Elective induction of labour and expectant management in late-term pregnancy : A prospective cohort study alongside the INDEX randomised controlled trial

Funding Information: BWM reports consultancy for ObsEva. BMW has received research funding from Ferring and Merck. The original RCT was funded by ZonMw: number NTR3431 , Netherlands Trial Registy . BWM is supported by a NHMRC Investigator grant (GNT1176437). Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The AuthorsPeer reviewedPublisher PD

Cost-effectiveness analysis of induction of labour at 41 weeks and expectant management until 42 weeks in low risk women (INDEX trial)

Funding Information: The INDEX trial was supported by a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development ZonMw (grant No 171202008 ). The grantor had no involvement with the study.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Estudo do atendimento ao público em bancos o método das projeções cotadas

Objective To compare induction of labour at 41 weeks with expectant management until 42 weeks in low risk women. Design Open label, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Setting 123 primary care midwifery practices and 45 hospitals (secondary care) in the Netherlands, 2012-16. Participants 1801 low risk women with an uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: randomised to induction (n=900) or to expectant management until 42 weeks (n=901). Interventions Induction at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks with induction if necessary. Primary outcome measures Primary outcome was a composite of perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity (Apgar score <7 at five minutes, arterial pH <7.05, meconium aspiration syndrome, plexus brachialis injury, intracranial haemorrhage, and admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Secondary outcomes included maternal outcomes and mode of delivery. The null hypothesis that expectant management is inferior to induction was tested with a non-inferiority margin of 2%. Results Median gestational age at delivery was 41 weeks+0 days (interquartile range 41 weeks+0 days-41 weeks+1 day) for the induction group and 41 weeks+2 days (41 weeks+0 days-41 weeks+5 days) for the expectant management group. The primary outcome was analysed for both the intention-to-treat population and the per protocol population. In the induction group, 15/900 (1.7%) women had an adverse perinatal outcome versus 28/901 (3.1%) in the expectant management group (absolute risk difference a '1.4%, 95% confidence interval a '2.9% to 0.0%, P=0.22 for non-inferiority). 11 (1.2%) infants in the induction group and 23 (2.6%) in the expectant management group had an Apgar score <7 at five minutes (relative risk (RR) 0.48, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.98). No infants in the induction group and three (0.3%) in the expectant management group had an Apgar score <4 at five minutes. One fetal death (0.1%) occurred in the induction group and two (0.2%) in the expectant management group. No neonatal deaths occurred. 3 (0.3%) neonates in the induction group versus 8 (0.9%) in the expectant management group were admitted to an NICU (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.41). No significant difference was found in composite adverse maternal outcomes (induction n=122 (13.6%) v expectant management n=102 (11.3%)) or in caesarean section rate (both groups n=97 (10.8%)). Conclusions This study could not show non-inferiority of expectant management compared with induction of labour in women with uncomplicated pregnancies at 41 weeks; instead a significant difference of 1.4% was found for risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in favour of induction, although the chances of a good perinatal outcome were high with both strategies and the incidence of perinatal mortality, Apgar score <4 at five minutes, and NICU admission low. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register NTR3431