The 'true' l-xylulose reductase of filamentous fungi identified in Aspergillus niger

Abstractl-Xylulose reductase is part of the eukaryotic pathway for l-arabinose catabolism. A previously identified l-xylulose reductase in Hypocrea jecorina turned out to be not the ‘true’ one since it was not upregulated during growth on l-arabinose and the deletion strain showed no reduced l-xylulose reductase activity but instead lost the d-mannitol dehydrogenase activity [17]. In this communication we identified the ‘true’ l-xylulose reductase in Aspergillus niger. The gene, lxrA (JGI177736), is upregulated on l-arabinose and the deletion results in a strain lacking the NADPH-specific l-xylulose reductase activity and having reduced growth on l-arabinose. The purified enzyme had a Km for l-xylulose of 25mM and a νmax of 650U/mg

Sorbitol dehydrogenase of Aspergillus niger, SdhA, is part of the oxido-reductive d-galactose pathway and essential for d-sorbitol catabolism

AbstractIn filamentous fungi d-galactose can be catabolised through the oxido-reductive and/or the Leloir pathway. In the oxido-reductive pathway d-galactose is converted to d-fructose in a series of steps where the last step is the oxidation of d-sorbitol by an NAD-dependent dehydrogenase. We identified a sorbitol dehydrogenase gene, sdhA (JGI53356), in Aspergillus niger encoding a medium chain dehydrogenase which is involved in d-galactose and d-sorbitol catabolism. The gene is upregulated in the presence of d-galactose, galactitol and d-sorbitol. An sdhA deletion strain showed reduced growth on galactitol and growth on d-sorbitol was completely abolished. The purified enzyme converted d-sorbitol to d-fructose with Km of 50±5mM and vmax of 80±10U/mg

Glycolic acid production in the engineered yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis

BACKGROUND: Glycolic acid is a C2 hydroxy acid that is a widely used chemical compound. It can be polymerised to produce biodegradable polymers with excellent gas barrier properties. Currently, glycolic acid is produced in a chemical process using fossil resources and toxic chemicals. Biotechnological production of glycolic acid using renewable resources is a desirable alternative. RESULTS: The yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Kluyveromyces lactis are suitable organisms for glycolic acid production since they are acid tolerant and can grow in the presence of up to 50 g l(-1) glycolic acid. We engineered S. cerevisiae and K. lactis for glycolic acid production using the reactions of the glyoxylate cycle to produce glyoxylic acid and then reducing it to glycolic acid. The expression of a high affinity glyoxylate reductase alone already led to glycolic acid production. The production was further improved by deleting genes encoding malate synthase and the cytosolic form of isocitrate dehydrogenase. The engineered S. cerevisiae strain produced up to about 1 g l(-1) of glycolic acid in a medium containing d-xylose and ethanol. Similar modifications in K. lactis resulted in a much higher glycolic acid titer. In a bioreactor cultivation with d-xylose and ethanol up to 15 g l(-1) of glycolic acid was obtained. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first demonstration of engineering yeast to produce glycolic acid. Prior to this work glycolic acid production through the glyoxylate cycle has only been reported in bacteria. The benefit of a yeast host is the possibility for glycolic acid production also at low pH, which was demonstrated in flask cultivations. Production of glycolic acid was first shown in S. cerevisiae. To test whether a Crabtree negative yeast would be better suited for glycolic acid production we engineered K. lactis in the same way and demonstrated it to be a better host for glycolic acid production