14 research outputs found

    Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill running. A validation study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>One major drawback in measuring ground-reaction forces during running is that it is time consuming to get representative ground-reaction force (GRF) values with a traditional force platform. An instrumented force measuring treadmill can overcome the shortcomings inherent to overground testing. The purpose of the current study was to determine the validity of an instrumented force measuring treadmill for measuring vertical ground-reaction force parameters during running.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Vertical ground-reaction forces of experienced runners (12 male, 12 female) were obtained during overground and treadmill running at slow, preferred and fast self-selected running speeds. For each runner, 7 mean vertical ground-reaction force parameters of the right leg were calculated based on five successful overground steps and 30 seconds of treadmill running data. Intraclass correlations (ICC<sub>(3,1)</sub>) and ratio limits of agreement (RLOA) were used for further analysis.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Qualitatively, the overground and treadmill ground-reaction force curves for heelstrike runners and non-heelstrike runners were very similar. Quantitatively, the time-related parameters and active peak showed excellent agreement (ICCs between 0.76 and 0.95, RLOA between 5.7% and 15.5%). Impact peak showed modest agreement (ICCs between 0.71 and 0.76, RLOA between 19.9% and 28.8%). The maximal and average loading-rate showed modest to excellent ICCs (between 0.70 and 0.89), but RLOA were higher (between 34.3% and 45.4%).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>The results of this study demonstrated that the treadmill is a moderate to highly valid tool for the assessment of vertical ground-reaction forces during running for runners who showed a consistent landing strategy during overground and treadmill running. The high stride-to-stride variance during both overground and treadmill running demonstrates the importance of measuring sufficient steps for representative ground-reaction force values. Therefore, an instrumented treadmill seems to be suitable for measuring representative vertical ground-reaction forces during running.</p

    A simple field validation of daily transpiration derived from sapflow using a porometer and minimal meteorological data

    No full text
    The original publication can be found at www.springerlink.comHeat-pulse techniques are routinely used to estimate transpiration from canopies of woody plants typically without any local calibration, mainly because of the difficulty of doing so in the field and, frequently, lack of detailed weather data. This is despite concerns that the techniques may produce erroneous values under certain conditions, such as when evaporative demand is high. In this study, we used a micrometeorological approach to validate transpiration from irrigated olives deduced from heat-pulse technique by ascertaining precise values for the parameters that are critical for converting heat-pulse velocity to sapflow. The micrometeorological approach involved limited data on stomatal conductance (gs), obtained hourly with a porometer on four contrasting days, and was used to calibrate a simple model for predicting conductance. Predicted stomatal conductance (gsm) agreed well with that measured, and when both were used to calculate hourly transpiration, they produced values that were within 10% of each other. This was despite brief underestimations of transpiration based on gsm (Tm) in the early hours of the day that arose from poor determination of incident radiation at this time. We then used Tm to iteratively set the values for the various parameters, including the time-out value that accounts for zero-flow conditions, needed to convert heat-pulse velocity to sapflow, for the four days. The best fit between Tm and transpiration from sapflow (Ts) was obtained with time-out value set to 120 s. All heat-pulse velocity data were therefore analysed with this time-out value to obtain sapflow and, hence, transpiration (Ts). Comparison of Tm and Ts for the whole season showed that the former tended to produce higher values on certain days when vapour pressure deficit (D) was high in summer (December–February). While Ts occasionally produced larger values than Tm under the mild conditions of autumn (March–April). Totals of the daily transpiration during the 190-day period were within 10% of each other.Isa A. M. Yunusa, Ian K. Nuberg, Sigfredo Fuentes, Ping Lu and Derek Eamu
    corecore