Routine use of ancillary investigations in staging diffuse large B-cell lymphoma improves the International Prognostic Index (IPI)

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The International Prognostic Index (IPI) is used to determine prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). One of the determinants of IPI is the stage of disease with bone marrow involvement being classified as stage IV. For the IPI, involvement on bone marrow is traditionally defined on the basis of histology with ancillary investigations used only in difficult cases to aid histological diagnosis. This study aimed to determine the effect of the routine use of flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry and molecular studies in bone marrow staging upon the IPI.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Bone marrow trephines of 156 histologically proven DLBCL cases at initial diagnosis were assessed on routine histology, and immunohistochemistry using two T-cell markers (CD45RO and CD3), two B-cell markers (CD20 and CD79a) and kappa and lambda light chains. Raw flow cytometry data on all samples were reanalysed and reinterpreted blindly. DNA extracted from archived paraffin-embedded trephine biopsy samples was used for immunoglobulin heavy chain and light chain gene rearrangement analysis. Using immunophenotyping (flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry), 30 (19.2%) cases were upstaged to stage IV. A further 8 (5.1%) cases were upstaged using molecular studies. A change in IPI was noted in 18 cases (11.5%) on immunophenotyping alone, and 22 (14.1%) cases on immunophenotyping and molecular testing. Comparison of two revised IPI models, 1) using immunophenotyping alone, and 2) using immunophenotyping with molecular studies, was performed with baseline IPI using a Cox regression model. It showed that the revised IPI model using immunophenotyping provides the best differentiation between the IPI categories.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Improved bone marrow staging using flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry improves the predictive value of the IPI in patients with DLBCL and should be performed routinely in all cases.</p

Morphologic diagnosis of leukaemic B-lymphoproliferative disorders and the role of cyclin D1 expression

Purpose: This study analysed the morphologic differences between leukaemic mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, nodal marginal zone lymphoma, and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in peripheral blood. Additionally, we investigated the role of cyclin D1 expression in B-lymphoproliferative disorders. Methods: The morphologic analysis of the leukaemic cells was performed on cytocentrifuge preparations after separation of mononuclear cells from peripheral blood using a Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient. Cyclin D1 protein expression was studied with the catalyzed signal amplification system. The expression of other markers (CD5, CD23, light chain immunoglobulins) was analysed by the APAAP method. Results: We describe in detail the morphology of the lymphoma cells in eight patients with mantle cell lymphoma, six patients with follicular lymphoma, 11 patients with nodal marginal zone lymphoma, and seven patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The morphological distinction between these lymphoma cells is a challenge for the haematologist. The investigation of cytocentrifuge preparations of mononuclear cells allows the detection of lymphoma cells also in cases with nondiagnostic white cell differential. Additionally, the immunotype (light chain restriction, CD5, CD23, and cyclin D1) of 108 patients with leukaemic B-lymphoproliferative disorders was studied. Diffuse nuclear expression of cyclin D1 protein (>20%) was specific for mantle cell lymphoma. However, only 6/8 patients showed cyclin-D1 positivity. Conclusions: The morphologic analysis of lymphoma cells in cytocentrifuge preparations of mononuclear leukocytes in combination with immunocytochemical investigation allows the detection of mantle cells, centrocytes of follicular lymphoma, marginal zone cells, and cells of the diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in peripheral blood. The positivity of cyclin D1 protein improves the differentiation of mantle cells from other lymphoma cells

Docetaxel and continuous-infusion fluorouracil versus epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: a randomized phase II study

PURPOSE: A combination of docetaxel and fluorouracil (DF) was evaluated in an outpatient setting and compared with epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (ECF), which served as an internal control arm to avoid selection bias. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma without prior chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive either ECF (epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) day 1, cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) day 1, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m(2) days 1 through 21, every 3 weeks) or DF (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) day 1, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m(2) days 1 through 21, every 3 weeks). RESULTS: Ninety patients were randomly assigned. Toxicity was rarely severe. Major toxic effects included diarrhea, stomatitis, and leukopenia in the DF arm and nausea, vomiting, and leukopenia in the ECF arm. Forty-three of 45 patients in each arm were assessable. In the DF arm, two patients (4.4%, intent to treat) experienced a confirmed complete tumor remission as best response, and 15 patients (33.3%) experienced a confirmed partial remission (overall response rate [ORR], 37.8%; 95% CI, 25.9% to 51.9%). Two patients (4.4%) in the ECF arm showed confirmed complete remission, and 14 (31.1%) showed confirmed partial remission (ORR, 35.6%; 95% CI, 24.8% to 48.7%). For the DF and ECF arms, the median survival was 9.5 and 9.7 months, and the median time to tumor progression 5.5 and 5.3 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: DF can be safely given in an ambulant setting. Compared with ECF, the dual combination of DF shows promising efficacy and may be an alternative treatment option that avoids cisplatin