5 research outputs found

    Feasibility of low-dose digital pulsed video-fluoroscopic swallow exams (VFSE): effects on radiation dose and image quality

    Get PDF
    Background: Fluoroscopy is a frequently used examination in clinical routine without appropriate research evaluation latest hardware and software equipment. Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of low-dose pulsed video-fluoroscopic swallowing exams (pVFSE) to reduce dose exposure in patients with swallowing disorders compared to high-resolution radiograph examinations (hrVFSE) serving as standard of reference. Material and Methods: A phantom study (Alderson-Rando Phantom, 60 thermoluminescent dosimeters [TLD]) was performed for dose measurements. Acquisition parameters were as follows: (i) pVFSE: 76.7 kV, 57 mA, 0.9 Cu mm, pulse rate/s 30;(ii) hrVFSE: 68.0 kV, 362 mA, 0.2 Cu mm, pictures 30/s. The dose area product (DAP) indicated by the detector system and the radiation dose derived from the TLD measurements were analyzed. In a patient study, image quality was assessed qualitatively (5-point Likert scale, 5 = hrVFSE;two independent readers) and quantitatively (SNR) in 35 patients who subsequently underwent contrast-enhanced pVFSE and hrVFSE. Results: Phantom measurements showed a dose reduction per picture of factor 25 for pVFSE versus hrVFSE images (0.0025 mGy versus 0.062 mGy). The DAP (mu Gym 2) was 28.0 versus 810.5 (pVFSE versus hrVFSE) for an average examination time of 30 s. Direct and scattered organ doses were significantly lower for pVFSE as compared to hrVFSE (P< 0.05). Image quality was rated 3.9 +/- 0.5 for pVFSE versus the hrVFSE standard;depiction of the contrast agent 4.8 +/- 0.3;noise 3.6 +/- 0.5 (P< 0.05);SNR calculations revealed a relative decreased of 43.9% for pVFSE as compared to hrVFSE. Conclusion: Pulsed VFSE is feasible, providing diagnostic image quality at a significant dose reduction as compared to hrVFSE

    Age-dependent differences in DNA damage after in vitro CT exposure

    No full text
    <p><b>Purpose:</b> Age dependent radiation sensitivity for DNA damage after in vitro blood exposure by computer tomography (CT) was investigated.</p> <p><b>Materials and methods:</b> Radiation biomarkers (dicentrics and gammaH2AX) in blood samples of newborns, children under five years and adults after sham exposure (0 mGy), low-dose (41 mGy) and high-dose (978 mGy) in vitro CT exposure were analyzed.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> Significantly higher levels of dicentric induction were found for the single and combined newborns/children group compared to adults, by a factor of 1.48 (95% CI 1.30–1.68), after exposure to 978 mGy. Although a significant dose response for damage induction and dose-dependent repair was found, the gammaH2AX assay did not show an age-dependent increase in DNA damage in newborns/children compared to adults. This was the case for the gammaH2AX levels after repair time intervals of 30 minutes and 24 hours, after correcting for the underlying background damage. For the low dose of 41 mGy, the power of the dicentric assay was also not sufficient to detect an age-dependent effect in the sample size investigated.</p> <p><b>Conclusion:</b> A 1.5-fold increased level of dicentric aberrations is detected in newborns and children under five years after 1 Gy radiation exposure.</p
    corecore