6 research outputs found

    Liquid biopsy detects genomic drivers in NSCLC without EGFR mutations by single‐plex testing: WJOG13620L

    No full text
    Abstract Background Actionable tumor genomic alterations, primarily EGFR mutations, occur in nearly 70% of Japanese advanced nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Standard assessment of tumor tissue includes rapid testing for EGFR mutations, ALK fusions and ROS1 fusions. We conducted a prospective observational study (WJOG13620L) of follow‐on next‐generation sequencing of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients without driver alterations after EGFR testing. Methods Patients with untreated advanced (Stage IIIB–IV or relapsed) nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR mutations according to single‐plex testing of tumor tissue, were enrolled into this study. Patients with other known driver mutations or who underwent comprehensive genomic profiling were excluded. Plasma was analyzed by Guardant360, and the primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with pathogenic gene alterations in at least one of nine genes. Results Among the 72 patients enrolled, ALK and ROS1 fusions were tested in 86.1% and 65.2%, respectively. Alterations in pre‐defined genes were detected in 21 patients (29.2%; 95% confidence interval: 19.0–41.1, p < 0.001 [one‐sided null hypothesis proportion of 10%]), including RET fusion (n = 1) and mutations in KRAS (n = 11), EGFR (n = 5), ERBB2 (n = 3), and BRAF (n = 1). Median time from sample submission to results was 8 days (range, 5–17 days). Conclusion Rapid follow‐on comprehensive testing of ctDNA should be considered prior to first‐line treatment for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC when no alterations are detected after single‐plex tissue testing

    Pembrolizumab Plus Amrubicin in Patients With Relapsed SCLC: Multi-Institutional, Single-Arm Phase 2 Study

    No full text
    Introduction: In patients with relapsed SCLC, amrubicin (AMR) is the current standard treatment in Japan. Nevertheless, its efficacy is not satisfactory and prognosis is poor. Preclinical study suggested that anthracycline agent might induce immunogenic cell death and work synergistically with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: Patients with relapsed SCLC who relapsed after completion of platinum-containing regimen were registered. Patients were treated with pembrolizumab (200 mg, flat dose on d 1, every 3 wk for 2 y) plus AMR (40 mg/m2 on d 1–3, every 3 wk until progression). Primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary end points consisted of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and safety. On the basis of the hypothesis that this treatment will improve ORR from 20% to 40% (0.1 of one-sided α and power of 0.8), 25 patients are required (trial identifier: NCT03253068). Results: Between November 2017 and October 2019, a total of 25 patients were enrolled. Most participants (88%) relapsed within 90 days after platinum-containing therapy and all patients were immune checkpoint inhibitor-naive. ORR, the primary end point, was 52.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 31.3%–72.2%). Median PFS was 4.0 months (95% CI: 2.8–7.0 mo), and PFS rate at 1 year was 14.4%. Median overall survival was 10.6 months (95% CI: 7.3–21.3 mo). Common adverse events greater than or equal to grade 3 were neutropenia (64%), leukopenia (40%), and febrile neutropenia (16%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Among patients with relapsed SCLC, pembrolizumab plus AMR was effective and tolerable

    LIS1 and NDEL1 coordinate the plus-end-directed transport of cytoplasmic dynein

    No full text
    LIS1 was first identified as a gene mutated in human classical lissencephaly sequence. LIS1 is required for dynein activity, but the underlying mechanism is poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that LIS1 suppresses the motility of cytoplasmic dynein on microtubules (MTs), whereas NDEL1 releases the blocking effect of LIS1 on cytoplasmic dynein. We demonstrate that LIS1, cytoplasmic dynein and MT fragments co-migrate anterogradely. When LIS1 function was suppressed by a blocking antibody, anterograde movement of cytoplasmic dynein was severely impaired. Immunoprecipitation assay indicated that cytoplasmic dynein forms a complex with LIS1, tubulins and kinesin-1. In contrast, immunoabsorption of LIS1 resulted in disappearance of co-precipitated tubulins and kinesin. Thus, we propose a novel model of the regulation of cytoplasmic dynein by LIS1, in which LIS1 mediates anterograde transport of cytoplasmic dynein to the plus end of cytoskeletal MTs as a dynein–LIS1 complex on transportable MTs, which is a possibility supported by our data
    corecore