48 research outputs found

    A Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating the Preventive Effectiveness of Lactobacillus Vaginal Suppositories in Patients with Recurrent Cystitis

    Get PDF
    Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common bacterial infections in women, and many patients experience frequent recurrence. The aim of this report is to introduce an on-going prospective phase II clinical trial performed to evaluate the preventive effectiveness of Lactobacillus vaginal suppositories for prevention of recurrent cystitis. Patients enrolled in this study are administered vaginal suppositories containing the GAI 98322 strain of Lactobacillus crispatus every 2 days or 3 times a week for one year. The primary endpoint is recurrence of cystitis and the secondary endpoints are adverse events. Recruitment began in December 2013 and target sample size is 20 participants

    The Efficacy of Rituximab in High-risk Renal Transplant Recipients

    Get PDF
    Although graft survival following renal transplantation (RTx) has improved, outcomes following highrisk RTx are variable. Preexisting antibodies, including donor-specific antibodies (DSA), play an important role in graft dysfunction and survival. We have designed a study to investigate the safety and efficacy of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (rituximab) in high-risk RTx recipients. Major eligibility criteria include: 1) major and minor ABO blood group mismatch, 2) positive DSA. Thirty-five patients will receive 200 mg/body of rituximab. The primary endpoint is the incidence of B cell depletion. This study will clarify whether rituximab is efficacious in improving graft survival in high-risk RTx recipients

    A comparison between hospital follow‐up and collaborative follow‐up in patients with acute heart failure

    Get PDF
    AIMS: There are no previous studies focusing on collaborative follow-ups between hospitals and clinics for patients discharged after acute heart failure (AHF) in Japan. The purpose of this study was to determine the status of collaboration between hospitals and clinics for patients with AHF in Japan and to compare patient characteristics and clinical outcomes using a large Japanese observational database. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 4056 consecutive patients hospitalized for AHF in the Kyoto Congestive Heart Failure registry, we analysed 2862 patients discharged to go home, who were divided into 1674 patients (58.5%) followed up at hospitals with index hospitalization (hospital follow-up group) and 1188 (41.5%) followed up in a collaborative fashion with clinics or other general hospitals (collaborative follow-up group). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or heart failure (HF) hospitalization within 1 year after discharge. Previous hospitalization for HF and length of hospital stay longer than 15 days were associated with hospital follow-up. Conversely, ≥80 years of age, hypertension, and cognitive dysfunction were associated with collaborative follow-up. The cumulative 1-year incidence of the primary outcome, all cause death, and cardiovascular death were similar between the hospital and collaborative follow-up groups (31.6% vs. 29.6%, P = 0.51, 13.1% vs, 13.9%, P = 0.35, 8.4% vs. 8.2%, P = 0.96). Even after adjusting for confounders, the difference in risk for patients in the hospital follow-up group relative to those in the collaborative follow-up group remained insignificant for the primary outcome, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.97-1.27, P = 0.14, HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.91-1.33, P = 0.33, HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.87-1.05, P = 0.33). The cumulative 1-year incidence of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow-up group than in the collaborative follow-up group (25.5% vs. 21.3%, P = 0.02). The risk of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow-up group than in the collaborative follow-up group (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.01-1.39, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In patients hospitalized for AHF, 41.5% received collaborative follow-up after discharge. The risk of HF hospitalization was higher in the hospital follow-up group than in the collaborative follow-up, although risk of the primary outcome, all-cause death, and cardiovascular death were similar between groups

    Initial Surgical Versus Conservative Strategies in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis

    Get PDF
    AbstractBackgroundCurrent guidelines generally recommend watchful waiting until symptoms emerge for aortic valve replacement (AVR) in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS).ObjectivesThe study sought to compare the long-term outcomes of initial AVR versus conservative strategies following the diagnosis of asymptomatic severe AS.MethodsWe used data from a large multicenter registry enrolling 3,815 consecutive patients with severe AS (peak aortic jet velocity >4.0 m/s, or mean aortic pressure gradient >40 mm Hg, or aortic valve area <1.0 cm2) between January 2003 and December 2011. Among 1,808 asymptomatic patients, the initial AVR and conservative strategies were chosen in 291 patients, and 1,517 patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 1,361 days with 90% follow-up rate at 2 years. The propensity score–matched cohort of 582 patients (n = 291 in each group) was developed as the main analysis set for the current report.ResultsBaseline characteristics of the propensity score–matched cohort were largely comparable, except for the slightly younger age and the greater AS severity in the initial AVR group. In the conservative group, AVR was performed in 41% of patients during follow-up. The cumulative 5-year incidences of all-cause death and heart failure hospitalization were significantly lower in the initial AVR group than in the conservative group (15.4% vs. 26.4%, p = 0.009; 3.8% vs. 19.9%, p < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionsThe long-term outcome of asymptomatic patients with severe AS was dismal when managed conservatively in this real-world analysis and might be substantially improved by an initial AVR strategy. (Contemporary Outcomes After Surgery and Medical Treatment in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis Registry; UMIN000012140

    Association between PPARGC1A polymorphisms and the occurrence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Genetic factors as well as environmental factors are important in the development of NAFLD and in this study we investigated associations between polymorphisms of peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α polymorphism (<it>PPARGC1A</it>) and NAFLD.</p> <p>Aims</p> <p>We recruited 115 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD, 65 with NASH and 50 with simple steatosis, and 441 healthy control subjects and investigated 15 SNPs of <it>PPARGC1A</it>.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>SNP rs2290602 had the lowest <it>p </it>value in the dominant mode (<it>p </it>= 0.00095), and the odds ratio for NAFLD (95% CI) was 2.73 (1.48 – 5.06). rs2290602 was significantly associated with NAFLD even when the most conservative Bonferroni's correction was applied (<it>p </it>= 0.0143). The frequency of the T allele of rs2290602 was significantly higher in the NASH patients than in the control subjects (<it>p </it>= 0.00093, allele frequency mode), and its frequency in the NASH patients tended to be higher than in the simple steatosis patients (<it>p </it>= 0.09). The results of the real-time RT-PCR study showed that intrahepatic mRNA expression of <it>PPARGC1A </it>was lower in the TT group than in the GG or GT group at SNP rs2290602 (p = 0.0454).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>This is the first study to demonstrate a significant association between genetic variations in <it>PPARGC1A </it>and NAFLD. This finding suggested that <it>PPARGC1A </it>polymorphism and lower expression of <it>PPARGC1A </it>mRNA in the liver are an important genetic contribution to etiology of NAFLD.</p

    A Simple UPLC-MS/MS Assay of Rifampin in a Small Volume of Human Plasma

    No full text
    Rifampin (RIF) is a typical cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inducer and inhibitor of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 to assess drug–drug interaction (DDI) via CYP3A or OATP1B1 in clinical settings. To ensure sufficient exposure of RIF in DDI studies, it is important to determine plasma RIF concentrations. In this study, we developed a simple RIF assay in a small volume of human plasma by ultraperformance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. RIF in 0.02 mL of plasma was extracted using protein precipitation and separated on a reverse phase column under gradient elution of three mobile phases, where the mobile phase C containing 1% formic acid was exclusively used to reduce the carryover of RIF. RIF and the internal standard were detected by multiple reaction monitoring in positive-ion electrospray ionization. RIF was quantifiable at 0.025–10 μg/mL without the carryover issue. The intra- and inter-run assays confirmed the reproducibility of the assay. Stability assessments ensured that RIF in human plasma was stable for 6 h at room temperature and for 409 days at −15 °C or below. The assay was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study with successful incurred sample reanalysis

    A Simple UPLC-MS/MS Assay of Rifampin in a Small Volume of Human Plasma

    No full text
    Rifampin (RIF) is a typical cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inducer and inhibitor of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 to assess drug–drug interaction (DDI) via CYP3A or OATP1B1 in clinical settings. To ensure sufficient exposure of RIF in DDI studies, it is important to determine plasma RIF concentrations. In this study, we developed a simple RIF assay in a small volume of human plasma by ultraperformance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. RIF in 0.02 mL of plasma was extracted using protein precipitation and separated on a reverse phase column under gradient elution of three mobile phases, where the mobile phase C containing 1% formic acid was exclusively used to reduce the carryover of RIF. RIF and the internal standard were detected by multiple reaction monitoring in positive-ion electrospray ionization. RIF was quantifiable at 0.025–10 μg/mL without the carryover issue. The intra- and inter-run assays confirmed the reproducibility of the assay. Stability assessments ensured that RIF in human plasma was stable for 6 h at room temperature and for 409 days at −15 °C or below. The assay was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study with successful incurred sample reanalysis
    corecore