10 research outputs found
The importance of learning processes in transitioning small-scale irrigation schemes
Many small-scale irrigation schemes are dysfunctional, and learning,
innovation and evaluation are required to facilitate sustainable
transitions. Using quantitative and qualitative data from five irrigation
schemes in sub-Saharan Africa, we analyze how learning and
change arose in response to: soil monitoring tools, which triggered
a deep learning cycle; and agricultural innovation platforms, which
helped develop a social learning system. Knowledge generation
and innovation were driven by the incentives of more profitable
farming. Learning and change spread to farmers without the tools,
and learning at different levels resulted in extension and governance
stakeholders facilitating profound institutional change
The role of soil water monitoring tools and agricultural innovation platforms in improving food security and income of farmers in smallholder irrigation schemes in Tanzania
Smallholder irrigation is an important pathway towards better livelihoods and food security in sub-Saharan Africa. This article assesses the contribution of farmer-friendly soil and water monitoring tools, and agricultural innovation platforms, towards household income
and food security in two small-scale irrigation schemes in Tanzania. Quantitative and qualitative data from farmer’s field books, household surveys and focus groups were used to assess the impacts of the two interventions. The two interventions together contributed to enhancing smallholders’ food security and household income in the
two schemes, as did the agricultural innovation platform on its own
Transforming smallholder irrigation into profitable and self-sustaining systems in southern Africa
Small-scale communal irrigation schemes in Africa have not realised returns on investment.
Critical to this failure is that funders, designers and managers of these schemes have not
recognized them as complex socio-ecological systems with a diversity of constraints. These
schemes are often under-performing and characterized by a subsistence orientation, which
is compounded by poor market integration, low capacity to invest in crop production, low
yields, difficulties paying for water, or lack of willingness to participate in system maintenance.
The end result is unsustainable utilization of resources, failed infrastructure, inefficient use of
water and land and increased conflict over access to these resources.
Conventional irrigation scheme development has focused on ‘hard’ technologies to improve the
functionality and efficiency of infrastructure and/or irrigation application technologies. However,
hard technology improvements on their own have failed to deliver sustainable schemes and
improve the livelihoods of irrigation farmers (Inocencio et al., 2007): broken and decaying infrastructure
is just one element of an underperforming system. While technologies that are more
efficient may help improve yield, they will not necessarily improve profitability. A great many irrigation
schemes are trapped in a negative cycle of infrastructure provision, unprofitable farming,
lack of investment in maintenance, infrastructure degradation leading to donors subsidizing
infrastructure rehabilitation (Pittock & Stirzaker, 2014; Bjornlund et al., 2017)..
The influences on farmers' planned and actual farm adaptation decisions: Evidence from small-scale irrigation schemes in South-Eastern Africa
Studies are scarce linking planned farmer adaptation practices with their actual practices over time. This study addresses this gap by investigating planned and actual adaptation behaviour, using data collected in 2014 and 2017, from various irrigation schemes in south-eastern Africa. Four planned farm adaptation indexes were created and analysed, with findings suggesting that land size, previous adaptation experience and credit access were positively associated with all types of adaptation. The results from the two waves of survey analysis also indicated very different influences between planned and actual practices, with the proportion of farmers actually undertaking a particular practice far greater than those who planned to undertake it. This result might be related to the project intervention within the study schemes, where numerous factors previously hampering irrigation were resolved, increasing farmers' ability to adapt. Enhancing the availability and quality of education, extension services and finance could be valuable in encouraging further farm adaptation.Fentahun Abebe, Alec Zuo, Sarah Ann Wheeler, Henning Bjornlund, Mario Chilundo, Luitfred Kissoly, Thabani Dub
Transforming smallholder irrigation into profitable and self-sustaining systems in southern Africa
Small-scale communal irrigation schemes in Africa have not realised returns on investment. Critical to this failure is that funders, designers and managers of these schemes have not recognized them as complex socio-ecological systems with a diversity of constraints. These schemes are often under-performing and characterized by a subsistence orientation, which is compounded by poor market integration, low capacity to invest in crop production, low yields, difficulties paying for water, or lack of willingness to participate in system maintenance. The end result is unsustainable utilization of resources, failed infrastructure, inefficient use of water and land and increased conflict over access to these resources. Conventional irrigation scheme development has focused on ‘hard’ technologies to improve the functionality and efficiency of infrastructure and/or irrigation application technologies. However, hard technology improvements on their own have failed to deliver sustainable schemes and improve the livelihoods of irrigation farmers (Inocencio et al., 2007): broken and decaying infrastructure is just one element of an underperforming system. While technologies that are more efficient may help improve yield, they will not necessarily improve profitability. A great many irrigation schemes are trapped in a negative cycle of infrastructure provision, unprofitable farming,
lack of investment in maintenance, infrastructure degradation leading to donors subsidizing infrastructure rehabilitation (Pittock & Stirzaker, 2014; Bjornlund et al., 2017)
Expert-based ex-ante assessments of potential social, ecological, and economic impacts of upgrading strategies for improving food security in rural Tanzania using the ScalA-FS approach
Journal Article 2017Subsistence farmers in sub-Saharan Africa are
highly vulnerable to food insecurity given their low adaptive
capacity against ecological and socio-economic shocks.
Therefore, food security is one of their main challenges.
Participatory action research across food value chains
(FVCs) can help stabilize and enhance food security by developing
upgrading strategies (UPS) that enhance specific aspects
of crop production, post-harvest processing, marketing,
income generation, and consumption. However, prior to their
widespread adoption or upscaling, UPS need holistic understandings
of their potential social, ecological, economic, and
institutional challenges and opportunities in target areas. This
article reports the application of the BScalA-FS^ tool, which
assessed the potential success of selected UPS using assessment
criteria developed by agricultural scientists and local
farmers in a participatory process in Tanzania. This work is
embedded in a larger participatory research project conducted
in semi-arid and sub-humid ecological settings of the Dodoma
and Morogoro regions of Tanzania. Results from the assessment
of the potential impact of the UPS differed strongly
between the UPS and the social, economic and environmental
assessment criteria, but only slightly between semi-arid and
sub-humid regions. The positive impacts of food-securing
UPS centre on productivity and income generation. Rain water
harvesting, fertilizer micro-dosing, optimized weeding,
and promotion of kitchen gardens were expected to have the
highest impacts after implementation. The ScalA-FS ex-ante
assessments provide a knowledge base about potential impacts,
as well as the potential bottlenecks to address during
the implementation of UPS