical failure was defined as patients exhibiting a < 20% reduction in the preoperative IOP or an IOP > 18 mmHg on two consecutive follow-up visits, or when patients were required to undergo reoperation. Success rates were determined based on a Kaplan–Meier survival analysis.ResultsAt 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, there was a significant postoperative reduction in the IOP (p < 0.001) and in the medications scores (p < 0.001) for both of the groups. In the μLOT-Phaco and iStent-Phaco groups, the probabilities of success at 6 and 12 months were 55.3 and 45.5%, and 48.4 and 45.5% (p = 0.38; log-rank test), respectively. In the iStent-Phaco group, there was a significant decrease in the hyphema.ConclusionComparable surgical outcomes occurred for both the μLOT and iStent inject W procedures

    Changes in Anterior Segment Morphology of Iris Bombe before and after Laser Peripheral Iridotomy in Patients with Uveitic Secondary Glaucoma

    Get PDF
    Purpose. To quantify changes in anterior segment (AS) parameters after laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) using AS-optical coherence tomography (OCT) of iris bombe. Method. AS images of eight eyes were captured before and after iris bombe and more than 2 weeks after LPI (post-LPI) using AS-OCT. We compared the following AS parameters: anterior chamber depth (ACD), anterior chamber volume (ACV), iris curvature (IC), iris thickness at 500 μm from the scleral spur (IT-1) in the middle between the iris root and pupillary margin (IT-2) and 500 μm from the pupillary margin (IT-3) to the anterior chamber angle (ACA) (angle opening distance [AOD750]), and trabecular iris space area. Results. Mean IT-1 and IT-3, but not IT-2, were lower after iris bombe (IT-1, P=0.001; IT-2, P=0.081; and IT-3, P=0.001). There were no significant differences between ACD at pre-LPI and before iris bombe (P=0.096). The mean ACV and AOD750 of iris bombe increased at post-LPI (ACV, P<0.01, and AOD750, P<0.05). The mean IT-1, IT-2, and IT-3 increased at post-LPI (all, P≤0.01). IC decreased at post-LPI (P<0.001), and ACD at post-LPI did not change. Conclusions. The iris extends and becomes thinner during iris bombe. LPI during bombe decreases the IC and increases the ACV and ACA

    Factors affecting eye drop instillation in glaucoma patients with visual field defect.

    No full text
    To investigate the success rate of eye drop instillation in glaucoma patients with visual field defect as well as non-glaucoma volunteers. Factors that may affect the success rate of eye drop instillation were also evaluated.A prospective, observational study.Seventy-eight glaucoma patients and 85 non-glaucoma volunteers were recruited in this study.Open angle glaucoma patients with visual field defect as well as non-glaucoma volunteers were asked to video record their procedures of eye drop instillation using a 5-mL plastic bottle of artificial tear solution. Success of eye drop instillation was judged on video based on the first one drop of solution successfully applied on the cornea, by two investigators.Success rate of eye drop instillation in glaucoma patients and non-glaucoma volunteers. Factors related to success rate of eye drop instillation, such as visual field defect and clinical characteristics, were also analyzed using multivariable logistic regression.No significant deference in mean age was observed between two groups (glaucoma: 64.5 ± 14.4 years, non-glaucoma: 60.9 ± 14.1 years, P = 0.1156). Success rate of eye drop instillation was significantly lower (P = 0.0215) in glaucoma patients (30/78; 38.5%) than in non-glaucoma volunteers (48/85; 56.5%). The most frequent reason of instillation failure in glaucoma patients was touching the bulbar conjunctiva, cornea, eyelid or eyelashes with the tip of the bottle (29.5%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified lower corrected visual acuity (VA) (≤ 1.0; odds ratio [OR] = 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04-0.93, P = 0.0411), lower mean deviation (MD) (< -12 dB; OR = 0.20, 95% CI 0.05-0.86, P = 0.0307) and visual field defect (VFD) in the inferior hemifield (OR = 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.34, P < 0.001) to be significantly related to instillation failure in glaucoma patients.Success rate of eye drop instillation was significantly lower in glaucoma patients than in non-glaucoma volunteers. Corrected VA ≤ 1.0, MD < -12 dB and/or VFD in the inferior hemifield may be related to failure of eye drop instillation

    Comparison of success rates in eye drop instillation between sitting position and supine position.

    No full text
    PURPOSE:To compare the success rates of eye drop instillation in the sitting position and supine position among Japanese patients with ocular diseases (cataract, glaucoma, or retinal and vitreous diseases). METHODS:Patients who were hospitalized in Okayama University Hospital for eye surgery were studied. Instillation procedures of each patient in both the sitting and supine positions were recorded using a video camera at the time of instillation. We defined "success" when one drop fell accurately onto the ocular surface at the first attempt. Instillation of two or more drops, drops delivered to a site other than the eye surface, and touching the eyelashes, eyelids, or conjunctiva with the tip of the eye drop bottle were regarded as "failure". We excluded patients with vision below counting finger. RESULTS:One-hundred and two patients (54 males and 58 females, aged 70.2 ± 12.3 years) with ocular disease who were hospitalized for surgery (cataract: 61.8%, glaucoma: 15.7%, retinal and vitreous diseases: 22.5%) were included in this prospective observational study. The mean duration of eye drop use was 3.1 ± 5.2 years. The success rate of eye drop instillation was significantly higher in the supine position than in the sitting position (64.7% vs. 50%, P = 0.0039). The mean age was significantly higher in the failure group than in the success group (74.0 ± 11.5 vs. 67.7 ± 12.4 years, P = 0.0085) for the sitting position, but not significantly different for the supine position (72.3 ± 12.9 vs. 70.1 ± 12.0 years, P = 0.3849). No significant differences in mean duration of drop use, mean corrected VA, and mean spherical equivalent refraction were observed between success and failure groups, for both sitting and supine positions. CONCLUSIONS:In the present study, the success rate of eye drop instillation was significantly higher when applied in the supine position than in the sitting position
    corecore