17 research outputs found

    The Use of Research Evidence in Public Health Decision Making Processes: Systematic Review

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The use of research evidence to underpin public health policy is strongly promoted. However, its implementation has not been straightforward. The objectives of this systematic review were to synthesise empirical evidence on the use of research evidence by public health decision makers in settings with universal health care systems. METHODS: To locate eligible studies, 13 bibliographic databases were screened, organisational websites were scanned, key informants were contacted and bibliographies of included studies were scrutinised. Two reviewers independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Data were synthesised as a narrative review. FINDINGS: 18 studies were included: 15 qualitative studies, and three surveys. Their methodological quality was mixed. They were set in a range of country and decision making settings. Study participants included 1063 public health decision makers, 72 researchers, and 174 with overlapping roles. Decision making processes varied widely between settings, and were viewed differently by key players. A range of research evidence was accessed. However, there was no reliable evidence on the extent of its use. Its impact was often indirect, competing with other influences. Barriers to the use of research evidence included: decision makers' perceptions of research evidence; the gulf between researchers and decision makers; the culture of decision making; competing influences on decision making; and practical constraints. Suggested (but largely untested) ways of overcoming these barriers included: research targeted at the needs of decision makers; research clearly highlighting key messages; and capacity building. There was little evidence on the role of research evidence in decision making to reduce inequalities. CONCLUSIONS: To more effectively implement research informed public health policy, action is required by decision makers and researchers to address the barriers identified in this systematic review. There is an urgent need for evidence to support the use of research evidence to inform public health decision making to reduce inequalities

    Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy to Femur Metastases for Oligometastatic Disease Control or Reirradiation: Results From a Large Single-Institution Experience

    No full text
    Purpose: There are limited data regarding outcomes after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for femur metastases, which was an exclusion criteria for the Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancers (SABR-COMET) trial. We aimed to characterize clinical outcomes from a large single institution experience. Methods and Materials: Forty-eight patients with 53 lesions were consecutively treated with femur SBRT from May 2017 to June 2022. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models were used to characterize time-to-event endpoints and associations between baseline factors and clinical outcomes, respectively. Local control and locoregional control were defined as the absence of tumor progression within the radiation treatment field or within the treated femur, respectively. Results: Most patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 (90%), prostate (52%) or breast/lung (17%) cancer, and 1 to 3 lesions (100%), including 29 proximal and 5 distal. Fifty-seven percent of the lesions were treated with concurrent systemic therapy. Median planning target volume was 49.1 cc (range, 6.6-387 cc). Planning target volume V100 (%) was 99% (range, 90-100). Fractionation included 18 to 20 Gy/1F, 27 to 30 Gy/3F, and 28.5-40 Gy/5F. Forty-two percent had Mirels score ≄7 and most (94%) did not have extraosseous extension. Acute toxicities included grade 1 fatigue (15%), pain flare (7.5%), nausea (3.8%), and decreased blood counts (1.9%). Late toxicities included fracture (1.9%) at 1.5 years and osteonecrosis (4%) from dose of 40 Gy in 5F and 30 Gy in 5F (after prior 30 Gy/10F). One patient (2%) required fixation postradiation for progressive pain. With median follow-up 19.4 months, 1- and 2-year rates of local control were 94% and 89%, locoregional control was 83% and 67%, progression-free survival were 56% and 25%, and overall survival were 91% and 73%. Fifty percent of local regional recurrence events occurred within 5 cm of gross tumor volume. Conclusions: Femur SBRT for oligometastatic disease control in well-selected patients was associated with good outcomes with minimal rates of acute and late toxicity. Patterns of local regional recurrence warrant consideration of larger elective volume coverage. Additional prospective study is needed
    corecore