Low radiation dose in computed tomography: the role of iodine

Recent approaches to reducing radiation exposure during CT examinations typically utilize automated dose modulation strategies on the basis of lower tube voltage combined with iterative reconstruction and other dose-saving techniques. Less clearly appreciated is the potentially substantial role that iodinated contrast media (CM) can play in low-radiation-dose CT examinations. Herein we discuss the role of iodinated CM in low-radiation-dose examinations and describe approaches for the optimization of CM administration protocols to further reduce radiation dose and/or CM dose while maintaining image quality for accurate diagnosis. Similar to the higher iodine attenuation obtained at low-tube-voltage settings, high-iodine-signal protocols may permit radiation dose reduction by permitting a lowering of mAs while maintaining the signal-to-noise ratio. This is particularly feasible in first pass examinations where high iodine signal can be achieved by injecting iodine more rapidly. The combination of low kV and IR can also be used to reduce the iodine dose. Here, in optimum contrast injection protocols, the volume of CM administered rather than the iodine concentration should be reduced, since with high-iodine-concentration CM further reductions of iodine dose are achievable for modern first pass examinations. Moreover, higher concentrations of CM more readily allow reductions of both flow rate and volume, thereby improving the tolerability of contrast administration

High-Resolution Steady State Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Are Intravascular Agents Necessary? Feasibility and Preliminary Experience With Gadobenate Dimeglumine

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate the potential of gadobenate dimeglumine for high-resolution steady-state (SS) contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the carotid arteries as an adjunct to conventional first-pass (FP) MRA, with computed tomography angiography (CTA) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference. Materials and Methods: Institutional ethics committee approval and written informed consent were obtained. Forty consecutive patients underwent conventional FP MRA with 15 mL gadobenate dimeglumine, using a conventional 3D FLASH sequence (14 see acquisition time). Immediately afterward, SS images were obtained using a high resolution coronal 3D FLASH sequence (240 see acquisition time). All patients also underwent CTA and conventional DSA within 8 +/- 3 days. Three experienced radiologists assessed FP and SS image quality and calculated sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and predictive values for stenosis grade and length, plaque morphology, and tandem lesions using DSA as reference. Detected stenoses were quantified and compared (Spearman rank correlation coefficient, [R(s)]. McNemar test) with DSA and CTA findings. Inter-read variability was assessed using kappa (kappa) statistics. The impact of SS acquisitions on diagnostic confidence and patient management was assessed. Results: MRA FP and SS image quality was excellent in 63 (78.8%) and 46 (57.5%) vessels, adequate in 11 (13.8%) and 20 (25.0%) vessels, and poor in 6 (7.5%) and 14 (17.5%) vessels, respectively. Area under the curve analysis revealed no significant differences between MRA FP, MRA FP + SS, and CTA for the grading of stenoses (P = 0.838; accuracy values of 97.4% 97.4%, and 98.7%, respectively). Greater accuracy (P < 0.001) was noted for FP + SS images over FP images alone for the assessment of plaque morphology (96.1% for FP + SS images vs. 83.3% for FP). Increased diagnostic confidence was noted for 49 (61.3%) vessels because of additional SS images whereas an impact on final diagnosis was noted in 8 (10%) cases. Good correlation was noted between SS image quality and impact on final diagnosis (R(s) = 0.7; P < 0.0001). Conclusion: SS imaging of the carotid arteries is feasible with gadobenate dimeglumine. The increased spatial resolution attainable allows improved evaluation of stenoses and plaque irregularity, yielding comparable diagnostic performance to that of CTA and DSA

Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection

PURPOSE: To compare the effects on heart rate (HR), on left ventricular (LV) or arterial pressures, and the general safety of a non-ionic low-osmolar contrast medium (CM) and a non-ionic iso-osmolar CM in patients undergoing cardiac angiography (CA) or peripheral intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two double-blind, randomized studies were conducted in 216 patients who underwent CA (n=120) or peripheral IA-DSA (n=96). Patients referred for CA received a low-osmolar monomeric CM (iomeprol-350, n=60) or an iso-osmolar dimeric CM (iodixanol-320; n=60). HR and LV peak systolic and end-diastolic pressures were determined before and after the first injection during left and right coronary arteriography and left ventriculography. Monitoring for all types of adverse event (AE) was performed for 24 h following the procedure. t-tests were performed to compare CM for effects on HR. Patients referred for IA-DSA received iomeprol-300 (n=49) or iodixanol-320 (n=47). HR and arterial blood pressure (BP) were evaluated before and after the first 4 injections. Monitoring for AE was performed for 4 h following the procedure. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare mean HR changes across the first 4 injections, whereas changes after the first injection were compared using t-tests. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted between iomeprol and iodixanol in terms of mean changes in HR during left coronary arteriography (p=0.8), right coronary arteriography (p=0.9), and left ventriculography (p=0.8). In patients undergoing IA-DSA, no differences between CM were noted for effects on mean HR after the first injection (p=0.6) or across the first 4 injections (p=0.2). No significant differences (p>0.05) were noted in terms of effects on arterial BP in either study or on LV pressures in patients undergoing CA. Non-serious AE considered possibly CM-related (primarily headache and events affecting the cardiovascular and digestive systems) were reported more frequently by patients undergoing CA and more frequently after iodixanol (14/60 [23.3%] and 2/47 [4.3%]; CA and IA-DSA, respectively) than iomeprol (10/60 [16.7%] and 1/49 [2%], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Iomeprol and iodixanol are safe and have equally negligible effects on HR and LV pressures or arterial BP during and after selective intra-cardiac injection and peripheral IA-DSA. CLINICAL APPLICATION: Iomeprol and iodixanol are safe and equally well tolerated with regard to cardiac rhythm and clinical preference should be based on diagnostic image quality alone

Effect of Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Surgical Decision Making and Cancer Recurrence Rates

Purpose: To evaluate breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for cancer staging and surgical planning in patients with known breast cancer, and to evaluate recurrence rates at long-term follow-up. Methods and Materials: Institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained. Preoperative MRI with 0.1 mmol/kg gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance) was performed in 203/274 women with confirmed breast cancer. The sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive value of MRI compared with mammography/ultrasound for malignant lesion detection were calculated, and the effect of MRI on surgical decision making evaluated. The cancer recurrence rate was determined for 172 patients with available 2- to 8-year follow-up data. Results: Mammography/ultrasound detected 229 suspicious lesions. Breast MRI detected 159 additional lesions in 48/203 (23.6%) patients; of which 110/110 were correctly classified as malignant and 28/49 as benign, giving sensitivity, accuracy, and positive predictive values for malignant lesion detection of 100% (110/110), 86.8% (138/159), and 84.0% (110/131), respectively. MRI revealed unsuspected multifocal, multicentric, and synchronous contralateral lesions in 7/48, 16/48, and 16/48 patients, respectively, and pectoralis muscle infiltration in 3/38 patients. In 6/48 women, MRI revealed lesions not seen on conventional imaging (n = 5) or discounted suspected multifocal disease (n = 1). Therapy was changed for 50/203 (24.6%) patients: 38 patients underwent more extensive surgery and 12 less extensive surgery. Six (3.5%) recurrences occurred, in all cases at >4 years. Conclusion: Breast MRI positively affects patient management and is recommended for mapping tumor extent in patients with newly diagnosed cancer. The cancer recurrence rate at long-term follow-up after MRI is low