21 research outputs found

    Math1 Is Essential for the Development of Hindbrain Neurons Critical for Perinatal Breathing

    Get PDF
    SummaryMice lacking the proneural transcription factor Math1 (Atoh1) lack multiple neurons of the proprioceptive and arousal systems and die shortly after birth from an apparent inability to initiate respiration. We sought to determine whether Math1 was necessary for the development of hindbrain nuclei involved in respiratory rhythm generation, such as the parafacial respiratory group/retrotrapezoid nucleus (pFRG/RTN), defects in which are associated with congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (CCHS). We generated a Math1-GFP fusion allele to trace the development of Math1-expressing pFRG/RTN and paratrigeminal neurons and found that loss of Math1 did indeed disrupt their migration and differentiation. We also identified Math1-dependent neurons and their projections near the pre-Bötzinger complex, a structure critical for respiratory rhythmogenesis, and found that glutamatergic modulation reestablished a rhythm in the absence of Math1. This study identifies Math1-dependent neurons that are critical for perinatal breathing that may link proprioception and arousal with respiration

    Expression and regulation of Xenopus CRMP-4 in the developing nervous system.

    No full text
    The collaspin response mediator proteins (CRMPs) are a family of cytosolic phosphoproteins which play a critical role in the establishment of neuronal polarity and growth cone guidance. Here, we describe the temporal and spatial expression of CRMP-4 during early Xenopus embryogenesis. CRMP-4 transcripts were first detected by whole mount in situ hybridization at the end of gastrulation in the prospective neuroectoderm. During open neural plate stages, CRMP-4 was expressed broadly throughout the anterior neural plate and in the three bilateral stripes of the posterior neural plate where primary neurons arise. The expression in the territories of primary neurogenesis prefigures that of the post-mitotic neuronal marker N-tubulin. At tadpole stages, expression was maintained throughout the central nervous system and in the retina of the eye. Consistent with the observed expression, CRMP-4 transcripts are positively regulated by X-ngnr-1 and negatively by Notch signaling. The observed expression and regulation of CRMP-4 differ from that of the CRMP-2, which is induced by the events of neural induction.Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tSCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    Mxi1 is essential for neurogenesis in Xenopus and acts by bridging the pan-neural and proneural genes.

    No full text
    We have isolated and characterized Xenopus Mxi1, a member of the Myc/Max/Mad family of bHLHZip transcription factors. Xmxi1 transcripts are present during gastrulation and early neurula stages, earlier and in broader domains as compared to the neuronal determination factor neurogenin (X-ngnr-1). Consistent with an early role in neurogenesis, Xmxi1 is positively regulated by Sox3, SoxD, and proneural genes, as well as negatively by the Notch pathway. Loss-of-function experiments demonstrate an essential role for Xmxi1 in the establishment of a mature neural state that can be activated by factors that induce neuronal differentiation, such as SoxD and X-ngnr-1. Overexpression of Xmxi1 in Xenopus embryos results in ectopic activation of Sox3, an early pan-neural marker of proliferating neural precursor cells. Within the neural plate, the neuronal differentiation marker N-tubulin and cell cycle control genes such as XPak3 and p27(Xic1) are inhibited, but the expression of early determination and differentiation markers, including X-ngnr-1 and X-MyT1, is not affected. Inhibition of neuronal differentiation by Xmxi1 is only transient, and, at early tailbud stages, both endogenous and ectopic neurogenesis are observed. While Xmxi1 enhances cell proliferation and apoptosis in the early Xenopus embryo, both activities appear not to be required for the function of Xmxi1 in primary neurogenesis.Journal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe

    TFE3 regulates whole-body energy metabolism in cooperation with TFEB

    No full text
    TFE3 and TFEB are members of the MiT family of HLH-leucine zipper transcription factors. Recent studies demonstrated that they bind overlapping sets of promoters and are post-transcriptionally regulated through a similar mechanism. However, while Tcfeb knockout (KO) mice die during early embryonic development, no apparent phenotype was reported in Tfe3 KO mice. Thus raising the need to characterize the physiological role of TFE3 and elucidate its relationship with TFEB TFE3 deficiency resulted in altered mitochondrial morphology and function both in vitro and in vivo due to compromised mitochondrial dynamics. In addition, Tfe3 KO mice showed significant abnormalities in energy balance and alterations in systemic glucose and lipid metabolism, resulting in enhanced diet-induced obesity and diabetes. Conversely, viral-mediated TFE3 overexpression improved the metabolic abnormalities induced by high-fat diet (HFD). Both TFEB overexpression in Tfe3 KO mice and TFE3 overexpression in Tcfeb liver-specific KO mice (Tcfeb LiKO) rescued HFD-induced obesity, indicating that TFEB can compensate for TFE3 deficiency and vice versa Analysis of Tcfeb LiKO/Tfe3 double KO mice demonstrated that depletion of both TFE3 and TFEB results in additive effects with an exacerbation of the hepatic phenotype. These data indicate that TFE3 and TFEB play a cooperative, rather than redundant, role in the control of the adaptive response of whole-body metabolism to environmental cues such as diet and physical exercise

    Transcriptional Regulation by ATOH1 and its Target SPDEF in the IntestineSummary

    Get PDF
    Background & Aims: The transcription factor atonal homolog 1 (ATOH1) controls the fate of intestinal progenitors downstream of the Notch signaling pathway. Intestinal progenitors that escape Notch activation express high levels of ATOH1 and commit to a secretory lineage fate, implicating ATOH1 as a gatekeeper for differentiation of intestinal epithelial cells. Although some transcription factors downstream of ATOH1, such as SPDEF, have been identified to specify differentiation and maturation of specific cell types, the bona fide transcriptional targets of ATOH1 still largely are unknown. Here, we aimed to identify ATOH1 targets and to identify transcription factors that are likely to co-regulate gene expression with ATOH1. Methods: We used a combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation and messenger RNAâbased high-throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq and RNA-seq), together with cell sorting and transgenic mice, to identify direct targets of ATOH1, and establish the epistatic relationship between ATOH1 and SPDEF. Results: By using unbiased genome-wide approaches, we identified more than 700 genes as ATOH1 transcriptional targets in adult small intestine and colon. Ontology analysis indicated that ATOH1 directly regulates genes involved in specification and function of secretory cells. De novo motif analysis of ATOH1 targets identified SPDEF as a putative transcriptional co-regulator of ATOH1. Functional epistasis experiments in transgenic mice show that SPDEF amplifies ATOH1-dependent transcription but cannot independently initiate transcription of ATOH1 target genes. Conclusions: This study unveils the direct targets of ATOH1 in the adult intestines and illuminates the transcriptional events that initiate the specification and function of intestinal secretory lineages. Keywords: ATOH1, SPDEF, Transcription, Intestinal Epithelium, Villin-creER, TRE-Spdef, Atoh1GFP, Atoh1Fla

    Hypermitotic meningiomas harbor DNA methylation subgroups with distinct biological and clinical features

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Meningiomas, the most common primary intracranial tumors, can be separated into 3 DNA methylation groups with distinct biological drivers, clinical outcomes, and therapeutic vulnerabilities. Alternative meningioma grouping schemes using copy number variants, gene expression profiles, somatic short variants, or integrated molecular models have been proposed. These data suggest meningioma DNA methylation groups may harbor subgroups unifying contrasting theories of meningioma biology. METHODS: A total of 565 meningioma DNA methylation profiles from patients with comprehensive clinical follow-up at independent discovery (n = 200) or validation (n = 365) institutions were reanalyzed and classified into Merlin-intact, Immune-enriched, or Hypermitotic DNA methylation groups. RNA sequencing from the discovery (n = 200) or validation (n = 302) cohort were analyzed in the context of DNA methylation groups to identify subgroups. Biological features and clinical outcomes were analyzed across meningioma grouping schemes. RESULTS: RNA sequencing revealed differential enrichment of FOXM1 target genes across two subgroups of Hypermitotic meningiomas. Differential expression and ontology analyses showed the subgroup of Hypermitotic meningiomas without FOXM1 target gene enrichment was distinguished by gene expression programs driving macromolecular metabolism. Analysis of genetic, epigenetic, gene expression, or cellular features revealed Hypermitotic meningioma subgroups were concordant with Proliferative or Hypermetabolic meningiomas, which were previously reported alongside Merlin-intact and Immune-enriched tumors using an integrated molecular model. The addition of DNA methylation subgroups to clinical models refined the prediction of postoperative outcomes compared to the addition of DNA methylation groups. CONCLUSIONS: Meningiomas can be separated into three DNA methylation groups and Hypermitotic meningiomas can be subdivided into Proliferative and Hypermetabolic subgroups, each with distinct biological and clinical features.</p
    corecore