18 research outputs found
Evaluation of Social Media Use by Emergency Medicine Residents and Faculty
Introduction
Clinicians and residency programs are increasing their use of social media (SM) websites for educational and promotional uses, yet little is known about the use of these sites by residents and faculty. The objective of the study is to assess patterns of SM use for personal and professional purposes among emergency medicine (EM) residents and faculty.
Methods
In this multi-site study, an 18-question survey was sent by e-mail to the residents and faculty in 14 EM programs and to the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) listserv via the online tool SurveyMonkey™. We compiled descriptive statistics, including assessment with the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. StatsDirect software (v 2.8.0, StatsDirect, Cheshire, UK) was used for all analyses.
Results
We received 1,314 responses: 63% of respondents were male, 40% were <30 years of age, 39% were between the ages 31 and 40, and 21% were older than 40. The study group consisted of 772 residents and 542 faculty members (15% were program directors, 21% were assistant or associate PDs, 45% were core faculty, and 19% held other faculty positions. Forty-four percent of respondents completed residency more than 10 years ago. Residents used SM markedly more than faculty for social interactions with family and friends (83% vs 65% [p<0.0001]), entertainment (61% vs 47% [p<0.0001]), and videos (42% vs 23% [p=0.0006]). Residents used Facebookâ„¢ and YouTubeâ„¢ more often than faculty (86% vs 67% [p<0.001]; 53% vs 46% [p=0.01]), whereas residents used Twitterâ„¢ (19% vs 26% [p=0.005]) and LinkedInâ„¢ (15% vs 32% [p<0.0001]) less than faculty. Overall, residents used SM sites more than faculty, notably in daily use (30% vs 24% [p<0.001]). For professional use, residents were most interested in its use for open positions/hiring (30% vs 18% [p<0.0001]) and videos (33% vs 26% [p=0.005]) and less interested than faculty with award postings (22% vs 33% [p<0.0001]) or publications (30% vs 38% [p=0.0007]).
Conclusion
EM residents and faculty have different patterns and interests in the personal and professional uses of social media. Awareness of these utilization patterns could benefit future educational endeavors
Recommended from our members
Consensus Guidelines for Digital Scholarship in Academic Promotion.
INTRODUCTION: As scholarship moves into the digital sphere, applicant and promotion and tenure (P&T) committee members lack formal guidance on evaluating the impact of digital scholarly work. The P&T process requires the appraisal of individual scholarly impact in comparison to scholars across institutions and disciplines. As dissemination methods evolve in the digital era, we must adapt traditional P&T processes to include emerging forms of digital scholarship.
METHODS: We conducted a blended, expert consensus procedure using a nominal group process to create a consensus document at the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors Academic Assembly on April 1, 2019.
RESULTS: We discussed consensus guidelines for evaluation and promotion of digital scholarship with the intent to develop specific, evidence-supported recommendations to P&T committees and applicants. These recommendations included the following: demonstrate scholarship criteria; provide external evidence of impact; and include digital peer-review roles. As traditional scholarship continues to evolve within the digital realm, academic medicine should adapt how that scholarship is evaluated. P&T committees in academic medicine are at the epicenter for supporting this changing paradigm in scholarship.
CONCLUSION: P&T committees can critically appraise the quality and impact of digital scholarship using specific, validated tools. Applicants for appointment and promotion should highlight and prepare their digital scholarship to specifically address quality, impact, breadth, and relevance. It is our goal to provide specific, timely guidance for both stakeholders to recognize the value of digital scholarship in advancing our field
Recommended from our members
Navigating the EM Calendar: An Analysis of EM Residency Programs on Social Media
Integration of a Blog into the Emergency Medicine Residency Curriculum
Technologies and techniques for knowledge translation
are rapidly evolving and there is a need for graduate medical
education (GME) curricula to keep up with these advances
to reach our learners in an effective manner. Technologies
such as blogs, microblogs, wikis, podcasts, and vodcasts have
the potential to expand upon the current didactic models by
adding dimensions and engaging learners in modalities not
previously available
Integration of a Blog into the Emergency Medicine Residency Curriculum
Technologies and techniques for knowledge translation
are rapidly evolving and there is a need for graduate medical
education (GME) curricula to keep up with these advances
to reach our learners in an effective manner. Technologies
such as blogs, microblogs, wikis, podcasts, and vodcasts have
the potential to expand upon the current didactic models by
adding dimensions and engaging learners in modalities not
previously available
Blog and Podcast Watch: Cutaneous Emergencies
The WestJEM Blog and Podcast Watch presents high quality open-access educational blogs
and podcasts in emergency medicine (EM) based on the ongoing Academic Life in Emergency Medicine
(ALiEM) Approved Instructional Resources (AIR) and AIR-Professional series. Both series critically appraise
resources using an objective scoring rubric. This installment of the Blog and Podcast Watch highlights the
topic of cutaneous emergencies from the AIR series. Â Â
The AIR series is a continuously building curriculum that follows the Council of Emergency Medicine
Residency Directors (CORD) annual testing schedule. For each module, relevant content is collected from the
top 50 most accessed sites per the Social Media Index published within the previous 12 months and scored
by eight board members using five equally weighted measurement outcomes: Best Evidence in Emergency
Medicine (BEEM) score, accuracy, educational utility, evidence based, and references. Resources scoring ≥30
out of 35 available points receive an AIR label. Resources scoring 27-29 receive an “honorable mention” label,
if the editorial board agrees that the post is accurate and educationally valuable.
A total of 35 blog posts and podcasts were evaluated. None scored ≥30 points necessary for
the AIR label, although four honorable mention posts were identified. Key educational pearls from these
honorable mention posts are summarized.
This Blog and Podcast Watch series is based on the AIR and AIR-Pro series, which attempts to
identify high quality educational content on open-access blogs and podcasts. This series provides an expertbased,
post-publication curation of educational social media content for EM clinicians with this installment
focusing on cutaneous emergencies. [West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(2)288-292.
Blog and Podcast Watch: Cutaneous Emergencies
Introduction: The Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM) Blog and Podcast Watch presents high quality open access educational blogs and podcasts in emergency medicine (EM) based on the ongoing ALiEM Approved Instructional Resources (AIR) and AIR-Professional series. Both series critically appraise resources using an objective scoring rubric. This installment of the Blog and Podcast Watch highlights the topic of cutaneous emergencies from the AIR series. Methods: The AIR series is a continuously building curriculum which follows the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Director’s (CORD) annual testing schedule. For each module, relevant content is collected from the top 50 Social Media Index sites published within the previous 12 months and scored by 8 board members using 5 equally weighted measurement outcomes: Best Evidence in Emergency Medicine (BEEM) score, accuracy, educational utility, evidence based, and references. Resources scoring ≥30 out of 35 available points receive an AIR label. Resources scoring 27-29 receive an Honorable Mention label, if the editorial board agrees that the post is accurate and educationally valuable. Results: A total of 35 blog posts and podcasts were evaluated. None scored ≥30 points necessary for the AIR label, although 4 Honorable Mention posts were identified. Key educational pearls from these Honorable Mention posts are summarized. Conclusion: The WestJEM ALiEM Blog and Podcast Watch series is based on the AIR and AIR-Pro series, which attempts to identify high quality educational content on open-access blogs and podcasts. This series provides an expert-based, post-publication curation of educational social media content for EM clinicians with this installment focusing on cutaneous emergencies