JIB-04 has broad-spectrum antiviral activity and inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication and coronavirus pathogenesis

Pathogenic coronaviruses are a major threat to global public health. Here, using a recombinant reporter virus-based compound screening approach, we identified small-molecule inhibitors that potently block the replication of severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Among them, JIB-04 inhibited SARS-CoV-2 replication in Vero E6 cells with a 50% effective concentration of 695 nM, with a specificity index of greater than 1,000. JIB-04 showe

Novel insights into the genomic integration site landscape of HIV-1 and other retrovirus genera

An important event during infection by retroviruses such as human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is the permanent integration of the viral genome into the host genome. This event leads to life-long infection and is accompanied by a period of quiescence/latency ranging from a few years to \u3e10 years where HIV-1 expression is barely detectable or undetectable. Despite the use of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) which controls HIV-1 infection, quiescent/latent virus presents a major obstacle towards a functional cure. Integration site location in the genome is thought to contribute to latent infections and has the potential to confound anti-latency treatments, necessitating a greater understanding of the effects of integration site location on latency. To examine the global preference for integration location, we performed an extensive bioinformatics analysis on the integration site profile of HIV-1 and other retroviruses. We found that HIV-1 integration sites and that of other retroviruses are enriched in and/or near non-B DNA motifs. Non-B DNA are secondary structures in our genome formed by specific nucleotide sequences that exhibit non-canonical DNA base pairing. We demonstrated a strong correlation between integration sites in and near guanine-quadruplex (G4) motifs, a type of non-B DNA associated with transcriptional silencing, and reactivation of latent proviruses with latency reversal agents. Additionally, integration site studies have focused on HIV-1 subtype B infections; however, infections with other subtypes exist worldwide. A comparative analysis of 62 infected individuals with different HIV-1 subtypes showed significant differences in the integration site profiles between different subtypes, which was further altered by cART. Finally, we examined HIV-1 integration site profiles in anatomical sites and showed distinct integration profiles from peripheral blood, brain, and the gastrointestinal tract. Overall, our findings identified similarities and differences in the integration site profiles among evolutionarily diverse retroviruses. Notably, we have implicated non-B DNA as a new factor that influences integration site targeting and may play an important role in the establishment of HIV-1 latency and/or disease progression

Specialized DNA Structures Act as Genomic Beacons for Integration by Evolutionarily Diverse Retroviruses

Retroviral integration site targeting is not random and plays a critical role in expression and long-term survival of the integrated provirus. To better understand the genomic environment surrounding retroviral integration sites, we performed a meta-analysis of previously published integration site data from evolutionarily diverse retroviruses, including new experimental data from HIV-1 subtypes A, B, C and D. We show here that evolutionarily divergent retroviruses exhibit distinct integration site profiles with strong preferences for integration near non-canonical B-form DNA (non-B DNA). We also show that in vivo-derived HIV-1 integration sites are significantly more enriched in transcriptionally silent regions and transcription-silencing non-B DNA features of the genome compared to in vitro-derived HIV-1 integration sites. Integration sites from individuals infected with HIV-1 subtype A, B, C or D viruses exhibited different preferences for common genomic and non-B DNA features. In addition, we identified several integration site hotspots shared between different HIV-1 subtypes, all of which were located in the non-B DNA feature slipped DNA. Together, these data show that although evolutionarily divergent retroviruses exhibit distinct integration site profiles, they all target non-B DNA for integration. These findings provide new insight into how retroviruses integrate into genomes for long-term survival

Specialized DNA Structures Act as Genomic Beacons for Integration by Evolutionarily Diverse Retroviruses

Retroviral integration site targeting is not random and plays a critical role in expression and long-term survival of the integrated provirus. To better understand the genomic environment surrounding retroviral integration sites, we performed a meta-analysis of previously published integration site data from evolutionarily diverse retroviruses, including new experimental data from HIV-1 subtypes A, B, C and D. We show here that evolutionarily divergent retroviruses exhibit distinct integration site profiles with strong preferences for integration near non-canonical B-form DNA (non-B DNA). We also show that in vivo-derived HIV-1 integration sites are significantly more enriched in transcriptionally silent regions and transcription-silencing non-B DNA features of the genome compared to in vitro-derived HIV-1 integration sites. Integration sites from individuals infected with HIV-1 subtype A, B, C or D viruses exhibited different preferences for common genomic and non-B DNA features. In addition, we identified several integration site hotspots shared between different HIV-1 subtypes, all of which were located in the non-B DNA feature slipped DNA. Together, these data show that although evolutionarily divergent retroviruses exhibit distinct integration site profiles, they all target non-B DNA for integration. These findings provide new insight into how retroviruses integrate into genomes for long-term survival

G-Quadruplex DNA and Other Non-Canonical B-Form DNA Motifs Influence Productive and Latent HIV-1 Integration and Reactivation Potential

The integration of the HIV-1 genome into the host genome is an essential step in the life cycle of the virus and it plays a critical role in the expression, long-term persistence, and reactivation of HIV expression. To better understand the local genomic environment surrounding HIV-1 proviruses, we assessed the influence of non-canonical B-form DNA (non-B DNA) on the HIV-1 integration site selection. We showed that productively and latently infected cells exhibit different integration site biases towards non-B DNA motifs. We identified a correlation between the integration sites of the latent proviruses and non-B DNA features known to potently influence gene expression (e.g., cruciform, guanine-quadruplex (G4), triplex, and Z-DNA). The reactivation potential of latent proviruses with latency reversal agents also correlated with their proximity to specific non-B DNA motifs. The perturbation of G4 structures in vitro using G4 structure-destabilizing or -stabilizing ligands resulted in a significant reduction in integration within 100 base pairs of G4 motifs. The stabilization of G4 structures increased the integration within 300-500 base pairs from G4 motifs, increased integration near transcription start sites, and increased the proportion of latently infected cells. Moreover, we showed that host lens epithelium-derived growth factor (LEDGF)/p75 and cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 6 (CPSF6) influenced the distribution of integration sites near several non-B DNA motifs, especially G4 DNA. Our findings identify non-B DNA motifs as important factors that influence productive and latent HIV-1 integration and the reactivation potential of latent proviruses

Antiretroviral APOBEC3 cytidine deaminases alter HIV-1 provirus integration site profiles

Antiretroviral APOBEC3 may contribute to HIV-1 latency. In this study, Ajoge and Renner et al. identify a previously undescribed function of human APOBEC3 proteins in redirecting integrations of HIV-1 DNA into more transcriptionally inactive regions of the genome