Surfactant Effect on Hydrate Crystallization at the Oil–Water Interface

Gas hydrates pose economic and environmental risks to the oil and gas industry when plug formation occurs in pipelines. A novel approach was applied to understand cyclopentane clathrate hydrate formation in the presence of nonionic surfactant to achieve hydrate inhibition at low percent weight compared to thermodynamic inhibitors. The hydrate-inhibiting performance of low (CMC) concentrations of Span 20, Span 80, Pluronic L31, and Tween 65 at 2 °C on a manually nucleated 2 μL droplet showed a morphological shift in crystallization from planar shell growth to conical growth. Monitoring the internal pressure of the water droplet undergoing hydrate crystallization provides information on the change in interfacial tension during the crystallization process. The results of this study will provide information on the surfactant effect on hydrate crystallization and inhibition. At low surfactant concentrations (below CMC), a planar hydrate crystal was formed. Decreasing interfacial tension was observed, which can be related to the shrinking area of the water–cyclopentane interface. At high surfactant concentration, the crystal morphology was shifted to conical. Interfacial tension measurements reveal oscillations of the interfacial tension during the crystallization process. The oscillations of the interfacial tension result from the fact that once the crystal has reached a critical size a portion of the cone breaks free from the droplet surface, which results in a sudden increase in the available surface for the surfactant molecules. Hence, a temporary increase in the interfacial tension can be observed. The oscillatory behavior of the interfacial tension is a result of the growth and release of the hydrate cones from the surface of the droplet. We have found that the most efficient surfactant in hydrate inhibition would be the one with HLB closest to 10 (equal hydrophilic–hydrophobic parts). In this way, the surfactant molecules will stay at the interface as they observe equal affinities for both the oil and water phases. Surfactant molecules that have the strongest affinity to the interface will be able to inhibit the growth of the crystal as they will force the cones to break and will not allow them to grow