68 research outputs found

    We Salute Our Campus Leaders

    Get PDF
    Margaret Ann Kirchner brings introductions to campus women leading in Iowa State activitie

    Off to the War

    Get PDF

    For Victory-

    Get PDF
    A student Red Cross sewing project contributes to the army\u27s needs, says Margaret Ann Kirchne

    The Iowa Homemaker vol.21, no.3

    Get PDF
    Freshmen – Please Note, page 2 Hospital Research, Ann Koebel, page 3 Orchids to Pat, page 4 The Army Eats Well, Mary I. Barber, page 5 Making Things Grow, Betty Ann Iverson, page 6 Look Before You Snap, Kathryn Monson, page 7 Major Departments on Review, Elizabeth Murfield, page 8 Patriotic Sally, Patricia Hayes, page 10 What’s New in Home Economics, Dorothy Olson, page 12 Summer Job Holders Reap Experience, page 14 A List of Don’ts, Costume Design Class, page 15 We Salute Campus Leaders, Margaret Kirchner, page 16 Home Economics Looks to Future, M. L. Morton, page 17 Behind Bright Jackets, Julie Wendel, page 18 Alums in the News, Mary Elizabeth Sather, page 20 Nutrition for Defense, Dorothy Ann Roost, page 22 That Personal Touch, Margaret Ann Clarke, page 23 Journalistic Spindles, Elizabeth Hanson, page 2

    The Iowa Homemaker vol.21, no.8

    Get PDF
    We Want to Be Likeable, Mary Ellen Sullivan, page 2 Cotton hose Enlist Glamour, Elizabeth Ann Murfield, page 3 Memorial Union Plans Food for a Year, Pat Garberson, page 4 Government Drafts Textiles, Patricia Hayes, page 5 Gay Clothes Boost Sally’s Morale, Virginia Brainard, page 7 War Revamps Textile World, Betty Roth, page 8 Dehydrated Foods Gain New Victories, Janet Wilson, page 9 What’s New in Home Economics, Dorothy Olson, page 10 Departmental Highlights, Lila Williamson, page 12 War Rations British Homemaking, Marabeth Paddock, page 13 Across Alumnae Desks, Marjorie Thomas, page 14 Bookmarks, Julie Wendel, page 15 File That Information, Barbara Burbank, page 17 Alums in the News, Bette Simpson, page 18 For Victory, Margaret Ann Kirchner, page 20 Spindles, Trymby Calhoun, page 2

    Double Blind Study Investigating the Effect of Different Voice Prostheses on Ease of Swallowing and Residue Post Laryngectomy.

    Get PDF
    Voice prostheses have been examined for their effect on voice production but there is little datum on their effect on swallow function. This study investigated the difference between six commonly available voice prostheses in terms of swallowing. Laryngectomy patients had up to six voice prostheses placed in a random order over two visits. Swallowing was evaluated for each prosthesis using FEES (Fibreoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing). After each prosthesis trial, patients self-evaluated their experience of swallowing. Three independent experts indicated which prosthesis they considered best for swallowing for each patient and judged residue on the voice prosthesis and in the upper esophagus. Raters were blinded to participant details, voice prosthesis type and scores of other raters. On patient self-evaluation, scores were equally distributed across all prostheses for swallowing. Experts most frequently chose the Blom Singer Low pressure and Blom Singer Classic Indwelling voice prostheses as best for swallowing but consensus was poor for most patients. Experts found that the Blom Singer Classic Indwelling and the Provox Vega had least residue on the voice prosthesis on thin liquid (p ≤ 0.001) and soft (p = 0.001), respectively. Experts also found that the Blom Singer Low Pressure had least residue in the upper esophagus on soft consistency (p ≤ 0.001). While self-evaluation by patients did not identify a consistently preferred prosthesis for swallow, many patients expressed personal preferences, suggesting benefits to involving patients in the choice of prosthesis. Some voice prostheses may be associated with lower levels of residue on the prosthesis and upper esophagus with certain consistencies
    • …
    corecore