16 research outputs found

    Healthcare of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Middle-Aged and Older Adults: The Role of Minority Stress, Sociodemographic Characteristics and Social Resources

    No full text
    Aging lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) middle-aged and older adults are a health disparate population with unique healthcare challenges. Using data from the Aging with Pride: National Health, Aging, Sexuality/Gender Study (NHAS; N = 2,560), the objective was to examine contextual factors that influence the healthcare utilization of LGBT middle-aged and older adults. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions were used to examine access to social resources according to LGBT identity (main effects) and additional sociodemographic variations (interaction effects). Findings suggested that lesbian and transgender respondents had larger social networks than gay respondents. Gay respondents had less social support than lesbians and both groups had more than transgender respondents. Lesbians had more community belonging than all other groups. Education and age moderated the association between LGBT identity and social support. College-level education had a buffering effect on social support among bisexual females, but a negative effect among gay respondents. Older age had a buffering effect on social support among bisexual female and transgender respondents. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess the main effects of disclosure and internalized stigma on healthcare utilization and the interaction effects between disclosure and internalized stigma and social resources on healthcare utilization. Findings indicated associations between disclosure and health screenings, and having a regular provider, and an association between internalized stigma and routine checkups. Higher levels of social support and disclosure in tandem, increased the likelihood of health screenings. Causal indirect, direct, and total causal effects based on counterfactuals were computed to assess mediational links between discrimination/victimization and healthcare utilization via healthcare barriers. Discrimination/victimization had an indirect effect on health screenings via fear accessing health services both inside and outside of the LGBT community, financial barriers to care or medication, and being uninsured. Discrimination/victimization also had an effect on routine checkups and having a regular provider, via fear seeking health services outside of the LGBT community, financial barriers and being uninsured. Findings from this dissertation can be utilized in LGBT cultural competency trainings for health and human service providers serving aging LGBT people

    Feasibility of the Savvy Caregiver Program for LGBTQ+ Caregivers of People Living with Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias

    No full text
    Nearly 350,000 lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer/questioning (LGBTQ+) adults in the U.S. are currently living with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD). Informal caregivers face challenges impacting their ability to access and receive adequate and inclusive care for LGBTQ+ persons living with ADRD. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Savvy Caregiver Program for caregivers of LGBTQ+ individuals living with ADRD. Data for this secondary analysis come from caregivers (n = 17) who completed 6 sessions of the Savvy program. Caregivers were very satisfied with tailored program activities. Analyses of trends suggest non-significant increases in positive aspects of caregiving and decreases in caregiver burden and depressive symptoms. This is the first known study assessing the feasibility of the Savvy Caregiver Program for caregivers of LGBTQ+ individuals living with ADRD. Future research on the Savvy Caregiver Program for caregivers of LGBTQ+ people living with ADRD is needed

    Health Disparities of Older Adults in California: The Role of Sexual Identity and Latinx Ethnicity

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We examined the health disparities of older adults (age 50 and older) in California at the intersection of sexual identity and Latinx ethnicity, by comparing the prevalence of health outcomes of 4 groups: LGB (lesbian, gay, and bisexual) Latinx, straight Latinx, LGB non-Latinx, and straight non-Latinx older adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were from the 2015–2016 California Health Interview Survey. Multivariable logistic regressions tested differences among the 4 groups and the effect of covariates on prevalence of mental and physical health outcomes. We compared LGB and straight people within the same ethnic groups and Latinx and non-Latinx people within the same sexual identity groups to understand the intersectional effect of Latinx ethnicity and LGB identity. RESULTS: Tests by sexual identity showed that among Latinx older adults, more LGB than non-LGB people experienced serious psychological distress. Among non-Latinx older adults, there were no health disparities due to sexual identity. Tests by Latinx ethnicity showed that among LGB older adults, more Latinx than non-Latinx people were obese. Among straight people, more Latinx than non-Latinx older people had poor health, diabetes, and obesity. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The compounded effect of Latinx and LGB identity on psychological distress is notable. However, most health disparities were among straight older adults, between Latinx and non-Latinx people, indicating that Latinx, not sexual identity, nor their intersection, was most influential. Given the importance of sociodemographic factors on health outcomes, programs targeting LGB older adults should take a comprehensive approach to understand their experiences as ethnic minorities

    Social Resource Variations Among LGBT Middle-Aged and Older Adults: The Intersections of Sociodemographic Characteristics

    No full text
    Background and Objectives Understanding the influence of social resources on health is crucial in gerontological research. However, access to social resources may differ by one's particular lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) identity and the intersection of LGBT identity with other sociodemographic characteristics, including age. Research Design and Methods Using 2010 data from Caring and Aging With Pride (N = 2,536), this study examined how access to social resources varied by LGBT identity and whether the effect of LGBT identity was modified by additional sociodemographic characteristics among LGBT adults aged 50-95 years. Results Lesbian respondents had larger social networks than gay male respondents, and gay male respondents had smaller networks than transgender respondents. Lesbian respondents reported more social support and community belonging than other identity groups. Bisexual male respondents and transgender respondents had less support than gay male respondents, and bisexual male respondents reported less community belonging than gay male respondents. Age and education moderated the association between LGBT identity and social support. Discussion and Implications This study demonstrated differences in access to social resources according to environmental circumstances that can intersect and govern access to social resources. Findings highlight the importance of considering social support separately from social network size; thus, large social networks do not necessarily provide ample social support. LGBT older adults had different perceptions of social support than their middle-aged counterparts. Health and human service professionals should not only consider the sexual and gender identity of their LGBT clients, but also education and age when assessing access to social resources.N

    The Role of Contextual Factors in the Health Care Utilization of Aging LGBT Adults

    No full text
    BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Research suggests lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) populations have unique health care challenges. The purpose of this study was to understand contextual factors, including minority stress and social resources, associated with the health care utilization of LGBT middle-aged and older adults. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from the Caring and Aging With Pride: National Health, Aging, and Sexuality/Gender Study (N = 2,560), multiple logistic regression investigated associations between minority stress (i.e., internalized stigma and LGBT identity disclosure) and health care utilization (i.e., health screenings, emergency room use, routine checkups, and regular provider). We also examined the moderating effect of social resources (i.e., social network size, social support, and LGBT community belonging) in these associations. RESULTS: Internalized stigma was negatively associated with having a routine checkup in the previous year. LGBT identity disclosure was positively associated with having a health screening within the past 3 years. Social support moderated the association between LGBT identity disclosure and health screenings. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Health and human service professionals and their clients should be educated about the ways that LGBT identity disclosure can affect health care utilization. Providers should consistently assess the social support of their aging LGBT clients and inform them about the potential risk of low social support in health care utilization.N
    corecore