10 research outputs found

    The results of the spatial survey.

    No full text
    <p>(a) The estimated abundance of <i>C</i>. <i>pacifica</i> at the day of survey based on the visual survey. (b) The concentration of <i>C</i>. <i>pacifica</i> eDNA at the surface and (c) on the sea floor.</p

    The schematic drawing of the sampling point for temporal survey and the results.

    No full text
    <p>(a) The schematic drawing of the sampling point for temporal survey conducted at the pier of Maizuru Fisheries Station, Kyoto University. The surface and sea floor water samples were collected at three (A, B, and C) points where the water depth is 4, 6, and 8 m, respectively. (b) The temporal change of observed numbers of <i>C</i>. <i>pacifica</i> in the visual survey and the eDNA concentration in each surface sample. (c) Temporal change in observed numbers of <i>C</i>. <i>pacifica</i> in the visual survey and eDNA concentration in each sea floor sample. Note that the observed numbers of individuals were presented as the average of 10 days and that the same observation data were presented in (b) and (c) for better visibility.</p

    The results of the tank experiments.

    No full text
    <p>(a) Time dependent change of eDNA concentration (copies L<sup>-1</sup>) in the tank experiment. (b) Relative eDNA concentration, i.e., the concentration at time <i>t</i> divided by the initial concentration in the tank, represents the combined exponential degradation in all three tanks. The exponential regression curve for the eDNA degradation was y = 0.998e<sup>-0.0335x</sup> (where x and y mean time in hour and relative DNA concentration at time x, respectively).</p

    The comparison between eDNA concentrations of surface and sea floor samples.

    No full text
    <p>The eDNA concentrations in the sea floor were significantly higher than that of surface samples (Wilcoxon signed rank test, <i>P</i> = 0.00051).</p

    Observed fish biomass using echo sounder.

    No full text
    <p>Vertical bar on the cruise track (gray line) indicates local s<sub>a</sub> values (i.e., fish biomass observed using quantitative echo sounder), which is the integrated s<sub>v</sub> of a water column with a cross-sectional area of 1 m<sup>2</sup>. This figure is depicted according to s<sub>a</sub> extracted every 80-m intervals. Note that this figure shows a summary of field observation using echo sounder. We used s<sub>v</sub> values rather than s<sub>a</sub> values as index of fish biomass in regression analyses (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0149786#pone.0149786.s001" target="_blank">S1 Fig</a>).</p

    Correlation coefficient between eDNA concentration in surface and bottom waters.

    No full text
    <p>Y-axis indicates vertical distance between surface- and bottom-sampling positions, i.e., the coefficient value of the class of 3.5–8.5 m was calculated using samples obtained at stations where water depth is 3.5–8.5 m. Correlation coefficient was relatively high when using samples from shallower stations, while it was low when using samples from deeper stations. This figure was depicted based on eDNA concentrations of filter series 1.</p

    Spatial approximation of jack mackerel eDNA concentration.

    No full text
    <p>Based on CytB gene copy number in a 2 μL template DNA solution at the 47 sampling station, spatial variation of jack mackerel eDNA in west Maizuru Bay was estimated by approximation. The level of the approximate eDNA concentration is indicated by colors between red (relatively high concentration) and blue (low concentration). White areas suggest that the concentration approximated using a regularized spline is ≤ 0. Spatial approximation was performed using a regularized spline with a tension parameter of 40.</p
    corecore