Racial/ethnic differences in survival among gastric cancer patients in california

BackgroundGastric cancer is an important cause of death among racial/ethnic minorities in the U.S. The objective of this study was to investigate racial disparities in survival among gastric cancer patients within demographic and disease subgroups.MethodsPatients diagnosed with invasive epithelial gastric cancer between 2006 and 2015 were identified from the California Cancer Registry. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with survival among non-Hispanic whites (NHWs, n = 7,475), non-Hispanic blacks (NHBs, n = 1,246), Hispanics (n = 6,274), and Asians/Pacific Islanders (APIs, n = 4,204). Survival was compared across race/ethnicity within subgroups of demographic and disease factors. Five-year relative survival was also calculated within subgroups.ResultsThere were notable differences in patient characteristics by race/ethnicity, but predictors of survival were similar for each group. Overall, APIs (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.88, p < 0.0001) and Hispanics (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90, 0.99, p = 0.0104) had better survival than NHWs, but NHBs and NHWs did not have different prognosis (HR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98, 1.15, p = 0.2237). The survival advantage of APIs persisted in nearly every demographic and disease subgroup, but Hispanics and NHBs had similar survival as NHWs in most groups. Race was not a significant predictor of survival among those with public or no insurance and patients with cardia tumors.ConclusionsThere are some differences in survival by race/ethnicity, but race/ethnicity alone cannot explain disparate outcomes in gastric cancer. Future studies, particularly ones that investigate the role of population-specific etiological factors and molecular tumor profiles, are needed to further understand factors associated with survival

Sociodemographic disparities in chemotherapy treatment and impact on survival among patients with metastatic bladder cancer

ObjectiveTo evaluate how socioeconomic status and other demographic factors are associated with the receipt of chemotherapy and subsequent survival in patients diagnosed with metastatic bladder cancer.MethodsUsing data from the California Cancer Registry, we identified 3,667 patients diagnosed with metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder between 1988 and 2014. The characteristics of patients who did and did not receive chemotherapy as part of the first course of treatment were compared using chi-square tests. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of chemotherapy treatment. Fine and Gray competing-risks regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate bladder cancer-specific and all-cause mortality, respectively.ResultsLess than half (46.3%) of patients received chemotherapy. Patients from the lowest socioeconomic quintile were half as likely to have chemotherapy as those from highest quintile (odds ratio = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.4, 0.7). Unmarried patients were significantly less likely to receive treatment (odds ratio = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.5, 0.7). Not receiving chemotherapy was associated with greater mortality from bladder cancer (subdistribution hazard ratio = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3, 1.5) and from all causes (hazard ratio = 2.0, 95% CI: 1.8, 2.1).ConclusionsWe found clear disparities in chemotherapy treatment and survival with respect to socioeconomic and marital status. Future studies should explore the possible reasons why patients with low socioeconomic status and who are unmarried are less likely to have chemotherapy

Pre-diagnosis health-related quality of life and survival in older women with endometrial cancer.

PurposeHealth-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an important prognostic factor in cancer patients. To date, no other studies have assessed the association between HRQOL measured before diagnosis and survival in older women with endometrial cancer.MethodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results - Medicare Health Outcomes Survey linked database was used to identify 995 women who were at least 65 years old and completed a survey before diagnosis with endometrial cancer. We obtained scores for 10 HRQOL scales, as measured by Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 and Veterans RAND 12-Item Survey, and data on activities of daily living (ADLs) impairments and depressive symptoms. Fine and Gray competing risks regression and Cox proportional hazards were used to estimate the association of HRQOL with endometrial cancer-specific and overall survival, respectively.ResultsWomen who died had worse pre-diagnosis HRQOL than women who were still alive at the end of the study period. For every five-point increase in HRQOL score, overall survival improved by 5-9%. The strongest associations were observed for vitality (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.86, 0.97, p = 0.0021) and physical functioning (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.87, 0.97, p = 0.0010). ADL impairments were generally not predictive of survival, though depressive symptoms were significantly associated with increased hazard of death from all causes (HR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.00, 1.79, p = 0.0466).ConclusionHRQOL measured before diagnosis with endometrial cancer has prognostic value. Having measures of HRQOL available at diagnosis may facilitate timely supportive care to improve survival

A Population-Based Study of Incidence and Survival of 1588 Thymic Malignancies: Results From the California Cancer Registry

BackgroundThymic malignancies are rare and there are limited contemporary population-based epidemiological studies for this uncommon cancer.Patients and methodsAdults aged 20 years and older diagnosed with thymic malignancies between 1988 and 2015 were identified from the California Cancer Registry (n = 1588). Trends in age-adjusted incidence rates were examined overall and according to race/ethnicity, and the proportion diagnosed according to stage was evaluated over time. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS), and Fine and Gray competing risks regression for cause-specific survival (CSS).ResultsAge-adjusted incidence increased on average 2.08% per year over the study period (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30%-2.86%; P < .0001), with an incidence of 0.277 cases per 100,000 in 2015. Incidence was highest among Asian/Pacific Islander and non-Hispanic black individuals. The proportion of unknown stage at diagnosis declined as localized diagnoses increased over time. Compared with patients with thymoma, those with thymic carcinoma had significantly worse OS (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.33-2.01; P < .0001) and CSS (subdistribution HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 2.29-3.91; P < .0001). Advanced stage at diagnosis was also associated with worse survival. Surgical intervention was associated with better prognosis for patients with localized (HR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.30; P = .0002) or regional disease (HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.34; P < .0001).ConclusionThymic malignancy incidence is increasing in California. There was incidence variation across race/ethnicity, which warrants future study. These findings provide contemporary insight into the incidence and prognostic factors of thymic malignancies

Underutilization of brachytherapy and disparities in survival for patients with cervical cancer in California.

The treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is external beam radiation (EBRT), concurrent chemotherapy, and brachytherapy (BT). We investigated demographic and socioeconomic factors that influence trends in BT utilization and disparities in survival.Using the California Cancer Registry, cervical cancer patients FIGO IB2-IVA from 2004 to 2014 were identified. We collected tumor, demographic and socioeconomic (SES) factors. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine predictors of use of BT. Using Cox proportional hazards, we examined the impact of BT vs EBRT boost on cause specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS).We identified 4783 patients with FIGO stage 11% IB2; 32% II, 54% III, 3% IVA. Nearly half (45%) of patients were treated with BT, 18% were treated with a EBRT boost, and 37% had no boost. Stage II and III were more likely to be treated with BT (p = 0.002 and p = 0.0168) vs Stage IB2. As patients aged, the use of BT decreased. Using multivariate analysis, BT impacted CCS (HR 1.16, p = 0.0330) and OS (HR 1.14, p = 0.0333). Worse CSS was observed for black patients (p = 0.0002), low SES (p = 0.0263), stage III and IVA (p < 0.0001. Black patients, low and middle SES had worse OS, (p = 0.0003).The utilization of BT in locally advanced cervical cancer was low at 45%, with a decrease in CSS and OS. Black patients and those in low SES had worse CSS. As we strive for outcome improvement in cervical cancer, we need to target increasing access and disparities for quality and value

Underutilization of brachytherapy and disparities in survival for patients with cervical cancer in California.

The treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is external beam radiation (EBRT), concurrent chemotherapy, and brachytherapy (BT). We investigated demographic and socioeconomic factors that influence trends in BT utilization and disparities in survival.Using the California Cancer Registry, cervical cancer patients FIGO IB2-IVA from 2004 to 2014 were identified. We collected tumor, demographic and socioeconomic (SES) factors. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine predictors of use of BT. Using Cox proportional hazards, we examined the impact of BT vs EBRT boost on cause specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS).We identified 4783 patients with FIGO stage 11% IB2; 32% II, 54% III, 3% IVA. Nearly half (45%) of patients were treated with BT, 18% were treated with a EBRT boost, and 37% had no boost. Stage II and III were more likely to be treated with BT (p = 0.002 and p = 0.0168) vs Stage IB2. As patients aged, the use of BT decreased. Using multivariate analysis, BT impacted CCS (HR 1.16, p = 0.0330) and OS (HR 1.14, p = 0.0333). Worse CSS was observed for black patients (p = 0.0002), low SES (p = 0.0263), stage III and IVA (p < 0.0001. Black patients, low and middle SES had worse OS, (p = 0.0003).The utilization of BT in locally advanced cervical cancer was low at 45%, with a decrease in CSS and OS. Black patients and those in low SES had worse CSS. As we strive for outcome improvement in cervical cancer, we need to target increasing access and disparities for quality and value